SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

No trades

Créé par: Eli
Équipe: 2020-21 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 25 sept. 2020
Publié: 25 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
People are commenting like the Caps have salaries they'd like to get rid of. I can't imagine why. They won the division and everybody played pretty well.

Is it fun to discuss options, in case the team wants to make a big move? Sure. But here's the team they have, plus $5.5M in UFAs, with 1M in cap space left over.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 200 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
62 500 000 $
63 000 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2700 000 $
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de WSH
Logo de ARI
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de VGK
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $70 256 545 $419 749 $600 000 $11 243 455 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
716 667 $716 667 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 44
#1
twentyeighteen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,246
Mentions "j'aime": 495
I would not commit to B Dizzy and Namest for 6 years. The rest are some nice bargain prices for sure.
AndrewLadd et Eli a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 13 h 13
#2
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: markykins1
I would not commit to B Dizzy and Namest for 6 years. The rest are some nice bargain prices for sure.


Those might not stay great deals forever, sure, but Dillon plays well with Carlson, and I'm optimistic that Namestnikov might find good linemates in WSH.
25 sept. 2020 à 13 h 47
#3
Typical Caps Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 702
Mentions "j'aime": 346
I'm guessing you think the only major problem with the Caps was the coaching with this lineup? Losing Holtby might be a net positive, Sammy/Vanacek do better overall I suspect.
25 sept. 2020 à 13 h 59
#4
twentyeighteen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,246
Mentions "j'aime": 495
Quoting: Eli
Those might not stay great deals forever, sure, but Dillon plays well with Carlson, and I'm optimistic that Namestnikov might find good linemates in WSH.


I don't know. I'm kinda meh on Dillion now, won't cry if he signs somewhere else to be honest. Plus, he might not fit what the new coach wants so I won't mind if they look elsewhere. I like Namestnikov as a 3rd, sometimes 2nd liner. He could go to the left wing which could bump Hags to the 4th line where he belongs.
25 sept. 2020 à 14 h 30
#5
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Kylonetic8
I'm guessing you think the only major problem with the Caps was the coaching with this lineup? Losing Holtby might be a net positive, Sammy/Vanacek do better overall I suspect.


Kind of. Every team has a lot of things it could improve.

The team won the division last year with basically the above lineup, plus a week or two of Kovalchuk.

Are Samsonov and Vanecek as good as Holtby by save percentage behind similar defenses? Probably. Samsonov's stats looked better than Holtby's last year with both on WSH. The year before, Vanecek's stats looked better than Samsonov's with both in Hershey. But the NHL season is long and opponents are rough on goalies. Holtby has the endurance to lead a team through a season and the playoffs. Samsonov might not, yet.

I created a player for a $1M post-buyout Marc-Andre Fleury, above, as a backup option if Holtby gets a big UFA offer, but then I deleted it because it was beside the point.

Quoting: markykins1
I don't know. I'm kinda meh on Dillion now, won't cry if he signs somewhere else to be honest. Plus, he might not fit what the new coach wants so I won't mind if they look elsewhere. I like Namestnikov as a 3rd, sometimes 2nd liner. He could go to the left wing which could bump Hags to the 4th line where he belongs.


Dillon played some tough minutes in WSH and got some great corsi, but not much personal offense. He's a big guy who stays in position and plays the body, not the puck. That's the classic type of guy you pair with a puck carrier like Carlson. On the other hand, Carlson didn't get many points playing with Dillon, and didn't win a playoff series. So maybe Carlson and Kempny play pretty well together, just based on points and series wins, even if nothing about Kempny's pre-Carlson stats or style said "top pairing D?"

I'd love to see Namestnikov center Ovechkin and Kuznetsov, so Kuznetsov doesn't have to backcheck as much, and has more energy in his legs to create rushes. That's the way the above contract turns out very good. Otherwise, it turns out to be just slightly a bad deal for the team, but for a very long time. The only things Namestnikov brings that Hagelin doesn't are right-handed faceoffs and speaking Russian.
markykins1 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 15 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 630
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: markykins1
I don't know. I'm kinda meh on Dillion now, won't cry if he signs somewhere else to be honest. Plus, he might not fit what the new coach wants so I won't mind if they look elsewhere. I like Namestnikov as a 3rd, sometimes 2nd liner. He could go to the left wing which could bump Hags to the 4th line where he belongs.


Tarik's article in the Athletic yesterday made it seem like getting Dillon signed was the top priority right now, so I'd assume they've talked with Lavi and he's on board with it.
Eli a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 15 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 630
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: Eli
Dillon played some tough minutes in WSH and got some great corsi, but not much personal offense. He's a big guy who stays in position and plays the body, not the puck. That's the classic type of guy you pair with a puck carrier like Carlson. On the other hand, Carlson didn't get many points playing with Dillon, and didn't win a playoff series. So maybe Carlson and Kempny play pretty well together, just based on points and series wins, even if nothing about Kempny's pre-Carlson stats or style said "top pairing D?"


In the regular season when they were paired together, I think they just had really bad puck luck. They had a 0.946 PDO together, which is by far the lowest Carlson had with anyone he played at least 100 minutes with. That suggests the lack of offense from Carlson is just an artifact of the small sample size. In the playoffs, Carlson got hurt right away and I don't think he was ever 100% after that, so it's pretty hard to grade the pairing for that stretch. The early results were promising enough that I want to see more of Dillon and Carlson together, personally.
markykins1 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 16 h 29
#8
twentyeighteen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,246
Mentions "j'aime": 495
Quoting: Kalopsia
In the regular season when they were paired together, I think they just had really bad puck luck. They had a 0.946 PDO together, which is by far the lowest Carlson had with anyone he played at least 100 minutes with. That suggests the lack of offense from Carlson is just an artifact of the small sample size. In the playoffs, Carlson got hurt right away and I don't think he was ever 100% after that, so it's pretty hard to grade the pairing for that stretch. The early results were promising enough that I want to see more of Dillon and Carlson together, personally.


You guys are right about the sample size. If they sign him fine. I won't hate it. I like his size and the fact that he punched Malkin in the face several times. wink
Kylonetic8 et Kalopsia a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 16 h 31
#9
twentyeighteen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,246
Mentions "j'aime": 495
Quoting: Eli
Kind of. Every team has a lot of things it could improve.

The team won the division last year with basically the above lineup, plus a week or two of Kovalchuk.

Are Samsonov and Vanecek as good as Holtby by save percentage behind similar defenses? Probably. Samsonov's stats looked better than Holtby's last year with both on WSH. The year before, Vanecek's stats looked better than Samsonov's with both in Hershey. But the NHL season is long and opponents are rough on goalies. Holtby has the endurance to lead a team through a season and the playoffs. Samsonov might not, yet.

I created a player for a $1M post-buyout Marc-Andre Fleury, above, as a backup option if Holtby gets a big UFA offer, but then I deleted it because it was beside the point.



Dillon played some tough minutes in WSH and got some great corsi, but not much personal offense. He's a big guy who stays in position and plays the body, not the puck. That's the classic type of guy you pair with a puck carrier like Carlson. On the other hand, Carlson didn't get many points playing with Dillon, and didn't win a playoff series. So maybe Carlson and Kempny play pretty well together, just based on points and series wins, even if nothing about Kempny's pre-Carlson stats or style said "top pairing D?"

I'd love to see Namestnikov center Ovechkin and Kuznetsov, so Kuznetsov doesn't have to backcheck as much, and has more energy in his legs to create rushes. That's the way the above contract turns out very good. Otherwise, it turns out to be just slightly a bad deal for the team, but for a very long time. The only things Namestnikov brings that Hagelin doesn't are right-handed faceoffs and speaking Russian.


I'm scared of seeing Kuz on the wing. I don't think he can handle getting creamed to the boards as many times as wingers do. He's gotten his hand and shoulder hurt a few times I've seen him driven into the boards over the years, don't think he's durable enough but what do i know?
Eli a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 16 h 38
#10
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: markykins1
I'm scared of seeing Kuz on the wing. I don't think he can handle getting creamed to the boards as many times as wingers do. He's gotten his hand and shoulder hurt a few times I've seen him driven into the boards over the years, don't think he's durable enough but what do i know?


Good point. But I'm just as scared when I see Kuznetsov heading into the faceoff dot to give the puck away. smile There's probably a compromise, like having them each take strong side draws, having Kuznetsov play center ahead of the red line, so he's not banging around in the corners, and having any right handed center, even if it's just Boyd, play RW in the offensive zone, banging in the corners, and center in the defensive zone, banging in front of his own net. Detroit used to have guys cover the corners for Lidstrom so he could focus on carrying the puck, and not get hurt. Kuznetsov is worth the same special treatment, but that's no reason for him to start 55% of shifts without the puck.
markykins1 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage