SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moves

Créé par: Sonuvabirch69
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 27 sept. 2020
Publié: 27 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
2775 000 $
1775 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1825 000 $
2950 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
55 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 200 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Drysdale, Jamie
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Deangelo, Anthony [Droits de RFA]
  2. Lundkvist, Nils [Liste de réserve]
  3. Smith, Brendan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (STL)
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (DET)
Détails additionnels:
#4-Drysdale
DET
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
#6- Rossi
#22- Anyone available at 22 (Zary, possibly)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de STL
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $67 194 582 $0 $0 $14 305 418 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 41
#1
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,586
Mentions "j'aime": 6,720
Rangers politely decline.
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 41
#2
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
1) We could get more for Lindholm and Rakell separately and NY is ****y when it comes to moving Nils

2) Gudbranson doesn’t need to be traded he’s been fine if anything we can just buy him out.

3) Most mock drafts have Drysdale falling to 6 or 7. We shouldn’t trade more picks. And even if he does get picked we should go after Holtz or Rossi.
DucksFan55 a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 43
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Rangers politely decline.


You guys would win this I would think.
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 46
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
1) We could get more for Lindholm and Rakell separately and NY is ****y when it comes to moving Nils

2) Gudbranson doesn’t need to be traded he’s been fine if anything we can just buy him out.

3) Most mock drafts have Drysdale falling to 6 or 7. We shouldn’t trade more picks. And even if he does get picked we should go after Holtz or Rossi.


1)Then that’s why Anaheim should go after him they need RHDs for the future.

2)I know he’s been fine but that cap hit tho.

3)I see Drysdale falling to 6 but I would expect the Ducks to trade up in order to actually secure him.
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 47
#5
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
1)Then that’s why Anaheim should go after him they need RHDs for the future.

2)I know he’s been fine but that cap hit tho.

3)I see Drysdale falling to 6 but I would expect the Ducks to trade up in order to actually secure him.


If we draft Drysdale we won’t need Nils. If Drysdale is taken Holtz would be just as fine because we need scoring just as badly as we need defense.
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 49
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
If we draft Drysdale we won’t need Nils. If Drysdale is taken Holtz would be just as fine because we need scoring just as badly as we need defense.


Their top priority is defense
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 51
#7
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
Their top priority is defense


They need immediate help for defense. They need scoring for the future considering Rakell Silfverberg and Henrique will all be gone soon.
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 55
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Rossi>Drysdale
RedWing9119 a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 55
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: Dan10900
Rossi>Drysdale


In terms of NHL readiness, yes.
27 sept. 2020 à 19 h 57
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
In terms of NHL readiness, yes.


and potential
RedWing9119 a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2020 à 20 h 12
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 115
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
1) We could get more for Lindholm and Rakell separately and NY is ****y when it comes to moving Nils

2) Gudbranson doesn’t need to be traded he’s been fine if anything we can just buy him out.

3) Most mock drafts have Drysdale falling to 6 or 7. We shouldn’t trade more picks. And even if he does get picked we should go after Holtz or Rossi.


Agree with all of this, hate the idea of trading up. At this point we just need to acquire as many assets as possible and I don't think the drop off between 4 and 6 is very significant talent-wise. Also Gudbranson wasn't awful and it makes more sense to just eat the cap hit for one more year rather than prolong the problem. Not like he's blocking anyone or is keeping us from signing a free agent (that I'm aware of). The Rangers trade seems around fair, if anything favoring NYR a bit. I agree that you'd probably get more dealing them separately.
Stgstg55 et Sonuvabirch69 a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2020 à 20 h 48
#12
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,583
Mentions "j'aime": 8,265
From a Detroit point of view unless they at crazy in love witht Drysdale they make that deal. I love Rossi in this draft but at 6 you get either Raymond or Rossi and an extra 1st you have to do it
Sonuvabirch69 et JimmyV1993 a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2020 à 20 h 54
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: DucksFan55
Agree with all of this, hate the idea of trading up. At this point we just need to acquire as many assets as possible and I don't think the drop off between 4 and 6 is very significant talent-wise. Also Gudbranson wasn't awful and it makes more sense to just eat the cap hit for one more year rather than prolong the problem. Not like he's blocking anyone or is keeping us from signing a free agent (that I'm aware of). The Rangers trade seems around fair, if anything favoring NYR a bit. I agree that you'd probably get more dealing them separately.


Maybe I just hate Gudbranson because of his time in Vancouver...
27 sept. 2020 à 21 h 0
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 126
Mentions "j'aime": 30
If I’m Yzerman, I 100% do that deal. The opportunity to snag one of Reichel/Peterka/Amirov available at #22 is too enticing.
Sonuvabirch69 a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2020 à 22 h 59
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 115
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
Maybe I just hate Gudbranson because of his time in Vancouver...


That's very possible... when we first traded for him I thought it was awful based on his reputation but he actually seemed at least competent. If his cap hit was like 2ish I'd say that's fair and he'd be a nice bottom pairing option.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage