Forums/Armchair-GM

Jensen Korpisalo

Créé par: Eli
Date de création initiale: oct 10, 2020
Publié: 10 oct 2020 à 15 h 34
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
Kovalchuk, Ilya1700 000 $
Transactions
TOR
  1. Jensen, Nick
Détails additionnels:
(if WSH intends Schultz to play a top four role and maybe they see their best shutodown D/PK specialist as a spare part)
WSH
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Mikheyev, Ilya [Droits de RFA]
TOR
  1. Korpisalo, Joonas
CBJ
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. 2021 2e round pick (TOR)
  3. 2023 4e round pick (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
  • Mikhail Grabovski: 0 $
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • Phil Kessel: 1 200 000 $ (15%)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2021
TOR
TOR
TOR
TOR
2022
TOR
TOR
TOR
TOR
TOR
TOR
TOR
2023
TOR
TOR
TOR
TOR
TOR
TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 446 450 $0 $0 $53 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
TOR
Johnsson, Andreas
3 400 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
TOR
Matthews, Auston
11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
TOR
Marner, Mitchell
10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
TOR
Hyman, Zach
2 250 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
TOR
Tavares, John
11 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
TOR
Nylander, William
6 962 366 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
TOR
Robertson, Nicholas
821 667 $
AG
RFA - 3
TOR
Kerfoot, Alexander
3 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
TOR
Simmonds, Wayne
1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Kovalchuk, Ilya
700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
TOR
Spezza, Jason
700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
TOR
Malgin, Denis
700 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
TOR
Muzzin, Jake
5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
TOR
Brodie, TJ
5 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
CBJ
Korpisalo, Joonas
2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
TOR
Rielly, Morgan
5 000 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
WSH
Jensen, Nick
2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
TOR
Campbell, Jack
1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
TOR
Sandin, Rasmus
894 167 $
DG
RFA - 2
TOR
Holl, Justin
2 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
TOR
Marincin, Martin
700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 oct 2020 à 15 h 42
#1
Its pretty mint.
Rejoint: jun 2017
Messages: 7,835
Mentions "j'aime": 4,239
Kovalchuk won’t play on a 4th line, he needs to play with good players.

And the CBJ trade is interesting. The Blue Jackets probably accept, since they get a 2nd, plus a 1 year rental that they don’t need to worry about losing for nothing to Seattle.

And I guess the Leafs could do it if they want more stability in net.
Eli et Jarmo a aimé ceci.
10 oct 2020 à 15 h 51
#2
Jarmo Kekalainen
Rejoint: jui 2018
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 158
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Kovalchuk won’t play on a 4th line, he needs to play with good players.

And the CBJ trade is interesting. The Blue Jackets probably accept, since they get a 2nd, plus a 1 year rental that they don’t need to worry about losing for nothing to Seattle.

And I guess the Leafs could do it if they want more stability in net.


Let me start this post by saying the Columbus Trade you have submitted is a good trade that helps both teams on the surface. It is not bad at all and in most cases I think we accept.

One Reason Why We Don't Accept this Good Trade:
1. We don't need two goalies that total over $9M to take money away from the players we are still trying to sign in Hall or Hoffman, Dubois and Gav.

One Reason Why We Accept this Good Trade:
1.Obviously an Upgrade over Korpisalo/Elvis duo. (Freddy's numbers would most likely be even better behind the CBJ defense.)
Eli et Kotkaniemi15 a aimé ceci.
10 oct 2020 à 15 h 59
#3
Rejoint: mar 2019
Messages: 1,089
Mentions "j'aime": 414
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Kovalchuk won’t play on a 4th line, he needs to play with good players.

And the CBJ trade is interesting. The Blue Jackets probably accept, since they get a 2nd, plus a 1 year rental that they don’t need to worry about losing for nothing to Seattle.

And I guess the Leafs could do it if they want more stability in net.


Elvis is still exempt, and we signed Kivlenieks to be our Seattle exposure. I don't think that return justifies us taking on significant cap hit. Doubtful.
Jarmo, Kotkaniemi15 et Eli a aimé ceci.
10 oct 2020 à 16 h 09
#4
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Rejoint: jui 2017
Messages: 11,705
Mentions "j'aime": 2,168
Quoting: benjgc
Elvis is still exempt, and we signed Kivlenieks to be our Seattle exposure. I don't think that return justifies us taking on significant cap hit. Doubtful.


Thanks. It sounds like this is an idea to come back to when Hall and Hoffman are off the table. Andersen is functionally only exposed if CBJ extend his deal. Otherwise, he's UFA next summer, and if Seattle claims him, he's still free to sign right back in Columbus if he has fun there, and I think he might. CBJ last year went barebones and surprised a lot of people with how well they've been drafting. They've cleared space so far and given no signs whether that's to make a big spashy addition, or just to save space to pay all the talented young guys they've developed. If it's the latter, Andersen's front-loaded contract makes him cheaper than Korpisalo this year by about $1.8M cash, but if it's the former, then I can see where Hall would be a more fun pickup than a goalie who hasn't been past the second round in a few years.
10 oct 2020 à 16 h 12
#5
Rejoint: mar 2019
Messages: 1,089
Mentions "j'aime": 414
Quoting: Eli
Thanks. It sounds like this is an idea to come back to when Hall and Hoffman are off the table. Andersen is functionally only exposed if CBJ extend his deal. Otherwise, he's UFA next summer, and if Seattle claims him, he's still free to sign right back in Columbus if he has fun there, and I think he might. CBJ last year went barebones and surprised a lot of people with how well they've been drafting. They've cleared space so far and given no signs whether that's to make a big spashy addition, or just to save space to pay all the talented young guys they've developed. If it's the latter, Andersen's front-loaded contract makes him cheaper than Korpisalo this year by about $1.8M cash, but if it's the former, then I can see where Hall would be a more fun pickup than a goalie who hasn't been past the second round in a few years.


If we're trading away Korpi, it's so Elvis can be our true starter and so we can add a true top-6 scoring winger. I don't see why we'd add a guy who's gonna want to be the 1A.
10 oct 2020 à 16 h 17
#6
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Rejoint: jui 2017
Messages: 11,705
Mentions "j'aime": 2,168
Quoting: benjgc
If we're trading away Korpi, it's so Elvis can be our true starter and so we can add a true top-6 scoring winger. I don't see why we'd add a guy who's gonna want to be the 1A.


If Elvis starts now, and keeps improving a bit, his next contract costs $8-10M per, for a while If Elvis is 1B this year behind Andersen, and next year behind whoever, his next contract costs $4-5M per, for a while.

Quoting: Jarmo
Let me start this post by saying the Columbus Trade you have submitted is a good trade that helps both teams on the surface. It is not bad at all and in most cases I think we accept.

One Reason Why We Don't Accept this Good Trade:
1. We don't need two goalies that total over $9M to take money away from the players we are still trying to sign in Hall or Hoffman, Dubois and Gav.

One Reason Why We Accept this Good Trade:
1.Obviously an Upgrade over Korpisalo/Elvis duo. (Freddy's numbers would most likely be even better behind the CBJ defense.)


Andersen earns $1M actual salary this year, and keeps Elvis from making $9M per year on his next contract. Can you tell us a little bit more about goalies doing better behind good defenses? I definitely see it with Bobrovsky in Florida, but I'm not sure we're all on the same page.

I'm equally fond of the Leafs and Jackets. If Columbus can sign Hall, they should. But if not, do you think a goalie who succeeded behind a questionable defense in Toronto could take Columbus on a run? Especially one who took Anaheim on a run?
10 oct 2020 à 16 h 20
#7
Rejoint: mar 2019
Messages: 1,089
Mentions "j'aime": 414
Quoting: Eli
If Elvis starts now, and keeps improving a bit, his next contract costs $8-10M per, for a while If Elvis is 1B this year behind Andersen, and next year behind whoever, his next contract costs $4-5M per, for a while.



Andersen earns $1M actual salary this year, and keeps Elvis from making $9M per year on his next contract. Can you tell us a little bit more about goalies doing better behind good defenses? I definitely see it with Bobrovsky in Florida, but I'm not sure we're all on the same page.

I'm equally fond of the Leafs and Jackets. If Columbus can sign Hall, they should. But if not, do you think a goalie who succeeded behind a questionable defense in Toronto could take Columbus on a run? Especially one who took Anaheim on a run?


... you think Elvis is getting Bobrovsky/Vasilevskiy money on his next deal? I'd be astonished, truly astonished. Hellboy is making just over $6M. I think you need to rein in your expectations a smidge.
Eli et Jarmo a aimé ceci.
10 oct 2020 à 16 h 39
#8
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Rejoint: jui 2017
Messages: 11,705
Mentions "j'aime": 2,168
Quoting: benjgc
... you think Elvis is getting Bobrovsky/Vasilevskiy money on his next deal? I'd be astonished, truly astonished. Hellboy is making just over $6M. I think you need to rein in your expectations a smidge.


Sure, sure. I'm already surprised he's making 4, though, on just a 35 game sample. If I ran the Blue Jackets, I'd probably keep Korpisalo, but offer Merz for Andersen, in order to clear cap in 21-22 and save around $7M in actual budget, for good players down the line. Probably no picks from Toronto on that little cap space, though.

edit: alternatively, if Columbus is looking for a top six wing, and Toronto's looking for cap space, getting Tor to drop the picks and throw in Johnsson might be good for both sides.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage