SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What I would have done

Créé par: PinkWhitney
Équipe: 2020-21 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 13 oct. 2020
Publié: 13 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Never would have resigned Dillon at that price.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 200 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Pánik, Richard
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
2.
WSH
  1. Virtanen, Jake [Droits de RFA]
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
3.
WSH
  1. Manson, Josh (2 000 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Clark, Kody
  2. Jensen, Nick
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de WSH
Logo de VGK
Logo de WSH
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de NJD
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $69 334 045 $419 749 $600 000 $12 165 955 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, C
RFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
50 000 $50 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 oct. 2020 à 4 h 58
#1
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,290
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
It seems that re-signing guys is the area where GMBM struggles the most. Almost always the player gets more term and/or higher AAV than expected. Granted, a lot of them have proven good for them (Wilson, Orlov, etc.) but the Dillon and Schultz contracts definitely seemed pricey.
PinkWhitney et Radu47 a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 5 h 2
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,998
Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
Quoting: krakowitz
It seems that re-signing guys is the area where GMBM struggles the most. Almost always the player gets more term and/or higher AAV than expected. Granted, a lot of them have proven good for them (Wilson, Orlov, etc.) but the Dillon and Schultz contracts definitely seemed pricey.


I think Schultz would urprise people with a solid D partner and more sheltered minutes/easier companion. But then again it appears they expect him to play 2RD.
krakowitz a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 5 h 9
#3
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,290
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
Quoting: PinkWhitney
I think Schultz would urprise people with a solid D partner and more sheltered minutes/easier companion. But then again it appears they expect him to play 2RD.


Yeah, clearly Laviolette thinks he can get 2017 Schultz to make a comeback paired with Orlov. I'm optimistic it'll work and we'll actually have three competent defensive pairs again, but who knows these days.
PinkWhitney a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 5 h 21
#4
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Yeah I'd almost bet my house on the Dillon contract getting bought out/unloaded on at least the 4th year

Will GMs ever understand/appreciate age decline?
13 oct. 2020 à 5 h 27
#5
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Radu47
Yeah I'd almost bet my house on the Dillon contract getting bought out/unloaded on at least the 4th year

Will GMs ever understand/appreciate age decline?


I think they mostly do understand it, but they get guys they don't think they can afford right now by paying them forever.

Quoting: PinkWhitney
I think Schultz would urprise people with a solid D partner and more sheltered minutes/easier companion. But then again it appears they expect him to play 2RD.


If 2nd pair stays Orlov and Jensen, then third pair can get very sheltered minutes, and whether Schultz is paired with Fehervary, Alexeyev, or Siegenthaler, he can help them get some points at evens. I think he'll mostly earn his money on the second power play unit, if the team starts actually playing two power play units and taking both seriously.
13 oct. 2020 à 13 h 23
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,998
Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
Quoting: Eli
I think they mostly do understand it, but they get guys they don't think they can afford right now by paying them forever.



If 2nd pair stays Orlov and Jensen, then third pair can get very sheltered minutes, and whether Schultz is paired with Fehervary, Alexeyev, or Siegenthaler, he can help them get some points at evens. I think he'll mostly earn his money on the second power play unit, if the team starts actually playing two power play units and taking both seriously.


I thought Orlov Jensen wasn't working out?
13 oct. 2020 à 14 h 15
#7
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: PinkWhitney
I thought Orlov Jensen wasn't working out?


I don't see why not. I think the only reason Jensen might be available would be cap space for a UFA, and the hope that TVR develops into Jensen. Together they played some tough zone stars and they each played against tough competition and did well. I don't want to spend all day running the numbers, but I think they're a good shutdown pair, even though together they sometimes got scored on by other teams' best lines. If you can find a defensive pair that never gets scored on, and actually plays big minutes, then obviously, they'd be better.
PinkWhitney a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage