SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

big shake up

Créé par: Ryancnbb
Équipe: 2020-21 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 28 sept. 2020
Publié: 28 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
45 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
NSH
  1. Domi, Max [Droits de RFA]
MTL
  1. Bonino, Nick
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
3.
SJS
  1. Carrier, Alexandre
  2. Johansen, Ryan
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2021
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2022
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $76 785 309 $0 $4 282 500 $4 714 691 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Predators de Nashville
9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
714 166 $714 166 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 sept. 2020 à 21 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,113
Mentions "j'aime": 3,471
Why the hell would Minnesota do that?
28 sept. 2020 à 21 h 48
#2
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,162
Mentions "j'aime": 20,483
Quoting: sens65
Why the hell would Minnesota do that?


Get a center
sens65 a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2020 à 21 h 54
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,239
Mentions "j'aime": 7,109
Quoting: sens65
Why the hell would Minnesota do that?


Turris is 2 years younger and has a better contract structure (they save $1m and don't need to pay any bonuses) + he doesn't have a NMC that requires protection in the expansion draft -- Zucc and Turris had comparable production this season but Turris was stuck on the 4th line as opposed to Zucc -- MIN needs centers much more than wingers -- the contracts have the same cap hit and term.

There are many reasons why MIN would be interested. I don't want the deal as a NSH fan, but the deal is constantly mentioned on this site for the reasons stated above.
sens65 et Ryancnbb a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2020 à 21 h 55
#4
Patient gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,864
Mentions "j'aime": 992
Quoting: sens65
Why the hell would Minnesota do that?


Family feuds top answer is “lots of drugs”
sens65 a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2020 à 21 h 56
#5
Patient gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,864
Mentions "j'aime": 992
So the turris zuccarello sea would super bad for mn. Turris just isn’t nearly as good a center as an under producing zuccarello.
28 sept. 2020 à 21 h 59
#6
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,279
Mentions "j'aime": 3,297
Not even close for Domi
28 sept. 2020 à 22 h 0
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Sharks have no interest. If we trade Couture we need someone younger but almost as productive coming back
28 sept. 2020 à 22 h 10
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,206
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: sens65
Why the hell would Minnesota do that?


Zucc didn't fit at all last year in MN. He's a better player than Turris, but older with a NMC (eats a protection slot in the expansion draft). I want nothing to to with Turrin in MN, but I want less to do with Zucc.

The trade could end up working for both teams, or neither of them. It's just a garbage in, garbage out for both teams.
sens65 a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2020 à 23 h 0
#9
Habs_fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 670
Mentions "j'aime": 158
Habs don't trade Domi for another centre. Makes no sense
28 sept. 2020 à 23 h 29
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,212
Mentions "j'aime": 2,863
I just don’t know how this helps us. The only scenario where we trade Couture is one where we shed a fair bit of cap or get a better player back. Neither of those needs are even remotely addressed here.
29 sept. 2020 à 6 h 24
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,288
Mentions "j'aime": 1,831
Not sure why the Sharks would trade Couture.

With Koivu not returning, MIN's top centers are M. Johansson, V. Rask, N. Bjugstad, and Joel Eriksson Ek. All of which have been stuck around 30 points or so for 3 or so seasons. Turris would be a reasonable gamble. Turris managed 31 points mainly playing with 4th line quality wingers. i think given a proper chance he'd get back to the 50 points of the 17-18 season. MIN needs centers and NSH needs wingers. This is why Zuc for Turris makes some sense. Bad thing is Zucs trade protection.... i really don't want anything to do with that.

Domi will cost more then that... but also why trade Bonino and Turris and then put Domi as 3C. Domi (like Turris) needs to be 2C or even 1C in a pinch to really flourish. Bonino is an ideal 3C and once Turris is gone it doesn't really make sense to trade him unless the team falls out of contention at the deadline.
29 sept. 2020 à 7 h 4
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,213
Mentions "j'aime": 744
Quoting: p1015983
Habs don't trade Domi for another centre. Makes no sense


it was assuming they trade domi and danault
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage