SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Danault makes too much sense

Créé par: Ragsandbluesfan
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 4 oct. 2020
Publié: 4 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
2750 000 $
1882 000 $
55 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lafreniere, Alexis
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Niku, Sami [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Strome, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
2.
NYR
  1. Alzner, Karl
  2. Danault, Phillip
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
MTL
  1. Howden, Brett
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 462 632 $0 $8 062 500 $1 037 368 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Lafreniere, Alexis
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
882 000 $882 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 oct. 2020 à 23 h 48
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Danault makes too much senses
Bad offer for MTL
Danault on the 3rd line ?????
4 oct. 2020 à 23 h 49
#2
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: GMs
Danault makes too much senses
Bad offer for MTL
Danault on the 3rd line ?????


Mentoring the 2 young french kids and it gives actual linemates to chytil to help him develop, danault will still get his fair share of ice time though, a 1st and a young C with NHL experience isn't a bad offer
5 oct. 2020 à 0 h 6
#3
Next Gen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,334
Mentions "j'aime": 269
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Mentoring the 2 young french kids and it gives actual linemates to chytil to help him develop, danault will still get his fair share of ice time though, a 1st and a young C with NHL experience isn't a bad offer


i understand the sentiment of getting him but that offer is horrendous for NYR. We have panarin ziba, krieder all great leaders/teachers we do not need danualt for that
5 oct. 2020 à 0 h 7
#4
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: Bloodykisame
i understand the sentiment of getting him but that offer is horrendous for NYR. We have panarin ziba, krieder all great leaders/teachers we do not need danualt for that


Mika is the only one who can play on the same line as him and he doesnt have the complete defensive game that danault has and can use to teach laf because the offense will come to him easily
5 oct. 2020 à 0 h 10
#5
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,991
Mentions "j'aime": 2,842
I don't think Danault would stay if he's going to be a 3C, he was frustrated with his offensive time as is. if he's moved it's for a 2C role.
5 oct. 2020 à 0 h 17
#6
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Normally i'd love this but if we move Danault its not to bring in a Center as we still need to move Domi to wing as is

I actually love the package though so ignoring MTL's got way to many Centers right now its value is fair.
Personally i'd love Brendan Lemieux in the package as he's currently everything MTL needs adding Size and Hitting power with the added benefit of him being a good fighter known to protect his team mates which we need Desperately.

Howdens better then Lemieux its just MTL's LW Is our issue long term as is the lack of hitting power in our bottom 6 since Thompson departed.
I know NYR likely wouldnt want to give up Lemieux but its how you get this deal done i think as we simply dont need another center unless he can put up 20-30 points a year while Hitting , Blocking shots and winning 53-55% faceoffs .

Domi's been great up until the Pandemic with 116 points in 154 games since switching to Center for the first time since AA hockey with a 44% win rate year one and 49% win rate year two as he becomes more well rounded and adjusted to the position. Suzuki's been a stud and needs no hype . Kotkanemi has come back strong with the Pandemic buying him the time he needed to heal his injuries and heal his body . Evans and Poehling could both make a case for playing 4th Center with Evans earning the right to play 4th line RW thus far and looking for an upgrade .

Tatar-Suzuki-Gallagher
Drouin-Domi-Armia
Byron-Kotkanemi-Lehkonen
Lemieux-Poehling-Evans(size,speed and with grit will see them get 11-13 minutes in MTL system before special teams as long as the hit often and hard.)

MTL in this scenario is in a prime position and they could also bring Thompson back to help Poehling manage the work load hoping he has even half the impact on Poehling he had playing 20 games with Suzuki as Nick credits him for turning his season around it only makes sense to go to the well again with Poehling this time.
Pmanningno2 a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2020 à 0 h 42
#7
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: Billy739
Normally i'd love this but if we move Danault its not to bring in a Center as we still need to move Domi to wing as is

I actually love the package though so ignoring MTL's got way to many Centers right now its value is fair.
Personally i'd love Brendan Lemieux in the package as he's currently everything MTL needs adding Size and Hitting power with the added benefit of him being a good fighter known to protect his team mates which we need Desperately.

Howdens better then Lemieux its just MTL's LW Is our issue long term as is the lack of hitting power in our bottom 6 since Thompson departed.
I know NYR likely wouldnt want to give up Lemieux but its how you get this deal done i think as we simply dont need another center unless he can put up 20-30 points a year while Hitting , Blocking shots and winning 53-55% faceoffs .

Domi's been great up until the Pandemic with 116 points in 154 games since switching to Center for the first time since AA hockey with a 44% win rate year one and 49% win rate year two as he becomes more well rounded and adjusted to the position. Suzuki's been a stud and needs no hype . Kotkanemi has come back strong with the Pandemic buying him the time he needed to heal his injuries and heal his body . Evans and Poehling could both make a case for playing 4th Center with Evans earning the right to play 4th line RW thus far and looking for an upgrade .

Tatar-Suzuki-Gallagher
Drouin-Domi-Armia
Byron-Kotkanemi-Lehkonen
Lemieux-Poehling-Evans(size,speed and with grit will see them get 11-13 minutes in MTL system before special teams as long as the hit often and hard.)

MTL in this scenario is in a prime position and they could also bring Thompson back to help Poehling manage the work load hoping he has even half the impact on Poehling he had playing 20 games with Suzuki as Nick credits him for turning his season around it only makes sense to go to the well again with Poehling this time.


I'd only move lemieux for lehkonen
5 oct. 2020 à 0 h 44
#8
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: NickC1988
I don't think Danault would stay if he's going to be a 3C, he was frustrated with his offensive time as is. if he's moved it's for a 2C role.


He'll get ice time playing with laf, and hes gonna be our #1 PK'er too
5 oct. 2020 à 10 h 44
#9
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Modifié 5 oct. 2020 à 10 h 54
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Mika is the only one who can play on the same line as him and he doesnt have the complete defensive game that danault has and can use to teach laf because the offense will come to him easily



Mika has a very complete defensive game!
5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 37
#10
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: AJC13
Mika has a very complete defensive game!


Nothing like danault
5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 50
#11
go hard or go home
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 8
Mentions "j'aime": 2
I like the value from a Mtl standpoint, as long as it's a part of a plan where we need the Alzner cap space (i.e. deal for Laine or a T.Hall signing). As it stands right now tho, we still can afford to eat Alzner's contract and maximize Danault's value (as a member of the team as well as in a trade). And if we can convince Danult to sign ands stay long term, I have no problem with the idea of a strong and deep center line.
OlegP a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 53
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Alzner isnt difficult to move as people think. Low salary. Add to the fact that they dont need to move him this year. Next year could be easily done for a 3rd rounder. Alzner shouldn't be included in any trade talks this year. Habs dont need the extra cap, he'll go to the minors. Next season will be bought out most likely.

Danault isnt going anywhere. Bergevin has been talking with his camp, same agency as Petry.
5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 55
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Quoting: Sherwoo9
I like the value from a Mtl standpoint, as long as it's a part of a plan where we need the Alzner cap space (i.e. deal for Laine or a T.Hall signing). As it stands right now tho, we still can afford to eat Alzner's contract and maximize Danault's value (as a member of the team as well as in a trade). And if we can convince Danult to sign ands stay long term, I have no problem with the idea of a strong and deep center line.


You got it. Meaningless to dump Alzner unless they pull a miracle (which they wont) with Hall or Laine
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage