Forums/NHL Signings

Colorado Avalanche signed André Burakovsky (2 Years / $4,900,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


10 oct. 2020 à 9 h 39
#1
André Burakovsky has signed a new contract with the Colorado Avalanche.
CONTRAT STANDARD
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
DURÉE: 2 ANS
STATUT À L’ÉCHÉANCE DU CONTRAT: UFA
CONTRAT SIGNÉ AVEC: Avalanche du ColoradoAvalanche du Colorado
VALEUR: 9 800 000 $
% DU C.H. : 6,01
DATE DE SIGNATURE: 10 octobre 2020
SOURCE: CapFriendly
SAISONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV BONIS DE PERFORMANCE BONIS DE SIGN. SALAIRE DE BASE SALAIRE TOTAL SALAIRE DES LIGUES MINEURES
2020-214 900 000 $4 900 000 $0 $0 $4 400 000 $4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
2021-224 900 000 $4 900 000 $0 $0 $5 400 000 $5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
TOTAL9 800 000 $9 800 000 $0 $0 $9 800 000 $9 800 000 $9 800 000 $
10 oct. 2020 à 9 h 42
#2
Western Champs
Rejoint: sept. 2015
Messages: 217
Mentions "j'aime": 203
Leading him straight to free agency yikes
Remus, KubaH, arafay and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
10 oct. 2020 à 9 h 42
#3
v5 CBJ GM
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 6,322
Good contract if he keeps his form from last year since that was about his only good year
10 oct. 2020 à 9 h 45
#4
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 6,103
Mentions "j'aime": 2,229
Good low AAV, but the term is terrible. Colorado has the cap space so why not spend now to save later.
10 oct. 2020 à 9 h 45
#5
Thanks Timmins
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 756
Mentions "j'aime": 606
Projections had him at long term for this AAV. He'll be a young UFA in 2 years and still touch a good amount of money for those two years.

A bit expensive but he was in good position for arbitration though, COL didnt want to end up there
10 oct. 2020 à 9 h 46
#6
Always in Pain
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 22,070
Mentions "j'aime": 13,955
Bad term, but it's hilarious that his AAV is smaller than Domi's and Anderson's.
ConnorMcHellebucyk, KubaH, Trickster and 2 others a aimé ceci.
10 oct. 2020 à 10 h 1
#7
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 6,369
Mentions "j'aime": 3,829
AAV is fine, but a 4 year term would have been much better
KubaH a aimé ceci.
10 oct. 2020 à 10 h 4
#8
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 459
Mentions "j'aime": 239
I voted no. Not because of the AAV or term. I hate the expiry status - the two-year deal leads him straight to free agency...
10 oct. 2020 à 10 h 17
#9
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,898
Mentions "j'aime": 888
Quoting: KubaH
I voted no. Not because of the AAV or term. I hate the expiry status - the two-year deal leads him straight to free agency...


Actually, this deal buys out one UFA year. He could've been a UFA next off-season. So overall, not a bad contract.
10 oct. 2020 à 10 h 19
#10
GM67
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 668
Mentions "j'aime": 307
I like that they signed him but the structure of the contract is not favorable. Good signing for two years BUT then it's not good.
10 oct. 2020 à 10 h 22
#11
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,898
Mentions "j'aime": 888
Quoting: jasondomitrovic
I like that they signed him but the structure of the contract is not favorable. Good signing for two years BUT then it's not good.


This isn't quite like the Domi deal. Burakovsky actually could've taken a 1 year deal and then go to UFA because of his years of service. This buys the Avs an extra year.
10 oct. 2020 à 10 h 24
#12
AwesomeMatthews
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,381
Mentions "j'aime": 1,008
By By in 2 years Andre.
10 oct. 2020 à 11 h 0
#13
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 242
Mentions "j'aime": 179
I like this deal. Burakovsky played a season where he looked like a 30 goal, 60 point winger. But it's one shortened season. Going longer term on that type of production could be an issue when this team does have some big contracts to contend with in a flat cap world over the next 3 years. Instead, they pay him a below market rate for what he did last year, and don't end up committing long term in the event he doesn't live up to it. This deal feels like the type of deal that happens in the NBA.

In a salary cap league, people spend far more time being worried about potentially having a player walk away for nothing despite the fact that cap space and flexibility have value. If you always give players big term, sometimes those contracts turn out to be a negative value and you wish you could walk away for nothing.

Burakovsky is not a core piece to this team, so avoiding longer terms is probably a good move. If he performs well, then you get two years of a player drastically out performing his cap hit. If he performs decently, then you aren't hurting that bad in his next negotiation, and if he performs poorly you dodge a bullet. You commit to a core of stars, and everyone else is interchangeable as the need arises.
10 oct. 2020 à 11 h 27
#14
You know nothing JS
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 2,233
Good for the Avs not taking to much term IMO.
NMAvsFan a aimé ceci.
10 oct. 2020 à 11 h 45
#15
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 934
Mentions "j'aime": 887
I think really should have locked him up considering how well he did in Colorado, but just in case he regresses to something similar like his last 2 years with Washington I guess 2 years is a good call.

There is a chance he’s expendable in two years, but I didn’t think the Avs had any major players in the system that would be ready and pushing for Burakovsky’s top 6 minutes by then.

Overall you’ve kept him for 2 years at a fair cap hit, good signing.
10 oct. 2020 à 11 h 49
#16
Representing the 505
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,196
Mentions "j'aime": 585
All things considered, this isn't necessarily a bad deal for the Avs. It sounds like Bura wanted to stay longer but I think there is a logic to having a guy that only had one good year on a short contract. And this is a contending team that is going to need to control the cap in the upcoming years to re-sign their home-grown guys to big deals. I might have asked for one more year at a lower AAV but that would have been it.
10 oct. 2020 à 12 h 50
#17
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 456
Mentions "j'aime": 381
Quoting: HabsForEver
Good low AAV, but the term is terrible. Colorado has the cap space so why not spend now to save later.


Because later they're going to have to give MacKinnon a $6 or $7 million raise
10 oct. 2020 à 14 h 1
#18
Banni
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 18,461
Mentions "j'aime": 4,697
Quoting: KubaH
I voted no. Not because of the AAV or term. I hate the expiry status - the two-year deal leads him straight to free agency...


Quoting: moli92
AAV is fine, but a 4 year term would have been much better


This guy had 1 career year and you handed him 4.9 million.
The past 3 years he's been a 12 goal guy.

I wouldn't be complaining about the term.
If anything I think this is a bit high avv.
10 oct. 2020 à 16 h 51
#19
PLZ FIRE BERGEVIN
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 96
Mentions "j'aime": 43
I love the AAV but I don't like the term this will lead him right to free agency. However I like that they are bringing him back it would have been nice if they added 1/2 more years
10 oct. 2020 à 21 h 28
#20
GM67
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 668
Mentions "j'aime": 307
He is with a good team and he should put up good numbers. This is a player that will thrive with better teammates as he's not a one man show type of guy. A bit high on the money but two years is fine.
11 oct. 2020 à 5 h 42
#21
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 188
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: pharrow
This guy had 1 career year and you handed him 4.9 million.
The past 3 years he's been a 12 goal guy.

I wouldn't be complaining about the term.
If anything I think this is a bit high avv.


You’re Wrong Bud. His AAV is fine. He’s been getting progressively better and a top 6 or 9 role. In COL. His numbers were low in Washington because he was rarely given a chance or PP time.
11 oct. 2020 à 14 h 5
#22
Banni
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 18,461
Mentions "j'aime": 4,697
Quoting: Dotz789
You’re Wrong Bud. His AAV is fine. He’s been getting progressively better and a top 6 or 9 role. In COL. His numbers were low in Washington because he was rarely given a chance or PP time.


you paid him based on his career high. you are seriously trying to argue that is ever a right move?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Soumettre les modifications du sondage