SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cernak and Gudas

Créé par: Trickster
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 25 sept. 2020
Publié: 25 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Assuming Wennberg gets bought by Columbus.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 000 000 $
21 550 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
2850 000 $
43 300 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Wennberg, Alex
31 555 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Cernak, Erik4 000 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2021
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
2.
TOR
  1. Vukojevic, Michael [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
4.
STL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de NJD
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 407 283 $0 $0 $92 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Wennberg, Alex
1 555 000 $1 555 000 $
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 sept. 2020 à 15 h 54
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: Trickster
Not on board with moving Nylander.
Rather move Marner.

Neither is realistic.

Kuemper I feel is much better choice over others.
Who do you want? Most people just wanna leave goaltending issue till next season, but options then will be worse IMO.

Hampus Lindholm from Anaheim, I feel he is good defensive guy that i like.
Doubt Ducks move him though.


I'm not anymore either!!! That's right I said don't move Nylander or Marner!!!! Lol i know I was on that train for a while but got off lol.

He is a great choice but he's going to cost alot and unless we move someone like Willy or MarMar we won't be able to afford his next contract with a flat cap. We could sign someone like Markstrom or Kabudin or whoever on FA and save the assets. That's just my opinion tho. I'm with ya on not leaving it till next year.

Hampus is great but yeah, I can't see Anaheim doing that. Although I don't pretend to have any inside info or anything. I think the best person to ask would be @OldNYIfan because he likes both teams and always gives a unbiased opinion.
OldNYIfan, Trickster et oneX a aimé ceci.
26 sept. 2020 à 15 h 58
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: Trickster
I feel this is what everyone mostly says RE goaltending and Rielly.
It is time to think real hard about these decisions


I hate all these ACGM's going for Pietrangelo and having no cap space and not realizing that we already have our own problems to deal with and adding Alex would only make it harder to figure out. Too many thinking of the short term and not the bigger picture. Also, if the reason for bringing in Petro is to give Mo a partner what's the point when we won't be able to keep Rielly after 2 years?
OldNYIfan et Trickster a aimé ceci.
26 sept. 2020 à 16 h 4
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: Trickster
I dont like that return of Andersen.
Rather take 2 second rounders for him and maybe a prospect too.

What did you think of the Kapanen trade?


I'd take the 19thOA and Bennett (even if he is only here for a year). We could flip Ritich if Dubas wanted too but I don't think we would get a better return than that for him. You would rather have 2 seconds than a mid 1st and a kerfoot replacement for a year?

I think the Kapanen deal was highway robbery by Dubas and am glad he made that trade. But Kapanen gone is also part of the reason I wouldn't move Nylander. Marner won't bring back the same value because he doesn't provide as much bang for your buck IMO.
OldNYIfan et Trickster a aimé ceci.
26 sept. 2020 à 16 h 20
#29
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
Hampus is great but yeah, I can't see Anaheim doing that. Although I don't pretend to have any inside info or anything. I think the best person to ask would be @OldNYIfan because he likes both teams and always gives a unbiased opinion.


I can't see Lindholm as the solution to your problem because they've never even tried him at RD (unlike Cam Fowler, who has had mixed results there).

I saw a trade earlier today by a Leafs "fan" which was awful for Toronto but suggested the following to me: Marner and Liljegren for Rakell, Manson and the Boston first. (Of course, I'd much rather give you the 2021 first, but I'm trying to be honest.)
Trickster et Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
26 sept. 2020 à 17 h 5
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I can't see Lindholm as the solution to your problem because they've never even tried him at RD (unlike Cam Fowler, who has had mixed results there).

I saw a trade earlier today by a Leafs "fan" which was awful for Toronto but suggested the following to me: Marner and Liljegren for Rakell, Manson and the Boston first. (Of course, I'd much rather give you the 2021 first, but I'm trying to be honest.)


@Trickster and I were talking about moving Rielly out because we won't be able to afford him. He suggested he'd like to trade him for Hampus which I think is a great player just not sure your Ducks would want to pay him what he wants in 2 years but truth be told I have no idea which is why I wanted your opinion.

You're right that would be a bad trade for us. I've had a few Ducks fans tell me Rakell who I've always liked isn't the same player he once was not sure how true that is but if so we probably wouldn't resign him. And I have no idea why leaf fans keep beating the Manson to the leafs horse with a stick. He isn't what we need and you guys need him more it doesn't make sense for either side. Personally, the players on the ducks I would want is Gibson which isn't happening and Jones again ain't happening unless we give up Lilly which doesn't make sense for us. Some people are just homers lol
Trickster et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 sept. 2020 à 17 h 48
#31
Démarrer sujet
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
@Trickster and I were talking about moving Rielly out because we won't be able to afford him. He suggested he'd like to trade him for Hampus which I think is a great player just not sure your Ducks would want to pay him what he wants in 2 years but truth be told I have no idea which is why I wanted your opinion.

You're right that would be a bad trade for us. I've had a few Ducks fans tell me Rakell who I've always liked isn't the same player he once was not sure how true that is but if so we probably wouldn't resign him. And I have no idea why leaf fans keep beating the Manson to the leafs horse with a stick. He isn't what we need and you guys need him more it doesn't make sense for either side. Personally, the players on the ducks I would want is Gibson which isn't happening and Jones again ain't happening unless we give up Lilly which doesn't make sense for us. Some people are just homers lol


My friend you need to make ACGM.
I'd love to see what you can come with.

Cheers!
OldNYIfan, oneX et Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
26 sept. 2020 à 18 h 52
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,123
Mentions "j'aime": 246
Quoting: Trickster
Your not wrong, heard Leafs might be look at Craig Smith as UFA.

I just liked what I saw in Wennberg in the playin.


Source?
26 sept. 2020 à 19 h 18
#33
Démarrer sujet
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: EnvironmentalTwister
Source?


I article I was reading on lastword
26 sept. 2020 à 19 h 19
#34
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
You're right that would be a bad trade for us. I've had a few Ducks fans tell me Rakell who I've always liked isn't the same player he once was not sure how true that is but if so we probably wouldn't resign him. And I have no idea why leaf fans keep beating the Manson to the leafs horse with a stick. He isn't what we need and you guys need him more it doesn't make sense for either side. Personally, the players on the ducks I would want is Gibson which isn't happening and Jones again ain't happening unless we give up Lilly which doesn't make sense for us. Some people are just homers lol


Hah!! You think THAT trade is bad? That's the version I created trying to make the original idea close to fair. The original postulation was Marner, Kerfoot and Liljegren for Rakell and Manson. Period.
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
26 sept. 2020 à 22 h 12
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,744
Mentions "j'aime": 2,601
Quoting: Sign_em_up000000


100% we need to add grit but we also need it to come from within and I don't see that happening anytime soon.

I also agree on your goaltending take. It doesn't make sense to extend a goalie on the wrong side of 30 who has had back and groin injuries in the past plus such a heavy workload. To me it's a recipe for disaster. That being said, I would look to trade Andersen this offseason and sign a FA. Not sure if it's true but I heard a rumour I believe it was Lebrun but don't quote me who said CGY offered Dubas their 1st+Bennett+ Ritich and Dubas said no because he wasn't sold on a Ritich/Campbell tandem?!?... I would have taken that deal all day long.

I know trading Rielly won't make us better but he has 2 yearz left at a very affordable contract making him extremely valuable to other teams and we likely can't afford his next contract so I would rather be proactive and at least explore what we could get for him rather than letting him walk for nothing as we've already done that too many times. I know Sandin needs to take another step forward but maybe we get a cheaper LHD come back as part of the package or sign someone through FA on the short term or just let Muzzin/Dermott/Sandin take the reigns and see how they do seems how we won't be competing for a cup anytime soon anyways.



Rittich: I think he has mostly proven that he's a decent NHL backup but not a great starting goalie in this league. He was NOT able roll off 7-8 wins during the season behind what I would consider is a better defense core than Toronto's. He would be horrendous IMO behind the Leafs D core.
So really... not a good option IMO.

As far as trading Rielly goes, look I'm not against trading him but the Leafs window to win is between now and the end of Matthews' contract. I just don't see how this team and organization moves forward having success by trading Rielly. Dermott and Sandin are not at the level where the Leafs need them to be. Not saying they won't get there but it's not happening overnight.

There's just no sexy move to be made that's instantly going to make this D core improved big time (unless Dubas changes his mind on Marner/Nylander and signs Pietrangelo). The simple move is to sign a combination of DeMelo, Gudas, Braun, or other under-the-radar D man to upgrade the right side.

As soon as you trade Rielly, you will be looking for a D who can eat up ice time like he does.
Trickster et Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2020 à 2 h 37
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Modifié 27 sept. 2020 à 4 h 23
Quoting: Trickster
I'd be okay with that, obviously no one is give a 2nd rounder for Holl though.


I doubt Dermott will land you 2nd also......from some other Thread where TML trade assets were over-evaluated ( Post #18 ):
https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/366142

Pietrangelo :
as much as I am in doubts about it and would go for 2 middle range complementaries for Rielly and Muzzin....but i think Dubarellis plan is Pietrangelo.... If Kapanen trade wasnt something to heal his ego cause all the flak he got from losing 2020 1st with Marleau, then i think Dubarelli is signaling hes on the way to make something larger...exactly what Pietrangelo is...especially with all the names that are coming out being on the block too ( which is complete 3rd Line depth )
Hes nerd, he wants to show his old schoolmates how wrong they were and i think Pietrangelo is his way of ALL IN......imagine bringing a parade to Toronto after 1967.....he would get a statue next to WW2 victory mausoleum ( i dont know if that even exist in CAN so probably just bad reference )

Goalies :
I was for re-signing Andersen all the way for 4 x 6,5M, but with Covid situation that wont be doable....so play him this Season ( cause Goalies are much more valuable to current Teams then they are to others in giving up trading assets ) and go for Allen 5 x 5 next year in FA
28 sept. 2020 à 18 h 27
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: Trickster
My friend you need to make ACGM.
I'd love to see what you can come with.

Cheers!


Challenge accepted lol but it's gonna be uneventful lol
OldNYIfan et Trickster a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2020 à 18 h 50
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Hah!! Do you think THAT trade is bad? That's the version I created trying to make the original idea close to fair. The original postulation was Marner, Kerfoot and Liljegren for Rakell and Manson. Period.


Don't understand the hostility but yes, I think it is bad and I'll explain why. For a while I was all for moving one of Marner or Nylander (mostly Nylander because I felt it was a better bang for your buck contract and you gotta give to get) for a top-pairing defenceman however, we just moved Kapanen who would have stepped into their role. I realize Anaheim would be sending us Rakell but that just adds to our problem we were talking about. We are already going to have trouble extending Rielly in two years let alone Rakell & Manson (I realize we'd be saving money by moving Marner out but signing those three players in the same offseason as UFA's would be damn near impossible IMO and the Ducks can't afford him especially if Kessler comes back like alot are saying), or we let them walk for nothing which I'd be fine with if we were in a position to take two serious runs at a cup but we aren't, or at least as of right now our core hasn't shown that on a consistent basis. Look at the Raptors beating the Golden State Warriors, they played for each other and had the we're going to war die for your brother sitting next to you mind mentality that's why we won IMO. Yes we had Kawhi and I'm not downplaying his contributions but he didn't win it alone and the Leafs don't have that at least not yet.

I wasn't trying to be insulting if that's how you took my response I sincerely apologize that was never my intention. I was merely trying to give my honest opinion the way things currently stand for our team. Our fan base has alot of homers who post alot of bad trades usually in our team's favour (not saying I'm perfect by any means) and honestly, their trade is downright terrible for us because like I said to many leaf fans are looking at the here and now and not thinking about the bigger picture and how certain trades will affect us down the road. Same goes for signing Pietrangelo it would help us next year but after that it would only make things that much more difficult. How would these leaf fans feel if we lose Rielly or Nylander in 2 years because we gave petro a huge contact especially down the road in 3-4 years when he is no longer in his prime?

Again, my point/comment was never meant to insult you I was merely trying to look at the bigger picture. I'm going to post an ACGM shortly of what I think the leafs should do you may feel free to rip in to me there if you'd like.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2020 à 19 h 0
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 4,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
Quoting: oneX
Rittich: I think he has mostly proven that he's a decent NHL backup but not a great starting goalie in this league. He was NOT able roll off 7-8 wins during the season behind what I would consider is a better defense core than Toronto's. He would be horrendous IMO behind the Leafs D core.
So really... not a good option IMO.

As far as trading Rielly goes, look I'm not against trading him but the Leafs window to win is between now and the end of Matthews' contract. I just don't see how this team and organization moves forward having success by trading Rielly. Dermott and Sandin are not at the level where the Leafs need them to be. Not saying they won't get there but it's not happening overnight.

There's just no sexy move to be made that's instantly going to make this D core improved big time (unless Dubas changes his mind on Marner/Nylander and signs Pietrangelo). The simple move is to sign a combination of DeMelo, Gudas, Braun, or other under-the-radar D man to upgrade the right side.

As soon as you trade Rielly, you will be looking for a D who can eat up ice time like he does.


I'm not saying you're wrong about Ritich but the draw for me was the 19thOA and Bennett. Dubas could flip Ritich hell, attach a 7th and send him to a team for a 6th then sign a goalie on the FA market.

I love Rielly too, just like every other leafs fan but with a flat cap and him already taking a team-friendly contract last time plus this being his last chance to cash in big and what he'd be able to command on the open market I think he's going to cost more than alot of people think. I could be wrong and I hope I am because I'll gladly eat crow if he signs for a reasonable amount but I'm not banking on it.

I realize we would be downgrading our D by moving him out, I just want our FO to be proactive this time around instead of letting another player walk for nothing when we could have gotten a nice return. I guess that's my point if he's gone regardless wouldn't you rather gain assets for him instead of nothing?

I also agree about going after the secondary D FA's rather than a big fish. I'm going to post an ACGM in a bit, I'll tag you in it.
Trickster et oneX a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage