SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mutual Agreement with Montreal - Description

Créé par: Stgstg55
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 1 oct. 2020
Publié: 1 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 250 000 $
1886 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1889 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Drysdale, Jamie
3925 000 $
Zary, Connor
3925 000 $
Chromiak, Martin
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Brook, Josh
  2. Domi, Max [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
MTL
  1. Rakell, Rickard
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
2.
ANA
    Domi brings back a sense of scoring and physicality that the Ducks has always been known for. Pretty much a major upgraded Nick Ritchie.
    MTL
      I’ve talked with multiple Habs fans who’ve said they’d be willing to deal this package to get a first line winger to play with Gallagher and possible Suzuki ( if he plays 1C ) or Danault.
      3.
      ANA
      1. Cogliano, Andrew
      2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
      Rachats de contrats
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de DAL
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      2021
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      2022
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de ANA
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2181 500 000 $68 856 361 $0 $0 $12 643 639 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
      AG, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      820 000 $820 000 $
      AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      863 333 $863 333 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Stars de Dallas
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      C, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
      G
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      889 000 $889 000 $
      G
      UFA
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
      C, AD
      NMC
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      1 oct. 2020 à 14 h 37
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 497
      Mentions "j'aime": 149
      Well, here's a Habs fan saying that's too much for 2 years of service.
      "1st line winger" is like being a 1st line winger on the Habs-Not actually a 1st line player.

      I'd 1 for 1-max add a 2nd.
      1 oct. 2020 à 14 h 37
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 497
      Mentions "j'aime": 149
      Well, here's a Habs fan saying that's too much for 2 years of service.
      "1st line winger" is like being a 1st line winger on the Habs-Not actually a 1st line player.

      I'd 1 for 1-max add a 2nd.
      BigOaf69 a aimé ceci.
      1 oct. 2020 à 14 h 37
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 19,538
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,693
      I dont claim to speak for all Habs fans but that is a horrendous trade for Montreal. Rakell is a good player but shouldnt command Domi, a decent prospect and mid 1st rounder.

      If that is the cost, i rather not improve our RW position and go with what we got and keep the 1st and Domi and Brook.
      Lenny7 et BigOaf69 a aimé ceci.
      1 oct. 2020 à 14 h 42
      #4
      Lenny7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 13,291
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
      Quoting: F50marco
      I dont claim to speak for all Habs fans but that is a horrendous trade for Montreal. Rakell is a good player but shouldnt command Domi, a decent prospect and mid 1st rounder.

      If that is the cost, i rather not improve our RW position and go with what we got and keep the 1st and Domi and Brook.


      Ducks fan here-I agree. Rakell for Domi+something small (2021 2nd?) would be reasonable if Montreal was intent on moving Domi, but I really don't see why they would. I get the whole "hE wAnTs To Be A cEnTrE" thing, but man, he's so much better as a winger.
      1 oct. 2020 à 14 h 48
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 19,538
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,693
      Quoting: Lenny7
      Ducks fan here-I agree. Rakell for Domi+something small (2021 2nd?) would be reasonable if Montreal was intent on moving Domi, but I really don't see why they would. I get the whole "hE wAnTs To Be A cEnTrE" thing, but man, he's so much better as a winger.


      I used to think the center thing was a big issue but appaerently his agent has gone on record stating Domi will play any position needed. So im not worried about that issue as much anymore.
      Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
      1 oct. 2020 à 14 h 52
      #6
      Lenny7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 13,291
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
      Quoting: F50marco
      I used to think the center thing was a big issue but appaerently his agent has gone on record stating Domi will play any position needed. So im not worried about that issue as much anymore.


      Yeah, then keep him on the wing. He's solid, seems to like it in Montreal, and should be affordable.
      1 oct. 2020 à 14 h 55
      #7
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 2,871
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
      MTL aint gonna even consider that one. 1st rounder for Rakell maybe add Brook or Harris
      1 oct. 2020 à 14 h 56
      #8
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 2,871
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
      Quoting: F50marco
      I used to think the center thing was a big issue but appaerently his agent has gone on record stating Domi will play any position needed. So im not worried about that issue as much anymore.


      I think it's insane to trade a 25 year old player 1 year removed form 72 points and sandpaper in his game. The offers i see here are laughable. Domi can easily put up 60 points as a 2nd line center with some grit.
      1 oct. 2020 à 15 h 17
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 19,538
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,693
      Quoting: OlegP
      I think it's insane to trade a 25 year old player 1 year removed form 72 points and sandpaper in his game. The offers i see here are laughable. Domi can easily put up 60 points as a 2nd line center with some grit.


      I think it has less to do with Domi and more to do with Rakell. What has he done to warrant this return? Nothing IMO maybe at the start of his contract but now? Not a chance. If people are saying Domi is a 50 point player, well so is Rakell. So what are we doing this for? Also Rakell being a UFA as opposed to Domi RFA makes a difference enough to make up for Rackells low cap hit.

      Rakell for Domi straight up is closer than people think.
      1 oct. 2020 à 15 h 19
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2019
      Messages: 640
      Mentions "j'aime": 162
      Montreal is clearly overpaying here. There is no need to send Anaheim their 1st.
      1 oct. 2020 à 15 h 26
      #11
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 2,871
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
      Quoting: F50marco
      I think it has less to do with Domi and more to do with Rakell. What has he done to warrant this return? Nothing IMO maybe at the start of his contract but now? Not a chance. If people are saying Domi is a 50 point player, well so is Rakell. So what are we doing this for? Also Rakell being a UFA as opposed to Domi RFA makes a difference enough to make up for Rackells low cap hit.

      Rakell for Domi straight up is closer than people think.


      I didn't include Domi and I wouldn't.
      1 oct. 2020 à 16 h 13
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 19,538
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,693
      Quoting: OlegP
      I didn't include Domi and I wouldn't.


      Oh ya i agree. Just saying how im surprised how anyone could justify it in the first place.
      1 oct. 2020 à 16 h 15
      #13
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 2,871
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
      Quoting: F50marco
      Oh ya i agree. Just saying how im surprised how anyone could justify it in the first place.


      This place is funny. You can't please anyone unless you somehow make a trade that is homerun for both teams so most just throw things at the wall and see if it sticks
      1 oct. 2020 à 16 h 28
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 19,538
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,693
      Quoting: OlegP
      This place is funny. You can't please anyone unless you somehow make a trade that is homerun for both teams so most just throw things at the wall and see if it sticks


      I think people have it all wrong to be honest with you. It isnt about making the most even trade possible. That rarely happens even in the NHL.

      Instead try to think of new ideas that can spark a discussion. That should be the goal.
      OlegP a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage