SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

WAYNE SIMMONDS

Créé par: LeafsFan4Ever34
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 9 oct. 2020
Publié: 9 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $77 609 783 $0 $400 000 $3 890 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 oct. 2020 à 12 h 11
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
The beatdown man has arrived
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2020 à 12 h 13
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
I get why they did it. It won't solve their problems. Putting players like that on 4th lines just doesn't work.
It's why the Tom Wilsons of the world get paid 5 mil per. You got to be good enough to play real ice time.
9 oct. 2020 à 12 h 21
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
Quoting: pharrow
I get why they did it. It won't solve their problems. Putting players like that on 4th lines just doesn't work.
It's why the Tom Wilsons of the world get paid 5 mil per. You got to be good enough to play real ice time.


Tampa won the cup and their top 6 (Stamkos-Point-Kucherov, Palat-Johnson-Killorn) had no power forwards or grinders. But their bottom 6 had Goodrow, Coleman, Maroon, Gourde & Verhaeghe, all big forecheckers known for winning puck battles. While ideal, it’s not mandatory to have a player of Wilson or Stone’s caliber to win the cup. But if your top forwards are all finesse, they need to be accommodated with gritty hardworking complimentary players.

Toronto has a lot more issues than just grit, but if their bottom 6 looks something like Engvall-Kerfoot-Mikheyev & Clifford-Spezza-Simmonds, it’s at least a start cuz they’ve got some heavy forecheckers on the wing.
9 oct. 2020 à 12 h 30
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,220
Mentions "j'aime": 538
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
Tampa won the cup and their top 6 (Stamkos-Point-Kucherov, Palat-Johnson-Killorn) had no power forwards or grinders. But their bottom 6 had Goodrow, Coleman, Maroon, Gourde & Verhaeghe, all big forecheckers known for winning puck battles. While ideal, it’s not mandatory to have a player of Wilson or Stone’s caliber to win the cup. But if your top forwards are all finesse, they need to be accommodated with gritty hardworking complimentary players.

Toronto has a lot more issues than just grit, but if their bottom 6 looks something like Engvall-Kerfoot-Mikheyev & Clifford-Spezza-Simmonds, it’s at least a start cuz they’ve got some heavy forecheckers on the wing.


that 3rd line averaged 18 mins a night, they played effective hockey too not just banging and crashing
9 oct. 2020 à 12 h 30
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
Tampa won the cup and their top 6 (Stamkos-Point-Kucherov, Palat-Johnson-Killorn) had no power forwards or grinders. But their bottom 6 had Goodrow, Coleman, Maroon, Gourde & Verhaeghe, all big forecheckers known for winning puck battles. While ideal, it’s not mandatory to have a player of Wilson or Stone’s caliber to win the cup. But if your top forwards are all finesse, they need to be accommodated with gritty hardworking complimentary players.

Toronto has a lot more issues than just grit, but if their bottom 6 looks something like Engvall-Kerfoot-Mikheyev & Clifford-Spezza-Simmonds, it’s at least a start cuz they’ve got some heavy forecheckers on the wing.


And while I get your point.
TB was also willing to mix and match those guys.
And players like Goodrow, Coleman and Verhaeghe area ll younger guys with legs who can still fly up and down the ice. The only older player they added was Maroon, who is still effective as a 4th liner.
You got to still have legs to be on the ice and effective.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage