SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Awesome Middle-Six

Créé par: Flames22
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 3 oct. 2020
Publié: 4 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I really like the idea of a Tkachuk - Bennett - Lindholm second line. Also love the idea of a Mangiapane - Backlund - Dubé third line. I think this could be a very solid team.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
22 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
65 500 000 $
53 750 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Virtanen, Jake [Droits de RFA]
VAN
  1. Kylington, Oliver [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 509 999 $0 $1 307 500 $8 990 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
733 333 $733 333 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 oct. 2020 à 17 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
what the **** is this crap? Virtanen is a bottom 6 winger that was a healthy scratch in the playoffs.
4 oct. 2020 à 17 h 22
#2
Démarrer sujet
Flames22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 225
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: MethodMan
what the **** is this crap? Virtanen is a bottom 6 winger that was a healthy scratch in the playoffs.


Well, the point of this ACGM is to highlight the solid middle-six that this team could have, that's where I spent most of my time. I just put in a top line RW that would work with cap. That being said, I think Virtanen would play a similar role to the one that Hudler played a couple of years ago. Maybe not the best player in the world, but will keep up with Gaudreau and Monahan/be a good complement.
4 oct. 2020 à 17 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: Flames22
Well, the point of this ACGM is to highlight the solid middle-six that this team could have, that's where I spent most of my time. I just put in a top line RW that would work with cap. That being said, I think Virtanen would play a similar role to the one that Hudler played a couple of years ago. Maybe not the best player in the world, but will keep up with Gaudreau and Monahan/be a good complement.

Improving the middle 6 by aborting the top line doesn't make this better
4 oct. 2020 à 17 h 41
#4
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: MethodMan
Improving the middle 6 by aborting the top line doesn't make this better


Anyway your core has done nothing in the playoffs for half a decade now, you REALLY need to retool
4 oct. 2020 à 17 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 105
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: MethodMan
Improving the middle 6 by aborting the top line doesn't make this better


And swearing/insulting people doesn't make you intelligent nor does it encourage people to see your point of view. People skills clearly isn't your strong suit eh? I'd love to open up one of these threads involving the Flames and not see your ignorant hot taeks in the comments. Sadly, trolling is the only thing you seem to know how to do effectively.

Quoting: Flames22
Well, the point of this ACGM is to highlight the solid middle-six that this team could have, that's where I spent most of my time. I just put in a top line RW that would work with cap. That being said, I think Virtanen would play a similar role to the one that Hudler played a couple of years ago. Maybe not the best player in the world, but will keep up with Gaudreau and Monahan/be a good complement.


I'm not sure Virtanen has the same skillset as Hudler (lack creativity and vision) but may be a Ferland comparable. I'm not sure you'll have to trade for him though as the Canucks can't afford to qualify him so he may just become a UFA at which point they could acquire him on a "prove it" contract without expending assets. I'd also suggest maybe he stay to the bottom 6 until you see if the reputation of his work ethic is accurate or not. Definitely worth a look though!
4 oct. 2020 à 17 h 59
#6
MadGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 333
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: MethodMan
what the **** is this crap? Virtanen is a bottom 6 winger that was a healthy scratch in the playoffs.


Hey Method man....relax. I've seen a few of your post and just so you know, this isn't real, you aren't a real GM, it's supposed to be for fun. I think you get my point, or do you. Take it easy, try and give some constructive criticism instead of the negatively betraying ones thus far. Unlikely you would talk to many of these people face to face like that.
4 oct. 2020 à 18 h 27
#7
Démarrer sujet
Flames22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 225
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: Different_Perspective_85
I'm not sure Virtanen has the same skillset as Hudler (lack creativity and vision) but may be a Ferland comparable. I'm not sure you'll have to trade for him though as the Canucks can't afford to qualify him so he may just become a UFA at which point they could acquire him on a "prove it" contract without expending assets. I'd also suggest maybe he stay to the bottom 6 until you see if the reputation of his work ethic is accurate or not. Definitely worth a look though!


Good points on Virtanen. I liked Ferland on that line back in the day because he had a good shot and was pretty good at supporting Gaudreau and Monahan, without doing anything too complicated. Haven't watched a lot of Virtanen but it sounds like he could be similar.
4 oct. 2020 à 22 h 30
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: Westerner
Hey Method man....relax. I've seen a few of your post and just so you know, this isn't real, you aren't a real GM, it's supposed to be for fun. I think you get my point, or do you. Take it easy, try and give some constructive criticism instead of the negatively betraying ones thus far. Unlikely you would talk to many of these people face to face like that.


Really it's not real? I had no idea

I speak my mind, don't like it, too bad.
4 oct. 2020 à 22 h 35
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: Different_Perspective_85
And swearing/insulting people doesn't make you intelligent nor does it encourage people to see your point of view. People skills clearly isn't your strong suit eh? I'd love to open up one of these threads involving the Flames and not see your ignorant hot taeks in the comments. Sadly, trolling is the only thing you seem to know how to do effectively.
I'm in trouble for swearing? What is this third grade? I didn't insult the guy, just said the idea was bad. As for my people skills, they are fine. I simply don't care what a bunch of people online think about me. Calling out stupid proposals isn't trolling, and being an asshole isn't the same as being a troll.
5 oct. 2020 à 1 h 23
#10
RifRaf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 106
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: MethodMan
I'm in trouble for swearing? What is this third grade? I didn't insult the guy, just said the idea was bad. As for my people skills, they are fine. I simply don't care what a bunch of people online think about me. Calling out stupid proposals isn't trolling, and being an asshole isn't the same as being a troll.


So your just a bully behind a key board then? Thats worse that an actually bully. You should review the form rules and then show a little class. If you don’t like his proposal fine say why no need to be insulting. See you did provide a well crafted argument on your second post, but I don't think people took it seriously due to-your first post. Then when they called you on your first comment you double down on post three and stooping toi a new low.
5 oct. 2020 à 5 h 22
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: Old_Flames_Fan
So your just a bully behind a key board then? Thats worse that an actually bully. You should review the form rules and then show a little class. If you don’t like his proposal fine say why no need to be insulting. See you did provide a well crafted argument on your second post, but I don't think people took it seriously due to-your first post. Then when they called you on your first comment you double down on post three and stooping toi a new low.

Calling a bad idea bad isn't bullying, nor is it insulting. Unless a person is a prick, I stick to my opinion of their post/proposal. If not wearing kid gloves because someone can't handle their armchair GM idea being called terrible, makes me worse than a bully in your eyes... well then I feel like you might be lucky enough to have never been bullied.
5 oct. 2020 à 21 h 34
#12
MadGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 333
Mentions "j'aime": 18
LOL wow
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage