SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

REVISED Cup Returns and Z rides off into the sunset

Créé par: datdude
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 29 sept. 2020
Publié: 29 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Bruins - Calgary gets Krejci a top RW in Lindholm, while giving calgary nice pieces to build upon essentially 2 top 9 players, 2 1st rounders for an affordable 30 goal scorer.

Bruins/ NYI- Is the deal that I am most likely to see happen is the Bruins move two players who both should have nice careers, and picks to get Bailey from NYI. NYI does this to get a decent return for a player that they might have to move due to cap restraints while taking two entry level deals on guys who can play in the NHL, along with two picks.

Boston - NSH, is a Win-Win for all. I think Boston gets that anchor on the left side who has been hidden behind Josi, and could be in Boston for a long time. NSH gets a young exciting left winger, with Jam, and Offensive upside to help a depleted forward group.

Bos - Det - Cap clearing move, and allows lindholm to play full time in the league.

Bos- OTT - Senyshyn goes home, as there is now a log jam of RW in front of him, as Pasta, Lindholm, Stud, Kuhlman. Boston gets pick in Deep Draft
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 900 000 $
23 300 000 $
2900 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
NSH
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
3.
CGY
  1. Beecher, John [Liste de réserve]
  2. Bjork, Anders
  3. Kase, Ondrej
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
4.
BOS
  1. Bailey, Josh
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Forsbacka Karlsson, Jakob [Liste de réserve]
  2. Vaakanainen, Urho
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
5.
BOS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (DET)
6.
BOS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYI
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de ARI
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 098 981 $964 222 $1 657 500 $3 401 019 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 20
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 7,116
I think there could be a deal there with Ekholm for DeBrusk+ but there needs to be more added than just a 3rd. If Ekholm becomes available, NSH will have a lot of teams calling...
datdude a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 21
#2
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Detroit has no need for more depth guys. Pass.
datdude a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
You're giving too much to NYI for Bailey. If you protect McAvoy, Ekholm and Carlo, you probably lose Grzelcyk to Seattle and now you have traded Vaakanainen.
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 25
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,678
Mentions "j'aime": 12,025
Detroit passes. Why throw away a pick for a player who is a UFA at the end of the season.
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 28
#5
MMBzFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,111
Mentions "j'aime": 281
Bailey isn’t the impact wing I would want for Krejci. Don’t think that’s a package Calgary would give up Lindholm for. Nashville trading Ekholm for DeBrusk who needs to show consistency...don’t see it.
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 40
#6
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 977
I actually don't mind this *that* much. The Calgary trade is kinda pointless, cause even if you get a tad more top end offense you lose depths and more importantly A LOT of value and assets in that trade
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 40
#7
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 977
I actually don't mind this *that* much. The Calgary trade is kinda pointless, cause even if you get a tad more top end offense you lose depths and more importantly A LOT of value and assets in that trade
29 sept. 2020 à 14 h 45
#8
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,931
Mentions "j'aime": 5,360
Wings still pass
29 sept. 2020 à 19 h 12
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 162
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: MelonVK
I actually don't mind this *that* much. The Calgary trade is kinda pointless, cause even if you get a tad more top end offense you lose depths and more importantly A LOT of value and assets in that trade


I think there is depth there, Kuhlman can play up and down the lineup, which is something that gives them the liberty to move these depth guys and young pieces to go get an affordable young goal scorer.
29 sept. 2020 à 20 h 30
#10
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 977
Quoting: datdude
I think there is depth there, Kuhlman can play up and down the lineup, which is something that gives them the liberty to move these depth guys and young pieces to go get an affordable young goal scorer.


Kase is as much of a play-driver and is more value/cap hit than Lindholm. Bjork is on a great contract - he's young, a good shooter/scorer, with plenty of room to develop. Beecher and the 1st is pretty much the up and coming offensive depth there is. I just never do this trade if I'm Boston, unless I'm blinded by Lindholm's counting stats.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage