Quoting: benjgc
If we're trading away Korpi, it's so Elvis can be our true starter and so we can add a true top-6 scoring winger. I don't see why we'd add a guy who's gonna want to be the 1A.
If Elvis starts now, and keeps improving a bit, his next contract costs $8-10M per, for a while If Elvis is 1B this year behind Andersen, and next year behind whoever, his next contract costs $4-5M per, for a while.
Quoting: Jarmo
Let me start this post by saying the Columbus Trade you have submitted is a good trade that helps both teams on the surface. It is not bad at all and in most cases I think we accept.
One Reason Why We Don't Accept this Good Trade:
1. We don't need two goalies that total over $9M to take money away from the players we are still trying to sign in Hall or Hoffman, Dubois and Gav.
One Reason Why We Accept this Good Trade:
1.Obviously an Upgrade over Korpisalo/Elvis duo. (Freddy's numbers would most likely be even better behind the CBJ defense.)
Andersen earns $1M actual salary this year, and keeps Elvis from making $9M per year on his next contract. Can you tell us a little bit more about goalies doing better behind good defenses? I definitely see it with Bobrovsky in Florida, but I'm not sure we're all on the same page.
I'm equally fond of the Leafs and Jackets. If Columbus can sign Hall, they should. But if not, do you think a goalie who succeeded behind a questionable defense in Toronto could take Columbus on a run? Especially one who took Anaheim on a run?