SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

RED ALERT RED ALERT

Créé par: Shane_Kelly
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 3 oct. 2020
Publié: 3 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
LATER BAUD. Sweeney has asked for his 15 team no trade list. This. Is. It. Sweenius go to work. Swindell someone big time.
Transactions
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1881 500 000 $59 104 814 $964 222 $1 250 000 $22 395 186 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 22
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
Personally i think Sweeney has been a pretty bad GM. I don’t trust him with a decision of this magnitude.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 23
#2
Démarrer sujet
Shane Kelly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 854
Mentions "j'aime": 296
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Personally i think Sweeney has been a pretty bad GM. I don’t trust him with a decision of this magnitude.


really? I think it has sneaky been hard to be the Bruins gm, just because of who came before.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 25
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
Quoting: Shane_Kelly
really? I think it has sneaky been hard to be the Bruins gm, just because of who came before.


You mean the guy that built most of Sweeney’s success? Chiarelli was 100 times the GM Sweeney has been. Sweeney drafted McAvoy, Carlo fell in his lap, and he’s signed a couple good extensions.

Then you’ve got the really bad stuff he’s done. There’s a lot.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,770
Mentions "j'aime": 8,828
Standard procedure to ask players with NTC’s for their list in the offseason even if there is nothing in the works.


Avs are really the only team that makes sense.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,980
Mentions "j'aime": 11,981
Boston fans have taken Tuukka for granted for years. I can't wait til they find out that the next guy isn't going to be as good Tuukka.
Habhater a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 32
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
I think you'll be disappointed with his return package
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 38
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Boston fans have taken Tuukka for granted for years. I can't wait til they find out that the next guy isn't going to be as good Tuukka.


Boston fans are the worst (I say that as one, possibly dumbest group of fans outside of Washington).
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 40
#8
Démarrer sujet
Shane Kelly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 854
Mentions "j'aime": 296
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Boston fans have taken Tuukka for granted for years. I can't wait til they find out that the next guy isn't going to be as good Tuukka.


I don't want him gone, and I have been a huge tuukka supporter, but If he's getting traded, they better get something good.
Habhater a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 41
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,573
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Boston fans have taken Tuukka for granted for years. I can't wait til they find out that the next guy isn't going to be as good Tuukka.


More the anti-Rask. I know lots of people that like him, know how good he is and how hard it is to find a goalie of this caliber; at the same time they're the ones that understand hockey so I'm not surprised of the rest. If I wasn't planning to be a Bruins fan after Rask is gone, would sure wish them (anti-Rask crowd) to get the worst G ever in NHL history so maybe they realize how good he was.
Shane_Kelly a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 41
#10
Démarrer sujet
Shane Kelly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 854
Mentions "j'aime": 296
Quoting: Gofnut999
Standard procedure to ask players with NTC’s for their list in the offseason even if there is nothing in the works.


Avs are really the only team that makes sense.


but I think this is different. Because his name is out there, and some teams may be looking his way.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 42
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,770
Mentions "j'aime": 8,828
Quoting: Shane_Kelly
but I think this is different. Because his name is out there, and some teams may be looking his way.


We’ll see. I figured they’d try this offseason.
Shane_Kelly a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 50
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,724
Mentions "j'aime": 535
I don't see him being traded. Might as well look what his value is with an expiring deal. His future is too uncertain. Out of nowhere he could say he wants to retire, so I think this is just standard protocol for a valuable veteran with 1yr remaining.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 58
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,770
Mentions "j'aime": 8,828
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Boston fans have taken Tuukka for granted for years. I can't wait til they find out that the next guy isn't going to be as good Tuukka.


True story. However after opting out, retirement likely coming, 1 year left, 7m cap hit....attempting to moving him seemed inevitable.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 58
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,770
Mentions "j'aime": 8,828
Quoting: TheOtherAuston
I think you'll be disappointed with his return package


Then they won’t move him. 🤷🏻‍♂️
TheOtherAuston a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 17 h 2
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Quoting: Gofnut999
Then they won’t move him. 🤷🏻‍♂️


I agree, I don't think he gets moved.
3 oct. 2020 à 17 h 6
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,770
Mentions "j'aime": 8,828
Quoting: TheOtherAuston
I agree, I don't think he gets moved.


Depends on the offer. They won’t move him just for the sake of moving him. They get an offer they like....

It’s doubtful. I only see 1 or 2 teams that really work.
3 oct. 2020 à 17 h 9
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Quoting: Gofnut999
Depends on the offer. They won’t move him just for the sake of moving him. They get an offer they like....

It’s doubtful. I only see 1 or 2 teams that really work.


I agree but the teams inquiring are definitely going to have apprehensions about him, injury history and his family matters will play a part regardless of if it's fair or not. I think it's best he play out his last year and remain in Boston and retire.
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 17 h 57
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Boston fans have taken Tuukka for granted for years. I can't wait til they find out that the next guy isn't going to be as good Tuukka.


As a Bruins fan, he gets WAY more hate than he deserves, I just dont get it. Hes tied for the BEST SAVE PERCENTAGE OF ALL TIME (I get the game has changed but still a crazy feat) and has the 9th best playoff SV% of all time. Hes got crazy ability to take over games. I really hope they dont trade him
Shane_Kelly a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 18 h 26
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Bcarlo25
You mean the guy that built most of Sweeney’s success? Chiarelli was 100 times the GM Sweeney has been. Sweeney drafted McAvoy, Carlo fell in his lap, and he’s signed a couple good extensions.

Then you’ve got the really bad stuff he’s done. There’s a lot.


Really you think so?

Marchand - drafted pre PC
Bergeron - drafted pre PC
Pasta - (like Carlo with DS) fell into his lap
Krejci - drafted pre PC

So for the remaining guys from this year roster that where either here when PC was or drafted by PC....

Bjork
Chara
Krug
Grz
Rask

I know Sweeney get a lot of flak for the 2015 draft, but under PC our drafting was pretty bad. There were 48 players drafted by the Bruins during PC's tenure

38% - never played in an NHL game
75% - failed to to play more than 100 NHL games

The top 5 producing picks from the PC era:

Seguin - Who he later traded
Pastrnak - fell into his lap
Hamilton - Traded by Sweeney after Hamilton refused to sign with Boston
Spooner - no longer in the NHL
Joe Colborne - no longer in the NHL

The next 5 guys after that....

Heinen - traded by DS
Benning - never played in Boston
Donato - traded by DS
Grzelcyk - currently w/ team
Bjork - currently with team

While he did help bring a cup to Boston, he killed Boston with bad contracts after that and gave out NMC/NTC's like their were no big deal.
Shane_Kelly a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 18 h 35
#20
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
Quoting: ON3M4N
Really you think so?

Marchand - drafted pre PC
Bergeron - drafted pre PC
Pasta - (like Carlo with DS) fell into his lap
Krejci - drafted pre PC

So for the remaining guys from this year roster that where either here when PC was or drafted by PC....

Bjork
Chara
Krug
Grz
Rask

I know Sweeney get a lot of flak for the 2015 draft, but under PC our drafting was pretty bad. There were 48 players drafted by the Bruins during PC's tenure

38% - never played in an NHL game
75% - failed to to play more than 100 NHL games

The top 5 producing picks from the PC era:

Seguin - Who he later traded
Pastrnak - fell into his lap
Hamilton - Traded by Sweeney after Hamilton refused to sign with Boston
Spooner - no longer in the NHL
Joe Colborne - no longer in the NHL

The next 5 guys after that....

Heinen - traded by DS
Benning - never played in Boston
Donato - traded by DS
Grzelcyk - currently w/ team
Bjork - currently with team

While he did help bring a cup to Boston, he killed Boston with bad contracts after that and gave out NMC/NTC's like their were no big deal.


Didn’t realize it was only a discussion about drafting. However, i will point out, if you think that Chiarelli wasn’t in charge of the marchand draft, you’re the biggest sucker on the planet.

Wanna talk about bad contracts? Beleskey and Backes still on the damn payroll this season.

The drafting was better under Chiarelli.

Sweeney can take credit for Carlo, McAvoy, Cassidy, and a great extension for Marchand and Pasta.

He’s been horrible aside from that.
3 oct. 2020 à 18 h 51
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Didn’t realize it was only a discussion about drafting. However, i will point out, if you think that Chiarelli wasn’t in charge of the marchand draft, you’re the biggest sucker on the planet.

Wanna talk about bad contracts? Beleskey and Backes still on the damn payroll this season.

The drafting was better under Chiarelli.

Sweeney can take credit for Carlo, McAvoy, Cassidy, and a great extension for Marchand and Pasta.

He’s been horrible aside from that.


He wasn't allowed to participate in the draft by the NHL. Did he secretly have some involvement? Maybe, maybe not. There's no proof he was in charge of the 2016 draft. Assuming he was is just foolish

Sweeney can't take credit for DeBrusk? Lauzon? Coyle (and his extension) Halak?
3 oct. 2020 à 19 h 7
#22
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
Quoting: ON3M4N
He wasn't allowed to participate in the draft by the NHL. Did he secretly have some involvement? Maybe, maybe not. There's no proof he was in charge of the 2016 draft. Assuming he was is just foolish

Sweeney can't take credit for DeBrusk? Lauzon? Coyle (and his extension) Halak?


There’s more than enough evidence to put the pieces together. Chara profusely thanking Chiarelli for bringing him to Boston is a big one. Another big clue is Gorton. You think he was on the job for a hot minute, drafted Kessel, Lucic, Marchand, traded for Tuukka, signed Chara, and Savard, and took a decade to get another job offer? It’s a horribly kept secret that Chiarelli was running the show.

You want credit for a backup goalie, a 2nd round damn that’s played a few games and looked good, and a solid 3rd line center that’s probably a bit overpaid now? Knock yourself out. Pretty low bar, don’t ya think?
3 oct. 2020 à 19 h 10
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Bcarlo25
There’s more than enough evidence to put the pieces together. Chara profusely thanking Chiarelli for bringing him to Boston is a big one. Another big clue is Gorton. You think he was on the job for a hot minute, drafted Kessel, Lucic, Marchand, traded for Tuukka, signed Chara, and Savard, and took a decade to get another job offer? It’s a horribly kept secret that Chiarelli was running the show.

You want credit for a backup goalie, a 2nd round damn that’s played a few games and looked good, and a solid 3rd line center that’s probably a bit overpaid now? Knock yourself out. Pretty low bar, don’t ya think?


Chara was pretty well known seeing as they both were in Ottawa lol. We can agree to disagree. It isn't the first time and won't be the last lol
3 oct. 2020 à 19 h 12
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,980
Mentions "j'aime": 11,981
Quoting: shmoeman
As a Bruins fan, he gets WAY more hate than he deserves, I just dont get it. Hes tied for the BEST SAVE PERCENTAGE OF ALL TIME (I get the game has changed but still a crazy feat) and has the 9th best playoff SV% of all time. Hes got crazy ability to take over games. I really hope they dont trade him


The anti Tuukka Bruins fans are in for a rude awakening because there's no surefire NHL option coming through the pipes, and there aren't any options available to Boston who are anywhere near Tuukka. I don't know how you trade Rask and improve your goaltending situation. I don't even know if you can trade him and break even on your goaltending situation.
shmoeman a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 19 h 13
#25
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,063
Mentions "j'aime": 6,967
Quoting: ON3M4N
Chara was pretty well known seeing as they both were in Ottawa lol. We can agree to disagree. It isn't the first time and won't be the last lol


Meh. I’m not a big agree to disagree guy. If you want to ignore evidence, be my guest.

It’s really freaking obvious.
EddieBower a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage