SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

An Alternative View

Créé par: leafsfan123456
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 5 oct. 2020
Publié: 5 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
2700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
11 200 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (DET)
Détails additionnels:
Any team. Doesn't matter.
2.
TOR
  1. Korpisalo, Joonas
  2. Savard, David
Détails additionnels:
Leafs get a rental defenseman and a 1B goalie.
CBJ
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Columbus gets a mid first round pick and a top 6 winger.
Johnson = Korpisalo. Savard = 1st round pick
3.
TOR
  1. Murphy, Connor
Détails additionnels:
Leafs get the top 4 shutdown defenseman.
CHI
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. Dermott, Travis
Détails additionnels:
Chicago downgrades on defense in exchange for an upgrade in net.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
Logo de DET
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 922 283 $0 $400 000 $3 577 717 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 062 500 $1 062 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 oct. 2020 à 21 h 9
#1
Bar up
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 483
Mentions "j'aime": 67
Spezza 3rd line ya no
5 oct. 2020 à 21 h 10
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Leafs aren't throwing Holl away for nothing, he's not a cap dump. Makes a pretty good pairing with Muzzin.

Columbus deal is meh. Don't think the Leafs are trading the 15th pick unless it's for a bigger impact player like a d-man, and Columbus has said they want a centre for one of their goalies. But value is decent I guess, just not realistic.

Leafs aren't moving the better, younger, cheaper d-man AND adding in a top 10 goalie for a #4-5 d-man. Easy pass.
benjgc a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2020 à 21 h 12
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 698
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Chicago isnt taking Andersen and that contract
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2020 à 21 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 840
Mentions "j'aime": 211
I would say the Chicago value is technically there but they don’t make this deal. Too many options in free agency and they’re not in win now mode. Better off keeping Murphy.
5 oct. 2020 à 21 h 26
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,704
Mentions "j'aime": 888
I agree with @Ryminister_27 that the Blue Jackets decline this offer. Columbus has repeatedly said they won't move either half of their goalie tandem as part of any deal that doesn't return a 2C to Columbus. You've offered us a middle-6 wing (nobody's mistaking Mango for top-line material) and a first-round pick. Not saying the value is WILDLY off, but it doesn't seem like it advances us enough towards our goal.
5 oct. 2020 à 21 h 55
#6
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,635
Mentions "j'aime": 9,740
I guess Andersen is an upgrade to Delia, but Crow >>> Freddie.
ChiHawk et thesaadfather a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2020 à 22 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,039
Mentions "j'aime": 369
we want to keep Murphy
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2020 à 22 h 40
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: exo2769
I guess Andersen is an upgrade to Delia, but Crow >>> Freddie.


Lol. Andersen is a top 10 goalie, Crawford is closer to top 15 or 20. But sure. Keep the older, worse goalie.
6 oct. 2020 à 0 h 23
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,026
Mentions "j'aime": 9,322
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Lol. Andersen is a top 10 goalie, Crawford is closer to top 15 or 20. But sure. Keep the older, worse goalie.


Review the stats; if you had you'd clearly realize Crow is the better goalie sitting behind a worse defense then the Leafs. How many times did Andersen get pulled this year; 5 times? How many big games has Andersen shown up for? How many rings....never mind you're not worth the time
6 oct. 2020 à 7 h 14
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Modifié 6 oct. 2020 à 8 h 13
Quoting: ChiHawk
Review the stats; if you had you'd clearly realize Crow is the better goalie sitting behind a worse defense then the Leafs. How many times did Andersen get pulled this year; 5 times? How many big games has Andersen shown up for? How many rings....never mind you're not worth the time


Dude, go the **** away. Stop whining to the moderators about me and then telling me every time you comment that I'm "not worth the time". Grow the **** up kid and leave me alone already. Jesus.
6 oct. 2020 à 9 h 13
#11
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,635
Mentions "j'aime": 9,740
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Lol. Andersen is a top 10 goalie, Crawford is closer to top 15 or 20. But sure. Keep the older, worse goalie.


Ry guy... You're never about to provide the amount of information I'm going to dump on you. BUT please provide support and I'll read it.

Crow >>> Freddie

Crow last year was the single best goalie in the entire NHL when it came to high danger situations. Freddie Anderson was 48th in the NHL. (***That's after I filtered the goalies for a min 1000 minutes to remove the rif raf/one off situations) That doesn't mean Freddie will be bad in the future. BUT he wasn't good last year. TOR defense was actually better than Chicago's too. There's a 19 goal differential here...and this is ONLY High Danger situations. This is a HUGE difference and it's an important stat. So what happens when your defense is bad??? Freddie failed while Crow stood tall. HUGE difference. Leaf's were 25th in Goals allowed. Only changing goalies for high danger situations...ALONE....would have made them 13th. AND that's just 23% of the chances. sooo...The Leafs would likely be top 10...if they had Crow last year.

There's obviously a lot that goes into this. It's not as easy as plug one guy in vs the other. I blame Keefe more than Babs for running Freddie into the ground. They need a real backup...not Hutch...not Campbell. A real one, but they don't have one and they don't have the cap space for one either. All that said Crow/Freddie are NOT "very much the same".

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/playerteams.php?fromseason=20192020&thruseason=20192020&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&stdoi=g&rate=n&team=ALL&pos=S&loc=B&toi=1000&gpfilt=none&fd=&td=&tgp=410&lines=single&draftteam=ALL

Crow's been better than Freddie for a long time. Not just this year....in fact there's only been 1 year in his last 5 years where Freddie's been better than Crow. NOW, if you were to say injuries...ok, but Crow's last injury was 3 years ago. A factor...sure, but not likely a huge factor. Crow should 100% tandem, but he's also 100% better than Freddie.
thesaadfather et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 9 h 41
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: exo2769
Ry guy... You're never about to provide the amount of information I'm going to dump on you. BUT please provide support and I'll read it.

Crow >>> Freddie

Crow last year was the single best goalie in the entire NHL when it came to high danger situations. Freddie Anderson was 48th in the NHL. (***That's after I filtered the goalies for a min 1000 minutes to remove the rif raf/one off situations) That doesn't mean Freddie will be bad in the future. BUT he wasn't good last year. TOR defense was actually better than Chicago's too. There's a 19 goal differential here...and this is ONLY High Danger situations. This is a HUGE difference and it's an important stat. So what happens when your defense is bad??? Freddie failed while Crow stood tall. HUGE difference. Leaf's were 25th in Goals allowed. Only changing goalies for high danger situations...ALONE....would have made them 13th. AND that's just 23% of the chances. sooo...The Leafs would likely be top 10...if they had Crow last year.

There's obviously a lot that goes into this. It's not as easy as plug one guy in vs the other. I blame Keefe more than Babs for running Freddie into the ground. They need a real backup...not Hutch...not Campbell. A real one, but they don't have one and they don't have the cap space for one either. All that said Crow/Freddie are NOT "very much the same".

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/playerteams.php?fromseason=20192020&thruseason=20192020&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&stdoi=g&rate=n&team=ALL&pos=S&loc=B&toi=1000&gpfilt=none&fd=&td=&tgp=410&lines=single&draftteam=ALL

Crow's been better than Freddie for a long time. Not just this year....in fact there's only been 1 year in his last 5 years where Freddie's been better than Crow. NOW, if you were to say injuries...ok, but Crow's last injury was 3 years ago. A factor...sure, but not likely a huge factor. Crow should 100% tandem, but he's also 100% better than Freddie.


Don't feel like reading an essay, sorry.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage