SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Staal trade as a guide Year 2

Créé par: Seider53
Équipe: 2021-22 Red Wings de Detroit
Date de création initiale: 4 oct. 2020
Publié: 4 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Detroit continues making moves similar to the Staal trade in the 2020 and 2021 offseason, nothing spectacular like other AGM's have suggested.
No racking up 5 1sts in the 2022 draft. Ice a passable product in 20/21, finish last still, but with around 30 wins and around 70 points. Lose the lottery again, obviously and pick Power at ~4th.
While the trades seem a bit cautious, it leaves Detroit with an Average of 5 picks in the top 2 rounds of each of the next 3 drafts.
The Vancouver trade gets a slightly higher return than Staal as Vancouver's 2021 offseason carries more urgency than NYR's 2020.
Detroit doesn't look much at free agency until after the 2022 draft, the team below finishes about 27th but finally wins a draft lottery and snags Shane Wright.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
44 200 000 $
56 750 000 $
11 450 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
34 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Raymond, Lucas
3925 000 $
Power, Owen
3925 000 $
Askarov, Yaroslav
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
DET
  1. Johnson, Jack
  2. Joseph, Pierre-Olivier
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
2020 offseason
PIT
2.
DET
  1. Fleury, Marc-André
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
2020 Draft
VGK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
3.
DET
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
4.
DET
  1. Turris, Kyle
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NSH)
NSH
    Future Considerations
    5.
    DET
    1. DiPietro, Michael
    Détails additionnels:
    2020 Offseason, Packaged with Sutter as compensation.
    VAN
      Future Considerations
      6.
      DET
      1. Kerfoot, Alexander
      2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
      TOR
      1. Erne, Adam [Droits de RFA]
      2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
      7.
      DET
      TBL
      1. Timashov, Dmytro [Droits de RFA]
      Détails additionnels:
      Expansion Draft
      8.
      DET
      1. Eriksson, Loui
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
      3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
      Détails additionnels:
      '22 3rd conditional on games played. If under ~40 becomes a 2nd.
      VAN
      1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
      Détails additionnels:
      Detroit's latest pick in the 2nd, Detroit in essence moves up ~30 spots.
      9.
      DET
      1. Shaw, Andrew
      2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
      CHI
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Enfoui
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de DET
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de DET
      Logo de WSH
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de DET
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de DET
      Logo de DET
      Logo de DET
      2021
      Logo de DET
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de DET
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de DET
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de DET
      Logo de DET
      Logo de DET
      Logo de DET
      2022
      Logo de DET
      Logo de DET
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de DET
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de DET
      Logo de DET
      Logo de DET
      Logo de DET
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $75 482 500 $0 $1 700 000 $6 017 500 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AD, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Raymond, Lucas
      925 000 $925 000 $
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      AG, C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      950 000 $950 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      900 000 $900 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      950 000 $950 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      DD
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      RFA - 3
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DD
      RFA - 2
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      C, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
      1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      4 oct. 2020 à 10 h 7
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 1,173
      Mentions "j'aime": 697
      Canucks give you a hard no on this deal. We don't need Loui gone that badly. There are better options.
      4 oct. 2020 à 10 h 11
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 1,021
      Mentions "j'aime": 641
      Quoting: Jim_Benning_Almost
      Canucks give you a hard no on this deal. We don't need Loui gone that badly. There are better options.


      Interesting. I view that as very similar value to the Staal trade. While Vancouver is giving up a 1st they are receiving a 2nd, and the difference between a late 1st and a mid to late 2nd is exactly huge. The conditional pick is purely because Detroit need Eriksson to at least be a warm body. Could probably drop to a 4th if he plays more than 70 games.
      aedoran a aimé ceci.
      4 oct. 2020 à 10 h 21
      #3
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 33,053
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
      Quoting: Jim_Benning_Almost
      Canucks give you a hard no on this deal. We don't need Loui gone that badly. There are better options.


      You do if OEL comes into the picture, There's noway the Canucks are adding OEL plus resigning both Markstrom and Toffoli as long as Eriksson is still on the team that's not even remotely realistic. Even if you can move Baertschi, Virtanen, Sutter, Stetcher and others it wont clear enough cap to afford close to $19.25M between adding OEL and resigning both Markstrom and Toffoli.
      aedoran a aimé ceci.
      4 oct. 2020 à 10 h 22
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 1,173
      Mentions "j'aime": 697
      Quoting: Seider53
      Interesting. I view that as very similar value to the Staal trade. While Vancouver is giving up a 1st they are receiving a 2nd, and the difference between a late 1st and a mid to late 2nd is exactly huge. The conditional pick is purely because Detroit need Eriksson to at least be a warm body. Could probably drop to a 4th if he plays more than 70 games.


      I get the point, but in reality our window to take a serious Cup run isn't for another couple of years and Loui will be gone by then. He has only $5M of actual cash to be paid to him in the next two years, and carries a cap hit of $12M for those two years. In these days of no fans, there will be cash strapped teams (ie. Florida, AZ, etc) looking to dump actual salary for Loui's differential. It would be nice to unload his contract, but not at that price.
      4 oct. 2020 à 10 h 23
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2018
      Messages: 2,277
      Mentions "j'aime": 507
      Coming in to say the Pens trade is perfectly fine before Pens people get jammed for no reason.
      4 oct. 2020 à 10 h 31
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 1,021
      Mentions "j'aime": 641
      Quoting: Jim_Benning_Almost
      I get the point, but in reality our window to take a serious Cup run isn't for another couple of years and Loui will be gone by then. He has only $5M of actual cash to be paid to him in the next two years, and carries a cap hit of $12M for those two years. In these days of no fans, there will be cash strapped teams (ie. Florida, AZ, etc) looking to dump actual salary for Loui's differential. It would be nice to unload his contract, but not at that price.


      And how are Pettersson, Hughes and Demko getting re-signed?
      If Vancouver signs each player for 8.5 million, which would be a bargin, and has a goalie tandem getting paid 7 million (Which if it is Demko/Markstrom is a bargain) They have 66 million comitted to 13 guys. They would need to sign: 2 top 4 Dmen, 2 bottom pair Dmen, 2 top 6 wingers and 3 bottom 6 forwards. You'll also want at least 1 spare forward and 1 spare D. Even if your key players take cheap deals you are in an absolute bind that offseason dude.
      Given that the Canucks are one of the teams that has cut the pay of their staff I wouldnt be assuming that they are able to spend up to the cap either.
      aedoran a aimé ceci.
      4 oct. 2020 à 10 h 33
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2017
      Messages: 21,485
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,899
      With the Fleury trade I understand what you are doing and I do like it but I don't know if Vegas and Carolina will agree. I'm against Turris to Detroit that's 4yrs at $6M a season and the cap most likely won't raise more than $1M a season for 3 to 4 years. Detroit has a lot of cap space now but 2 or 3 years from now I'm not so sure. Will Nashville give up a 1st to move him because drafting Askarov depends on it. Even in Detroit Kerfoot is a bottom 6 player and dropping back almost 2 full rounds to obtain Kerfoot I think it's too much. I do like JPO and a 3rd for taking JJ and losing Timashov to Seattle in the expansion draft is good unless a 3rd is all it will take to send Abdelkader to Seattle.
      4 oct. 2020 à 10 h 41
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 1,021
      Mentions "j'aime": 641
      Quoting: aedoran
      With the Fleury trade I understand what you are doing and I do like it but I don't know if Vegas and Carolina will agree. I'm against Turris to Detroit that's 4yrs at $6M a season and the cap most likely won't raise more than $1M a season for 3 to 4 years. Detroit has a lot of cap space now but 2 or 3 years from now I'm not so sure. Will Nashville give up a 1st to move him because drafting Askarov depends on it. Even in Detroit Kerfoot is a bottom 6 player and dropping back almost 2 full rounds to obtain Kerfoot I think it's too much. I do like JPO and a 3rd for taking JJ and losing Timashov to Seattle in the expansion draft is good unless a 3rd is all it will take to send Abdelkader to Seattle.


      I agree with what you are saying, there are some moves I would prefer Detroit make to bring in a bigger haul or take a lower risk.
      These are deals that I would see as being achievable.
      I wouldn't be too worried about Turris' contract length honestly, so long as Yzerman negotiates well his would be the only bad contract on the books after 21/22, and if he can find a bit of form as a 2/3C and get 40-50 points per year I wouldn't be too concerned. I would prefer to target Stepan from Az, but they don't really have any picks to sweeten the deal in exchange for taking him.
      aedoran a aimé ceci.
      4 oct. 2020 à 11 h 15
      #9
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2018
      Messages: 19,215
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
      Quoting: dgfresh78
      Coming in to say the Pens trade is perfectly fine before Pens people get jammed for no reason.


      penguins would reject this. They will buy him out before.
      1 million in cap space isn't worth all that.
      4 oct. 2020 à 11 h 18
      #10
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 1,021
      Mentions "j'aime": 641
      Quoting: pharrow
      penguins would reject this. They will buy him out before.
      1 million in cap space isn't worth all that.


      Will they have the cap space? their next couple years are looking pretty tight even if they can spend to the 81.5 limit.
      aedoran a aimé ceci.
      4 oct. 2020 à 11 h 47
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2018
      Messages: 2,277
      Mentions "j'aime": 507
      Quoting: pharrow
      penguins would reject this. They will buy him out before.
      1 million in cap space isn't worth all that.


      Been hearing you say this for at least 18 months now and it’s been known that the organization doesn’t believe in buyouts so what makes you keep pushing that idea?
      4 oct. 2020 à 12 h 4
      #12
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2018
      Messages: 19,215
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
      Quoting: dgfresh78
      Been hearing you say this for at least 18 months now and it’s been known that the organization doesn’t believe in buyouts so what makes you keep pushing that idea?


      I had said in the past they will try to trade him. And they did, did they not?
      Blame Kessel on that one.
      It is what it is. But I don't see them giving all this up of 900k in cap space on a buy out.
      I think the truth is if JJ could have just held his **** together for a few games in the playoffs things would be different on the trade front. It's not like he didn't have stretches of decent play. But Sully is an idiot. Played him in 1LD and **** just spiraled down from there. Coming back after a long break did not serve him well either.
      As it is now, they won't carry this many defense, and we know who the odd man out is. Be it trade or buyout. But it won't cost this much to trade. If so, they buy him out.
      It's not like they will care in a few years. I don't think anyone sees this team going past 2 more years. Malkin will be going on 37, Crosby 36. They won't be caring about the small cap carry.
      But if they can get something greater out of those assets at TDL, to win a cup they will do that.
      And that is worth more than 900k to them.
      4 oct. 2020 à 12 h 13
      #13
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2018
      Messages: 19,215
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
      Quoting: Seider53
      Will they have the cap space? their next couple years are looking pretty tight even if they can spend to the 81.5 limit.


      to buy him out. Sure. no problem. it's only 900k this year. They will worry about next year next year.
      4 oct. 2020 à 12 h 15
      #14
      Will9739
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 893
      Mentions "j'aime": 308
      Quoting: Jim_Benning_Almost
      I get the point, but in reality our window to take a serious Cup run isn't for another couple of years and Loui will be gone by then. He has only $5M of actual cash to be paid to him in the next two years, and carries a cap hit of $12M for those two years. In these days of no fans, there will be cash strapped teams (ie. Florida, AZ, etc) looking to dump actual salary for Loui's differential. It would be nice to unload his contract, but not at that price.

      You bring up no fans and “real cash.” It’s a very good point. I haven’t seen anyone else bring it up. I’d like to add to your point of “no fans”: perhaps college football allowing limited capacity crowds will be a good test for other sports. We shall see.
      aedoran a aimé ceci.
      4 oct. 2020 à 12 h 57
      #15
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2017
      Messages: 21,485
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,899
      Quoting: Seider53
      I agree with what you are saying, there are some moves I would prefer Detroit make to bring in a bigger haul or take a lower risk.
      These are deals that I would see as being achievable.
      I wouldn't be too worried about Turris' contract length honestly, so long as Yzerman negotiates well his would be the only bad contract on the books after 21/22, and if he can find a bit of form as a 2/3C and get 40-50 points per year I wouldn't be too concerned. I would prefer to target Stepan from Az, but they don't really have any picks to sweeten the deal in exchange for taking him.


      I agree with that. Before coming back to Detroit he never really had to deal with cap dumps so there is nothing to go back and look at to get a feel for what his trying to do.
      4 oct. 2020 à 13 h 15
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 1,173
      Mentions "j'aime": 697
      Quoting: will9739
      You bring up no fans and “real cash.” It’s a very good point. I haven’t seen anyone else bring it up. I’d like to add to your point of “no fans”: perhaps college football allowing limited capacity crowds will be a good test for other sports. We shall see.


      I sure hope it works out in college football. They have the added advantage of playing outdoors, however I'd favour 20 - 25% full stadiums for hockey....kind of like watching the Florida Panthers' home games!! grin
      will9739 a aimé ceci.
      4 oct. 2020 à 14 h 28
      #17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 1,576
      Mentions "j'aime": 732
      Quoting: Seider53
      And how are Pettersson, Hughes and Demko getting re-signed?
      If Vancouver signs each player for 8.5 million, which would be a bargin, and has a goalie tandem getting paid 7 million (Which if it is Demko/Markstrom is a bargain) They have 66 million comitted to 13 guys. They would need to sign: 2 top 4 Dmen, 2 bottom pair Dmen, 2 top 6 wingers and 3 bottom 6 forwards. You'll also want at least 1 spare forward and 1 spare D. Even if your key players take cheap deals you are in an absolute bind that offseason dude.
      Given that the Canucks are one of the teams that has cut the pay of their staff I wouldnt be assuming that they are able to spend up to the cap either.


      It’s already been verified VAN will spend to the cap, can’t remember which insider was talking about it, think it may have been Dhaliwal.

      No question VAN is not in an idea cap situation, but keep in mind in 2021-2022 VAN will have some combination of: Podkolzin, Hoglander, Lind, MacEwen, Rathbone, Rafferty and Juolevi all playing on the team on ECL’s or cheap contracts, that provides some level of flexibility.
      Don’t get me wrong I think the team will likely have to rid a bad contract or two, but this team is not going to be contenders for another 2-4 years. Not much of a point in paying super high costs to move out costly pieces right now when that price will drop with one less year on the contracts, unless of course you believe you can win now.
      Jim_Benning_Almost a aimé ceci.
      4 oct. 2020 à 14 h 46
      #18
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 1,021
      Mentions "j'aime": 641
      Quoting: Reason
      It’s already been verified VAN will spend to the cap, can’t remember which insider was talking about it, think it may have been Dhaliwal.

      No question VAN is not in an idea cap situation, but keep in mind in 2021-2022 VAN will have some combination of: Podkolzin, Hoglander, Lind, MacEwen, Rathbone, Rafferty and Juolevi all playing on the team on ECL’s or cheap contracts, that provides some level of flexibility.
      Don’t get me wrong I think the team will likely have to rid a bad contract or two, but this team is not going to be contenders for another 2-4 years. Not much of a point in paying super high costs to move out costly pieces right now when that price will drop with one less year on the contracts, unless of course you believe you can win now.


      Right, and where I am coming from is that the deal proposed above would be reasonable sufficient flexibility. It's nothing major for Vancouver to lose.
      5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 31
      #19
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2018
      Messages: 2,277
      Mentions "j'aime": 507
      Quoting: pharrow
      penguins would reject this. They will buy him out before.
      1 million in cap space isn't worth all that.


      Holy hell they actually bought him out.
      5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 32
      #20
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2018
      Messages: 19,215
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
      Quoting: dgfresh78
      Holy hell they actually bought him out.


      yeah ain't that something. 1 mil wasn't worth what they were giving up.
      Simple math.
      5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 36
      #21
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2018
      Messages: 2,277
      Mentions "j'aime": 507
      Quoting: pharrow
      yeah ain't that something. 1 mil wasn't worth what they were giving up.
      Simple math.


      I agree I just never thought they’d do it.
      5 oct. 2020 à 13 h 44
      #22
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2018
      Messages: 19,215
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
      Quoting: dgfresh78
      I agree I just never thought they’d do it.


      yeah I think they realize there is limited time left.
      This team is set to rebuild in 2 years. Malkin if he comes back it's at reduced salary. Same with Letang. They defense core is now Pettersson Marino, Maniscalco, and Dumo.
      The only real question is, where do they get a center in 2 years.
      5 oct. 2020 à 14 h 11
      #23
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2018
      Messages: 2,277
      Mentions "j'aime": 507
      Quoting: pharrow
      yeah I think they realize there is limited time left.
      This team is set to rebuild in 2 years. Malkin if he comes back it's at reduced salary. Same with Letang. They defense core is now Pettersson Marino, Maniscalco, and Dumo.
      The only real question is, where do they get a center in 2 years.


      I think we’re at the point where they just roll the dice in free agency in two years. They really have no resources to get anyone who is or who could develop into a top 6 center so they got just roll with it and see what happens.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage