SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Whos Sandersons comparables

Créé par: csick
Équipe: 2020-21 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 27 sept. 2020
Publié: 27 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
It’s becoming a big possibility at 5th overall. I don’t think he’s better than Byram but is he more like Slavin type?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Sanderson, Jake
3925 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYI
Logo de OTT
Logo de WPG
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
2021
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1181 500 000 $39 162 500 $0 $2 500 000 $42 337 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Sanderson, Jake
925 000 $925 000 $

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 sept. 2020 à 20 h 29
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,590
Mentions "j'aime": 18,152
I stink at the NHL comparisons, Ryan Suter is one I see used a lot that makes sense.

Sanderson is an excellent skater. More explosive than end-to-end speed. Burst is A++. Very strong with puck. Uses size well.

Enormously high ceiling.
27 sept. 2020 à 20 h 31
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
Quoting: csick
What’s his ceiling offensively?


From an offensive production level, if ends up as good as he is reputed to be defensive and he gives you 30-45 points, I think you would be delighted with that. Realistically I think he'll be close to 25-30 points, and a handful of goals every season.

He's a guy who can move the puck well with his mobility, and he definitely has a good enough offensive skillset to be a consensus top 10 pick but I wouldn't expect those gaudy point totals of a more offensive minded Dman.
csick a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2020 à 20 h 39
#28
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Quoting: csick
I have no idea but apparently Dorion really likes him and he’s going to UND where Dorion picked JBD, Tychonich and Pinto from there. I don’t understand it when there’s much better Franchise Dmen next year and we need RHD way more than LHD


Oh, that list of high impact players. Well guess I'll have to take a step back then.

No but seriously, reaching positionally and on the basis of uni selection should both be fireable offenses.
27 sept. 2020 à 20 h 48
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: csick
Hope not


He'll be a middle pairing DFD with some offensive ability, maybe Marcus Pettersson, probably a bit better
27 sept. 2020 à 20 h 50
#30
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,538
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
I would say best case scenario is Ryan Suter.

I really like him. It’s not often you can find a draft eligible kid that is an elite defender that is mobile in all 4 directions. The offence will come
csick a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2020 à 20 h 53
#31
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,185
Mentions "j'aime": 20,724
some are saying jake muzzin type minus the enormous physicality, thats what I heard.
27 sept. 2020 à 21 h 3
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,590
Mentions "j'aime": 18,152
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
From an offensive production level, if ends up as good as he is reputed to be defensive and he gives you 30-45 points, I think you would be delighted with that. Realistically I think he'll be close to 25-30 points, and a handful of goals every season.

He's a guy who can move the puck well with his mobility, and he definitely has a good enough offensive skillset to be a consensus top 10 pick but I wouldn't expect those gaudy point totals of a more offensive minded Dman.


I think point totals are misleading.

If a team is looking for an all-situations, 25+ minutes a night guy...a traditional #1 d-man...Sanderson is your guy.

If a team is looking for offensive, puck transition, 50-pt d-man...Drysdale is probably your guy.
27 sept. 2020 à 21 h 48
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I think point totals are misleading.

If a team is looking for an all-situations, 25+ minutes a night guy...a traditional #1 d-man...Sanderson is your guy.

If a team is looking for offensive, puck transition, 50-pt d-man...Drysdale is probably your guy.


Obviously points aren't a great metric to judge Dmen, especially defensive minded ones, but it's also the easiest way to get a point across in a discussion about offensive upside.

Obviously you're not really drafting Sanderson to be that type of Dman, but it's still worth considering his upside. For as good as he projects to be defensively, his offensive upside will be what tips the Scales between him being a good 3-4 or being a potential 1-2.
27 sept. 2020 à 22 h 19
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,590
Mentions "j'aime": 18,152
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Obviously points aren't a great metric to judge Dmen, especially defensive minded ones, but it's also the easiest way to get a point across in a discussion about offensive upside.

Obviously you're not really drafting Sanderson to be that type of Dman, but it's still worth considering his upside. For as good as he projects to be defensively, his offensive upside will be what tips the Scales between him being a good 3-4 or being a potential 1-2.


He has a lot of offensive upside. No one is considering him a 2nd pairing defensive d-man. Otherwise, we wouldn’t be having the conversation of whether he goes top-5 or top-10.
csick a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage