SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Weegar For Strome

Créé par: ForsbergForVezina
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 oct. 2020
Publié: 13 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Should've traded for Toews. This is a nice consolation prize
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 500 000 $
2750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Borgström, Henrik [Droits de RFA]
  2. Weegar, MacKenzie [Droits de RFA]
FLA
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $68 548 814 $1 090 244 $5 900 000 $12 951 186 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
562 500 $562 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 2
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 116
Mentions "j'aime": 12
I actually really like this for both teams
exo2769 et Kosterjr a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 8
#2
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: Jojo27
I actually really like this for both teams


Me too
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 8
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,227
Mentions "j'aime": 613
Looks good, Florida might want a better defensive prospect but solid
exo2769 et ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 10
#4
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Weegar is a LD right? I thought his d partner was Eakblad
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 10
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,639
Mentions "j'aime": 9,747
I do think this will set our defense onto the correct path. Would still need Seabs to waive his NMC against Seattle Expansion. Heck...I'd extend him for a 1 year $800k deal for him to waive that too if that what it comes down to. I'd personally keep Weeger on LD because Murphy isn't as good at the Left side vs Right side. It's a good out of the box idea.
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 16
#6
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: Kosterjr
Looks good, Florida might want a better defensive prospect but solid


Carlsson is supposed to be pretty good, could be in the NHL next year probably. I'd be willing to do Strome for Weegar 1 for 1 but I just wanted to add a little something. If Borgstrom is someone you think Florida values more highly, you could drop the prospect swap aspect of this trade entirely honestly.
Kosterjr a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 18
#7
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: Beetlejuice
Weegar is a LD right? I thought his d partner was Eakblad


It's my understanding he can play both sides. I'd be fine with him on either side -- maybe swap him with Murphy and move the Weegar-Mitchell pair up in the lineup idk.
Kosterjr a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 22
#8
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,646
Mentions "j'aime": 12,369
Chicago should not trade Strome.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 22
#9
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,646
Mentions "j'aime": 12,369
Chicago should not trade Strome.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 29
#10
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: exo2769
I do think this will set our defense onto the correct path. Would still need Seabs to waive his NMC against Seattle Expansion. Heck...I'd extend him for a 1 year $800k deal for him to waive that too if that what it comes down to. I'd personally keep Weeger on LD because Murphy isn't as good at the Left side vs Right side. It's a good out of the box idea.


Oh man, I kinda forgot about that. Would have to think he would waive, but you never really know I guess. Hopefully he waives and they just give him their word not to trade him, if that's what he really wants.

As for Weegar, yeah, keeping him on the left side is fine. You could figure out the pairs later on, but play him (and everyone) where they're most comfortable/effective.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 37
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,227
Mentions "j'aime": 613
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
Carlsson is supposed to be pretty good, could be in the NHL next year probably. I'd be willing to do Strome for Weegar 1 for 1 but I just wanted to add a little something. If Borgstrom is someone you think Florida values more highly, you could drop the prospect swap aspect of this trade entirely honestly.


Unless Zito feels Borgstrom is a flop I’d take him out and do a 1 for 1
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 37
#12
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Chicago should not trade Strome.


Perhaps, no. I really like having three really strong centers down the middle (Toews, Dach, Strome) and I think that's part of the reason why we were so strong offensively last year. But, we do have guys coming up - Barratt still looks good and Kurashev and Suter can both play center. I really like Wallmark and am hoping he could be a long term 2-way option at 3C, although we have a while to see if that's what might actually happen. I like Strome a lot, would rather not trade him, but for the right price I think you have to consider it
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 45
#13
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,646
Mentions "j'aime": 12,369
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
Perhaps, no. I really like having three really strong centers down the middle (Toews, Dach, Strome) and I think that's part of the reason why we were so strong offensively last year. But, we do have guys coming up - Barratt still looks good and Kurashev and Suter can both play center. I really like Wallmark and am hoping he could be a long term 2-way option at 3C, although we have a while to see if that's what might actually happen. I like Strome a lot, would rather not trade him, but for the right price I think you have to consider it


Take the legit strength down the middle over the top 4 dman all day every day, Toews is getting older, Hawks have lots of D in the pipeline, I'd never make this deal if I was the Hawks GM.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 45
#14
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,646
Mentions "j'aime": 12,369
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
Perhaps, no. I really like having three really strong centers down the middle (Toews, Dach, Strome) and I think that's part of the reason why we were so strong offensively last year. But, we do have guys coming up - Barratt still looks good and Kurashev and Suter can both play center. I really like Wallmark and am hoping he could be a long term 2-way option at 3C, although we have a while to see if that's what might actually happen. I like Strome a lot, would rather not trade him, but for the right price I think you have to consider it


Take the legit strength down the middle over the top 4 dman all day every day, Toews is getting older, Hawks have lots of D in the pipeline, I'd never make this deal if I was the Hawks GM.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage