SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Athletic rumor mill

Créé par: TanSor
Équipe: 2020-21 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 1 oct. 2020
Publié: 2 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
https://theathletic.com/2023306/2020/10/01/nhl-trade-free-agent-oliver-ekman-larsson-bruins-canucks/
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 550 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Rossi, Marco
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Chmelevski, Alexander
Détails additionnels:
No indication on a return, but I'm really hoping for Chmelevski.
SJS
  1. Donato, Ryan
  2. Dubnyk, Devan (2 166 666 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
"Hearing a Devan Dubnyk trade to San Jose may be in [Dubnyk's] court. [...] My guess is he’d waive, but there’s complicated family issues to figure out"-Michael Russo
2.
MIN
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Marco Rossi or Cole Perfetti

"Moving from [6th] isn’t off the table. When asked if the Ducks are tied to it, Ducks’ chief draft strategist Martin Madden said, “Not that much, to be honest.”

“And it depends who’s still there,” he added. “That top 12 is attractive from start to finish. If we think we can maximize it by moving up or moving down, we will. I don’t think we’re married to 6 at all, actually.” "-Eric Stephens (Sept. 30)
ANA
  1. Greenway, Jordan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
Not sure what else, shouldn't take too prohibitive of a package to move up 3 spots. Maybe Greenway gets it done?
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $69 632 757 $0 $925 000 $11 867 243 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 487 500 $1 487 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Rossi, Marco
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
I don't know why so many people have a hard on for moving up 3 spots in the draft, but it's not worth Greenway.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 9
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 698
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Modifié 2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 18
Quoting: Caerii
I don't know why so many people have a hard on for moving up 3 spots in the draft, but it's not worth Greenway.


Greenway isnt anything special. If Greenway level players was all it took to pick in the 6-8 range those picks would be traded every year.

Raymond/Rossi/Perfetti are a lot better than who the Wild would get at 9th.

Put it in a different draft would you move Kravtsov and Greenway for Quinn Hughes?

What about Mittelstadt and Greenway for Elias Pettersson?

To move into the better tier of the draft you have to give up something valuable. At 6 you get someone a lot more impactfull than Greenway and 9th
TanSor, Isles777 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Minnesota’s gonna have to add something very intriguing to the Sharks if we’re giving up Chmelevski. We have high hopes for him - in fact he’s probably our best forward prospect. So yeah.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 12
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: Caerii
I don't know why so many people have a hard on for moving up 3 spots in the draft, but it's not worth Greenway.


Depending on who is picked I think there's somewhat of a significant drop off from picks 1 to 2-3 to 4-8. We are sitting right outside of that 4-8 range and if we can move up to grab a potential 1C like Perfetti or Rossi then to me it's a no-brainer to move Greenway. Greenway definitely has upside but I just don't see him ever reaching it unless he magically starts playing mean.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 14
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Minnesota’s gonna have to add something very intriguing to the Sharks if we’re giving up Chmelevski. We have high hopes for him - in fact he’s probably our best forward prospect. So yeah.


John Leonard? But yeah he's probably top 5 in your prospect pool. I just figured the Sharks may want to keep their picks since they've traded so many away.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 16
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Lots of chatter that Askarov and Sanderson go top5. Wings at 4 and Sens at 5 are wild cards. Not sure you need to move up. There's a good chance Rossi or Holtz is available who'd I'd put in the same tier as Perfetti/Raymond.
TanSor a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Im praying the sharks dont give up a decent prospect in a Dubnyk deal. Shooting ourselves in the foot and losing a prospect would suck
TanSor et bunnymcfoo a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 17
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
Quoting: MadmanFromMadison
Greenway isnt anything special. If Greenway level players was all it took to pick in the 6-8 range those picks would be traded every year.

Raymond/Rossi/Perfetti are a lot better than who the Wild would get at 9th.

Put it in a different draft would you move Kravtsov and Greenway for Quinn Hughes?

What about Mittelstadt and Greenway for Elias Pettersson?

To move into the better tier of the draft you have to give up something valuable. You can take it to the bank that Rossi/Raymond/Perfetti end up better than Greenway and whos ever at 9



Would you move Nik Ehlers and Greenway for Jake Virtanen?

See how stupid that sounds?
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 20
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: TanSor
John Leonard? But yeah he's probably top 5 in your prospect pool. I just figured the Sharks may want to keep their picks since they've traded so many away.


Oof yeah that ones a stretch too we like him a lot as well. That’s the problem with a team like the Sharks: we have so few quality prospects that getting rid of anyone notable really hurts. Really not a good thing. Probably rather do a pick to be honest depending on which one it is. We’d rather keep our prospects and trade away a pick than keep that puck and pull another Roy>Aho situation.
TanSor et Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 21
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 698
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Quoting: Caerii
Would you move Nik Ehlers and Greenway for Jake Virtanen?

See how stupid that sounds?


As long as you dont make a dumb reach like Vancouver did it works out.
OlegP a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 21
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Mock draft from Pronman at theathletic.

4. Detroit Red Wings: Cole Perfetti, C, Saginaw-OHL
The only two names I’ve heard recently linked to Detroit by multiple sources are Perfetti and goaltender Yaroslav Askarov. One source made a good point regarding Perfetti, in that so many people seem to think that’s who Detroit is taking that it’s almost suspicious. Ultimately, I have to go with what all my information is telling me, even if my instinct says that Askarov, defenseman Jake Sanderson or forward Lucas Raymond could very well go at this spot.
5. Ottawa Senators: Jake Sanderson, D, USNTDP-USHL
Throughout the summer, I heard Lucas Raymond was the guy at No. 5 for Ottawa. The two players mentioned most recently by multiple sources for this pick are Sanderson and Askarov. The sense I’ve gotten from around the league is that Sanderson has the higher odds, but I could see any of those three at this slot.
TanSor, OldNYIfan et MNBassman a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 24
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 383
Mentions "j'aime": 115
The Ducks trade seems interesting but it happens only if Drysdale is taking at 5 by Ottawa, if not they keep it. At 6 Minnesota would have a interesting center in one of Rossi, Perfetti, Lundell. While Anaheim draft 9 Sanderson should still be available and it would likely be Anaheim choice.
TanSor, Stgstg55 et MNBassman a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 24
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: Caerii
Would you move Nik Ehlers and Greenway for Jake Virtanen?

See how stupid that sounds?


I don't think it's fair to cherry pick one draft like that. On average, the 9th overall pick has a lower probability of success compared to the 6th overall pick. That's what we're looking at here: a better lottery ticket (which is what all of these players are to be blunt) to target a better prospect that also happens to be a position of need.
OldNYIfan et MNBassman a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 28
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Quoting: MadmanFromMadison
As long as you dont make a dumb reach like Vancouver did it works out.


Quoting: Caerii
Would you move Nik Ehlers and Greenway for Jake Virtanen?

See how stupid that sounds?


It's pretty easy to find situations to fit your own narrative. Where it worked out as well... In 2016 Arizona moved up 4 spots to draft Chychrun at 16 instead of Cholowski at 20. Chychrun was a big drop. If you really like your guy, its worth it to go for it. All it cost was the dead money of Datsyuk and the 53rd pick.
TanSor et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 31
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Quoting: eddyed24
The Ducks trade seems interesting but it happens only if Drysdale is taking at 5 by Ottawa, if not they keep it. At 6 Minnesota would have a interesting center in one of Rossi, Perfetti, Lundell. While Anaheim draft 9 Sanderson should still be available and it would likely be Anaheim choice.


Don't think its likely at all that Sanderson available at 9. I'd go as far to say unlikely
MNBassman a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 32
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,963
Mentions "j'aime": 4,537
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Oof yeah that ones a stretch too we like him a lot as well. That’s the problem with a team like the Sharks: we have so few quality prospects that getting rid of anyone notable really hurts. Really not a good thing. Probably rather do a pick to be honest depending on which one it is. We’d rather keep our prospects and trade away a pick than keep that puck and pull another Roy>Aho situation.


I have zero issue issue giving up 3rds or 4ths since we are notoriously bad drafting in those rounds
FunMustBeAlways et TanSor a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 36
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
Quoting: TanSor
I don't think it's fair to cherry pick one draft like that. On average, the 9th overall pick has a lower probability of success compared to the 6th overall pick. That's what we're looking at here: a better lottery ticket (which is what all of these players are to be blunt) to target a better prospect that also happens to be a position of need.



Brett Connolly vs Mikael Granlund
Hampus Lindholm vs Jacob Trouba
Sean Monahan vs Bo Horvat
Jake Virtanen vs Nik Ehlers
Pavel Zacha vs Timo Meier
Matthew Tkachuk vs Mikhail Sergachev

Please show me where the separation is
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 43
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,963
Mentions "j'aime": 4,537
Quoting: Caerii
Brett Connolly vs Mikael Granlund
Hampus Lindholm vs Jacob Trouba
Sean Monahan vs Bo Horvat
Jake Virtanen vs Nik Ehlers
Pavel Zacha vs Timo Meier
Matthew Tkachuk vs Mikhail Sergachev

Please show me where the separation is


Well played!!!!

I get what he’s saying but you gave legit argument! I think I side with you on this one.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 52
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Modifié 2 oct. 2020 à 1 h 14
Quoting: Caerii
Brett Connolly vs Mikael Granlund
Hampus Lindholm vs Jacob Trouba
Sean Monahan vs Bo Horvat
Jake Virtanen vs Nik Ehlers
Pavel Zacha vs Timo Meier
Matthew Tkachuk vs Mikhail Sergachev

Please show me where the separation is


Here you go

While not a perfect metric, on average the 6th pick has 1.3 more game score value added (which weights a bunch of different stats including goals, assists, expected goals, shots, etc) than the 9th pick. You can read more about GSVA here but 1.3 GSVA is significant. And again, this is using historic data, much larger than the mere 6 years you chose (Dom used 20 years of data).

You can cherry pick all you want, but teams make decisions like this based on historic averages. In reality you may or may not achieve those averages. For example if we flip a coin twice, we'd expect heads once and tails once, so do we go around flipping chairs and freaking out when we get heads twice? No.

Edit: also this tweet to a degree. It includes all team's draft picks but is a nice visualization. Schucker's model is the one Dom was trying to improve on.



MNBassman a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 0 h 56
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,205
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
6-12 is the same quality player. No need to move up, none of them make a significant difference to MN's team longterm. Lundell (another JEE) is the only NHL center in that group, the rest are wings and d-men.

If Drysdale is there at 6 it would be something to consider. Brodin/Drysdale, Suter/Addison, Belpedio/Menell as a future d-corps has a lot of potential (I'll eat the Spurgeon buyout in 2 years if can't be moved).
MNBassman a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 1 h 0
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: wabit
6-12 is the same quality player. No need to move up, none of them make a significant difference to MN's team longterm. Lundell (another JEE) is the only NHL center in that group, the rest are wings and d-men.

If Drysdale is there at 6 it would be something to consider. Brodin/Drysdale, Suter/Addison, Belpedio/Menell as a future d-corps has a lot of potential (I'll eat the Spurgeon buyout in 2 years if can't be moved).


I disagree to a degree, I have a tier between picks 4-8 and 9-15ish. I'd love Drysdale but I think that's the one player where Anaheim wouldn't move their pick if he's available.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 1 h 14
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,205
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: TanSor
Here you go

While not a perfect metric, on average the 6th pick has 1.3 more game score value added (which weights a bunch of different stats including goals, assists, expected goals, shots, etc) than the 9th pick. You can read more about GSVA here but 1.3 GSVA is pretty significant. And again, this is using historic data, much larger than the mere 6 years you chose (Dom used 20 years of data).

You can cherry pick all you want, but teams make decisions like this based on historic averages. In reality you may or may not achieve those averages. For example if we flip a coin twice, we'd expect heads once and tails once, so do we go around flipping chairs and freaking out when we get heads twice? No.


Looking back to the 2001 draft there isn't much separation most years of 6 and 9. 9 has a couple more busts is all.
2 oct. 2020 à 1 h 17
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,205
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: TanSor
I disagree to a degree, I have a tier between picks 4-8 and 9-15ish. I'd love Drysdale but I think that's the one player where Anaheim wouldn't move their pick if he's available.


I have it top-2, 3-5, 6-11/12
TanSor a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 1 h 19
#24
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: wabit
Looking back to the 2001 draft there isn't much separation most years of 6 and 9. 9 has a couple more busts is all.


Like I said it's not a perfect model, but on average the 6th overall pick has a higher success rate than the 9th overall pick. And your comment about a few more busts only proves my point more. That's why I want to trade up if there's a player Brackett likes (I'm a Rossi guy, maybe he's not and I know you aren't). Remember, this is a guy who picked Boeser, Petterson, and Hughes.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2020 à 1 h 21
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: wabit
I have it top-2, 3-5, 6-11/12


Well that's the beauty of opinions, we all have our own cheers
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage