SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Swaptions

Créé par: The_Rocket
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 29 sept. 2020
Publié: 29 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Buncha 1 for 1 trades
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
31 200 000 $
24 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 800 000 $
12 000 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Cernak, Erik4 000 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2021
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
WPG
  1. Gaudette, Adam [Droits de RFA]
4.
MTL
  1. Virtanen, Jake [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 075 767 $1 700 000 $5 400 000 $1 424 233 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 280 000 $2 280 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 sept. 2020 à 18 h 50
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Detroit says done deal, No take backs.
AZWings a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 18 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 484
Mentions "j'aime": 372
These are all pretty bad for Vancouver. The Sutter one maybe if Markstrom doesn't re-sign but I'd rather have Eriksson over Abdelkater, Gaudette over Copp and Virtanen over Armia.
29 sept. 2020 à 18 h 52
#3
Steve
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,116
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Hmmm, not sure about the Det one. Higher cap hit but a year less term.... I don’t hate it, I just don’t see much incentive. If losing 2 mil in cap is that important than how about adding a late pick kicker
aedoran a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 18 h 55
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 661
Mentions "j'aime": 321
Koskinen is actually not a bad goaltender and we kinda need him to play goal. Easy pass
29 sept. 2020 à 18 h 59
#5
BergDaMan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 800
Mentions "j'aime": 232
Habs want no part of that deal
Kotkaniemi15 a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 3
#6
Juraj Slapshotsky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,127
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Interesting trade that MTL one. In my opinion it would be no but that's just me. I just really love Armia.... But the value is here for both side. Really interesting
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 7
#7
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,183
Mentions "j'aime": 3,224
Habs need more RWers not to trade one out of town for another. I have always liked the idea of adding Virtanen though
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 19
#8
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Hell no. Virtanen’s a crap player & human being, and we aren’t moving Armia unless we get fair value.
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 31
#9
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,916
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: Stevierebz
Hmmm, not sure about the Det one. Higher cap hit but a year less term.... I don’t hate it, I just don’t see much incentive. If losing 2 mil in cap is that important than how about adding a late pick kicker


Canucks save over 4 mill this coming season buying out Abdelkader compared to keeping loui. Then they save about 3.8 million the next. The catch is the buy out lasts 6 years with at least 1 million in cap each year
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 34
#10
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,916
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: WallStreet83
These are all pretty bad for Vancouver. The Sutter one maybe if Markstrom doesn't re-sign but I'd rather have Eriksson over Abdelkater, Gaudette over Copp and Virtanen over Armia.


Coop definitely is a lower offensive ceiling than Gaudette, also a few years older.

But he’s really good 5 on 5 and on the pk. Much better defensively than Gaudette as well. Canucks need a bottom 6 that’s better in their own end. This accomplished that.

Eriksson for abdelkader is in order to buy out abdelkader.

Virtanen for armia is whatever. Only really included it because Jake is on the block so I’m just replacing him with a stop gap until Podkolzin comes over. If it’s no fair then just ignore it and pretend I signed Jake to fill that role
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 35
#11
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,916
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: Tarlam01
Interesting trade that MTL one. In my opinion it would be no but that's just me. I just really love Armia.... But the value is here for both side. Really interesting


Yeah it’s only in there because Virtanen is on the trade block. Imo I’d be fine with Van just re-signing him to a deal with a simile cap hit to Armia’s.
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 37
#12
Oilers GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,584
Mentions "j'aime": 566
Here's the thing

Koskinen was a top 15 goalie this season
Sutter sucked this season
SadlyAnOilFan a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 39
#13
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,916
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: SadlyAnOilFan
Koskinen is actually not a bad goaltender and we kinda need him to play goal. Easy pass


This trade frees up a lot of space to go after UFA goalies for Edmonton (holtby, Markstrom, Lehner, etc.) Oil are also rumoured to be interested in Raanta. Re-allocating cap to a team need (3C) is a helpful move, plus Sutters contract has one year less on it.

That being said, if Canucks has to add a sweetener I would do it
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 41
#14
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,916
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: ken_holland
Here's the thing

Koskinen was a top 15 goalie this season
Sutter sucked this season


Yeah and then he was like, really bad in the playoffs. And for some reason Tippet went with Smith over him to start? And the oilers are rumoured to be looking to add a starting goalie?

I don’t think the oilers think of highly of Koskinen as you do. He’s a good back up. Not much more
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 48
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,485
Mentions "j'aime": 11,899
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Detroit says done deal, No take backs.


Quoting: Stevierebz
Hmmm, not sure about the Det one. Higher cap hit but a year less term.... I don’t hate it, I just don’t see much incentive. If losing 2 mil in cap is that important than how about adding a late pick kicker


Of course Detroit takes this deal. The overall cap hit is about the same but being done in 2yrs instead of 3yrs and Eriksson had 4x the points that Abdelkader had this season.
Spaceman et Stevierebz a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 49
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 840
Mentions "j'aime": 199
Habs say yes
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 50
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,785
Mentions "j'aime": 847
Quoting: aedoran
Of course Detroit takes this deal. The overall cap hit is about the same but being done in 2yrs instead of 3yrs and Eriksson had 4x the points that Abdelkader had this season.


Detroit would do that. They can afford the extra cap hit and it's done 1 year sooner. Eriksson also is capable of scoring goals without Pavel Datsyuk as his center. Can't say the same for Abby.
aedoran et MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 20 h 0
#18
Ouch
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 540
Quoting: The_Rocket
Yeah and then he was like, really bad in the playoffs. And for some reason Tippet went with Smith over him to start? And the oilers are rumoured to be looking to add a starting goalie?

I don’t think the oilers think of highly of Koskinen as you do. He’s a good back up. Not much more


So what? They trade the only goalie they have..
29 sept. 2020 à 20 h 24
#19
Oilers GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,584
Mentions "j'aime": 566
Quoting: The_Rocket
Yeah and then he was like, really bad in the playoffs. And for some reason Tippet went with Smith over him to start? And the oilers are rumoured to be looking to add a starting goalie?

I don’t think the oilers think of highly of Koskinen as you do. He’s a good back up. Not much more


It was a 4 game sample size...
If anyone isn't returning next year, it's Smith.

According to goaltending analytics, he was the 9th best goalie in the league in the regular season. Put up a .917 SV% (what was Markstrom SV% again?) behind a team that finished 26th in the league for EV goals against/game

Saying Koskinen is just a backup is a really bad take
SadlyAnOilFan a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 20 h 27
#20
Oilers GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,584
Mentions "j'aime": 566
Quoting: The_Rocket
This trade frees up a lot of space to go after UFA goalies for Edmonton (holtby, Markstrom, Lehner, etc.) Oil are also rumoured to be interested in Raanta. Re-allocating cap to a team need (3C) is a helpful move, plus Sutters contract has one year less on it.

That being said, if Canucks has to add a sweetener I would do it


Holtby instead of Koskinen makes our team worse. Holtby could barely put up a .900 SV% behind the defensive minded Capitals.
SadlyAnOilFan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage