SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Roster Attempt 18

Créé par: NJ11
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 5 oct. 2020
Publié: 5 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
1750 000 $
2850 000 $
22 750 000 $
1850 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de NJD
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 240 000 $0 $1 127 500 $7 260 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 oct. 2020 à 18 h 58
#1
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
He’ll stay in NY if that’s the contract he takes...
5 oct. 2020 à 19 h 5
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Yeah I hate it. Soder is pretty cooked, and I really am not much of a fan of Fast.
5 oct. 2020 à 19 h 8
#3
Démarrer sujet
JonesIS(not)aStarter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: papishark
Yeah I hate it. Soder is pretty cooked, and I really am not much of a fan of Fast.


Who do we go with at 3C and 3RW? That's about the only questions left for this team I think with regard to the roster they'll ice next season
5 oct. 2020 à 19 h 43
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: NJ11
Who do we go with at 3C and 3RW? That's about the only questions left for this team I think with regard to the roster they'll ice next season


I think we have the real problem in 1st line RW. 3rw can be filled internally. The top six is the problem. I see Donato as a third liner with Jumbo, and maybe Gregor too. Labanc can play well with Kane-Hertl so we just need someone for Meier-Couture.
NJ11 a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2020 à 21 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,218
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
Quoting: papishark
I think we have the real problem in 1st line RW. 3rw can be filled internally. The top six is the problem. I see Donato as a third liner with Jumbo, and maybe Gregor too. Labanc can play well with Kane-Hertl so we just need someone for Meier-Couture.


Meier can play RW very well so I don't necessarily think its a "we need a RW specifically" sort of situation. The problem is finding someone (ANYONE) who's gonna be affordable who's good enough to play in the top 6 and produce well - bonus points if we sign them in FA or don't have to give up any 1sts or 2nds. I have no clue who fits that bill though.
papishark a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 2 h 35
#6
Démarrer sujet
JonesIS(not)aStarter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: papishark
I think we have the real problem in 1st line RW. 3rw can be filled internally. The top six is the problem. I see Donato as a third liner with Jumbo, and maybe Gregor too. Labanc can play well with Kane-Hertl so we just need someone for Meier-Couture.


I think Donato is a second liner. If he can score 14 with limited ice time and subpar linemates imagine what he does with Hertl and Meier who can create space for him with their physicality and playmaking. Now they could try and get a top-line RW but it's better to spend a figure like 6 mil on a 3C and 3RW because if the next season starts and its a crammed 82 game schedule we need more depth to compete. I also think 41-year-old Joe Thornton should be sheltered so he stays fresh and ready for what looks like potentially his last playoff push. That's my opinion anyway because having contracts in the 2-4 mil range are easier to trade for assets if they want to blow it up as compared to adding another expensive contract that's hard to move.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage