SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

draft day deals

Créé par: Tylerh
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 oct. 2020
Publié: 6 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
gonna be a lot of comments says so and so says no...i dont care i like it
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 900 000 $
43 500 000 $
11 200 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Ekblad, Aaron (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Wallmark, Lucas [Droits de RFA]
  3. Weegar, MacKenzie [Droits de RFA]
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
3.
TOR
  1. Kuemper, Darcy (1 500 000 $ retained)
ARI
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 799 783 $0 $0 $1 700 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 43
#1
VGKNation702
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,598
Why does Florida do that? And next years first? Doesn’t make a ton of sense for them at all
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 43
#2
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
There is no way Florida moves Ekblad without a significant piece going in the opposite direction, and Arizona is trying to get rid of salary for next season not take on more.
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,135
Mentions "j'aime": 5,933
Of course you like it you're robbing every team blind tears of joy
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,640
Mentions "j'aime": 2,513
Florida trade is brutal
Arizona does not need 3 goalies
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 45
#5
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Trading your teams 2 best dmen and a solid prospect, and get nothing of consequence in return? Bold strategy, Florida...
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,797
Mentions "j'aime": 564
I get that you like it, but maybe you could provide some detail about why you think these moves are realistic? Arizona has extra goalies, no chance they want another one (and no chance they retain salary).

Florida has lost out of huge value here, why would they make this move? How does it help their team get better?

Starting an ACGM thread is like starting a conversation. You can't start a conversation with saying "who cares, I'm right." Tell people who you're right, discuss what you were thinking.
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 52
#7
Clears4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 101
Mentions "j'aime": 34
Quoting: jcash08
There is no way Florida moves Ekblad without a significant piece going in the opposite direction, and Arizona is trying to get rid of salary for next season not take on more.


Andersen is only owed $1M in salary. He received $4M via bonus already.
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 57
#8
Démarrer sujet
tylerh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 486
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: jcash08
There is no way Florida moves Ekblad without a significant piece going in the opposite direction, and Arizona is trying to get rid of salary for next season not take on more.


Quoting: jcash08
There is no way Florida moves Ekblad without a significant piece going in the opposite direction, and Arizona is trying to get rid of salary for next season not take on more.


They would be getting rid of salary. Freddie is only owed 1 million next season, its his cap hit that is 5 million so Kuemper costs more in real money which is what Arizona are trying to save
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 58
#9
Démarrer sujet
tylerh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 486
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: VGKNation702
Why does Florida do that? And next years first? Doesn’t make a ton of sense for them at all


Because ownership told them to shed 10m
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 59
#10
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Clears4
Andersen is only owed $1M in salary. He received $4M via bonus already.


They are still retaining 1.5M across two years, they wont be spending 3M on a player not playing for them in this salary crunch.
6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 1
#11
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Tylerh
They would be getting rid of salary. Freddie is only owed 1 million next season, its his cap hit that is 5 million so Kuemper costs more in real money which is what Arizona are trying to save


They still have to pay him 3M, they will not be paying players to not play for them.
6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 1
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,227
Mentions "j'aime": 613
Quoting: Tylerh
Because ownership told them to shed 10m


Wrong...Zito was asked about that when he was hired and he stated that he hasn’t been given any such mandate to cut payroll.
6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 5
#13
Démarrer sujet
tylerh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 486
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: newballcoach
I get that you like it, but maybe you could provide some detail about why you think these moves are realistic? Arizona has extra goalies, no chance they want another one (and no chance they retain salary).

Florida has lost out of huge value here, why would they make this move? How does it help their team get better?

Starting an ACGM thread is like starting a conversation. You can't start a conversation with saying "who cares, I'm right." Tell people who you're right, discuss what you were thinking.


i didnt say ''I'm right". and it doesnt matter who you trade or sign the only comments you get on this site is people comments ''no from ______'' Ive viewed hundreds or maybe thousands of acgm's and its all the same, if it were up to the people that use this site there wouldnt be another trade in the history of the league because everyone over values their own players. Leaf haters would of said no way can you get a first for Kapanen but they did, no way they can sign Tavares but they did. I create acgms because its fun and passes time not because i care what others think or think that the trades i purpose will actually happen
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 6
#14
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Winnipeg says yes. But the other 2 say no, they don't care what you think unfortunatly.
6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 6
#15
Démarrer sujet
tylerh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 486
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Kosterjr
Wrong...Zito was asked about that when he was hired and he stated that he hasn’t been given any such mandate to cut payroll.


Trump said that covid isnt dangerous too
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 9
#16
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Quoting: Tylerh
i didnt say ''I'm right". and it doesnt matter who you trade or sign the only comments you get on this site is people comments ''no from ______'' Ive viewed hundreds or maybe thousands of acgm's and its all the same, if it were up to the people that use this site there wouldnt be another trade in the history of the league because everyone over values their own players. Leaf haters would of said no way can you get a first for Kapanen but they did, no way they can sign Tavares but they did. I create acgms because its fun and passes time not because i care what others think or think that the trades i purpose will actually happen


It is kind of funny. All those leafs haters were saying Kapanen would get a late second. If you were to suggest even the 31th overall pick they would tear you apart. You do whatever you want, I do not care.
6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 31
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,227
Mentions "j'aime": 613
Quoting: Tylerh
Trump said that covid isnt dangerous too


Trump is also a pathological liar so...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage