SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Maneuver

Créé par: Jay27
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 3 oct. 2020
Publié: 3 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
21 000 000 $
2800 000 $
23 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Perreault, Mathieu
  2. Roslovic, Jack [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Domi, Max [Droits de RFA]
  2. Kulak, Brett
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
2.
ANA
  1. Mete, Victor [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
3.
MTL
  1. Anderson, Josh [Droits de RFA]
4.
MTL
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (STL)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de STL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de WPG
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de OTT
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 507 781 $0 $3 157 500 $5 992 219 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
771 666 $771 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 oct. 2020 à 10 h 21
#1
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
The Winnipeg trade is close to the habs accepting, but that Anaheim trade is pure garbage.
3 oct. 2020 à 11 h 14
#2
Snipe City
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 376
Mentions "j'aime": 68
What kind of offer is that. Winnipeg is fleecing the Habs. A proven 70+ point scorer and a top 4 dman, along with 16th overall, for 2 bottom 6 wingers and 6 spots higher in the draft. The Habs are trying to get better not help other teams
3 oct. 2020 à 14 h 54
#3
MD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 60
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: YTSnipeCity
What kind of offer is that. Winnipeg is fleecing the Habs. A proven 70+ point scorer and a top 4 dman, along with 16th overall, for 2 bottom 6 wingers and 6 spots higher in the draft. The Habs are trying to get better not help other teams


Kulak a top 4 D ? on a pretty weak team maybe . 1 season of 70 pts isnt proven Domi has the potential to be a 70 pts guy but hes not proven . if that were the case jonathan cheechoo would be considered a proven 50 goal scorer ! i agree however that roslovic and the 10th oa arent worth Domi and the 16th oa add to that perrault contract and this isnt very interresting imo

Domi for Rackell i would consider
YTSnipeCity a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 25
#4
Démarrer sujet
Jay27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,898
Mentions "j'aime": 1,044
Quoting: JEFE
Kulak a top 4 D ? on a pretty weak team maybe . 1 season of 70 pts isnt proven Domi has the potential to be a 70 pts guy but hes not proven . if that were the case jonathan cheechoo would be considered a proven 50 goal scorer ! i agree however that roslovic and the 10th oa arent worth Domi and the 16th oa add to that perrault contract and this isnt very interresting imo

Domi for Rackell i would consider


Rakell is a responsible 2 way player and a 2 time 30 goal scorer on a cap friendly contract. Domi is a 1 time 70 point scorer who isn't a 200 foot player and needs a new contract. I'm a Habs fan and I do like Domi but I feel like a lot of people on here overvalue his worth in a trade.
JEFE a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 16 h 30
#5
Démarrer sujet
Jay27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,898
Mentions "j'aime": 1,044
Quoting: YTSnipeCity
What kind of offer is that. Winnipeg is fleecing the Habs. A proven 70+ point scorer and a top 4 dman, along with 16th overall, for 2 bottom 6 wingers and 6 spots higher in the draft. The Habs are trying to get better not help other teams


Kulak while he had a solid 2 series is not a top 4 dman.
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2020 à 17 h 39
#6
Snipe City
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 376
Mentions "j'aime": 68
Quoting: Jay27
Kulak while he had a solid 2 series is not a top 4 dman.


He played top 4 in mtl, he’d play top 4 in Winnipeg with Pk or Pp time no doubt. Maybe on a good defensive team he’s not, but in teams like us and you, he is
4 oct. 2020 à 9 h 3
#7
MD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 60
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: YTSnipeCity
He played top 4 in mtl, he’d play top 4 in Winnipeg with Pk or Pp time no doubt. Maybe on a good defensive team he’s not, but in teams like us and you, he is


he played top 4 mins in mtl ... a 23rd place team who got taken out in the first rd of the playoff , playoff they wouldnt have made if it wasnt for covid . kulak is in no way a top 4 D on anything but a lower third tier team
4 oct. 2020 à 9 h 14
#8
MD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 60
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Jay27
Rakell is a responsible 2 way player and a 2 time 30 goal scorer on a cap friendly contract. Domi is a 1 time 70 point scorer who isn't a 200 foot player and needs a new contract. I'm a Habs fan and I do like Domi but I feel like a lot of people on here overvalue his worth in a trade.


yeah the trade idea wasnt a full trade offer is was more of a base to build on . although Domi had one season above the others and is a rfa hes also had 251 pts to Rackells 283 in 2 seasons less Rackell is a career -2 while Domi is a +4 so defensive wise ... pretty similar .

i get that theres more to it than numbers but i dont think they re that far off even though i do agree Rackell might be better overall than Domi.
Max is a Center which adds to his value but i wouldnt have a problem adding a 2nd rd pcik to the trade to balance it out and even if it needed a 2nd and 4th id be ok
id consider putting in Fleury or Juulsen instead also if thats where they would go but i dont think theres much more needed.
thats of course if Anaheim is looking to move Rackell and If Domi is their cup of tea .
5 oct. 2020 à 1 h 53
#9
Snipe City
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 376
Mentions "j'aime": 68
Quoting: JEFE
he played top 4 mins in mtl ... a 23rd place team who got taken out in the first rd of the playoff , playoff they wouldnt have made if it wasnt for covid . kulak is in no way a top 4 D on anything but a lower third tier team


Buddy Winnipeg wasn’t making the playoffs when the season got cancelled and y’all STILL didn’t make it any further than freaking Toronto. Whatta joke u are. And u don’t have a sense of how good a player is, u just look at their chel ratings since Kulak is a top 6 78 ovr dman in the game
5 oct. 2020 à 20 h 35
#10
MD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 60
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: YTSnipeCity
Buddy Winnipeg wasn’t making the playoffs when the season got cancelled and y’all STILL didn’t make it any further than freaking Toronto. Whatta joke u are. And u don’t have a sense of how good a player is, u just look at their chel ratings since Kulak is a top 6 78 ovr dman in the game


Y'all ? you think im a Jets fan? now whos confused? If Habs felt Kulak was such a solid top4 D they wouldnt have acquired Edmundson so i guess im not the only one who doesnt see him as a top 4 ...

with Edmundson Charriot and possibily Romanov kulak might not even have a regular spot in the top 6 lol anyway keep being delusional i ve wasted enough time with ya

Dont know what Chel is im assuming some sorta video game guessing by the 78 overall rating you seem to value him at I dont play video Games . maybe you should stop playing video games and base your values of players on their overall .
6 oct. 2020 à 8 h 31
#11
Snipe City
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 376
Mentions "j'aime": 68
Quoting: JEFE
Y'all ? you think im a Jets fan? now whos confused? If Habs felt Kulak was such a solid top4 D they wouldnt have acquired Edmundson so i guess im not the only one who doesnt see him as a top 4 ...

with Edmundson Charriot and possibily Romanov kulak might not even have a regular spot in the top 6 lol anyway keep being delusional i ve wasted enough time with ya

Dont know what Chel is im assuming some sorta video game guessing by the 78 overall rating you seem to value him at I dont play video Games . maybe you should stop playing video games and base your values of players on their overall .


U obviously know what the NHL video games are lmao, stop pretending. And tell me why Kulak played top 4 mins for us in the playoffs and looked damn solid. Idc if he's not a top 4 on any other team, but in Winnipeg he would be, since their defence is bad and you know it.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage