SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Oilers

Créé par: cody_tugak
Équipe: 2020-21 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 25 sept. 2020
Publié: 25 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 300 000 $
22 750 000 $
12 250 000 $
2925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
11 750 000 $
22 000 000 $
24 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (DET)
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Neal, James
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NJD
Logo de EDM
Logo de DET
Logo de EDM
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $80 377 699 $341 534 $230 000 $1 122 301 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 sept. 2020 à 11 h 51
#1
The other ones Drai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,860
Mentions "j'aime": 689
i dont think you need to add a first to the neal deal
maybe a 2nd
cody_tugak a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 11 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 933
Mentions "j'aime": 385
Luckily for you, Ken Holland has a hard stance against trading first round picks in dumps and in general
cody_tugak et ConnorMcJesus a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 11 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,638
Mentions "j'aime": 11,995
Since Russel has only 1yr left on his deal I just can't see Detroit giving any pick to rent him. Rebuilding teams just don't rent players.
25 sept. 2020 à 11 h 59
#4
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,914
Mentions "j'aime": 5,352
Edmonton adds a 3rd for us to take Russell or they can keep the cap hit
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 0
#5
Démarrer sujet
Mr.T 17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 338
Quoting: buffbry
Edmonton adds a 3rd for us to take Russell or they can keep the cap hit


Deal
buffbry a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 0
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,484
Mentions "j'aime": 1,224
Detroit does not want Russell and since he’s overpaid you’d need to add a sweetner
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 1
#7
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,914
Mentions "j'aime": 5,352
Quoting: cody_tugak
Deal


Perfect we have an accord
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 11
#8
Démarrer sujet
Mr.T 17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 338
Quoting: redwingsfan04
Detroit does not want Russell and since he’s overpaid you’d need to add a sweetner


Oilers add a 3rd in 2021, reason for this trade is the young defense that the wings have will be given one more year of development to make a proper impact to the league and for the team
redwingsfan04 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 13
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: cody_tugak
Deal


Bad deal. Russell will have value at the deadline.
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
You pay out a 1st to get rid of 20-goal scorer James Neal and then spend the money on a bunch of has-beens. Is your name Peter?
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 20
#11
Démarrer sujet
Mr.T 17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 338
Quoting: CD282
You pay out a 1st to get rid of 20-goal scorer James Neal and then spend the money on a bunch of has-beens. Is your name Peter?


If we had more cap space I'd sign Pietrangelo and Hall, but we don't
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 42
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: cody_tugak
If we had more cap space I'd sign Pietrangelo and Hall, but we don't

If you move Neal and Russell with nothing coming back, you DO have enough space to sign Pietrangelo or Hall, you just chose to spend it on crappy players.

You could've signed a better backup than Holtby for much less. You could've signed a better winger than Galchenyuk for much less. You could've signed a better 4C for much less. But you didn't and now all your cap space has been soaked up by mediocre players.
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 48
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: CD282
You pay out a 1st to get rid of 20-goal scorer James Neal and then spend the money on a bunch of has-beens. Is your name Peter?

James Neal is on the decline and is a PP specialist. Calling him a 20 goal scorer may be a bit disingenuous considering he shot 44% higher this year. Does he repeat that unsustainable SH% or does he regress? I don’t think he will dip all the way to Calgary lows but he isn’t a sure bet 20 goal scorer anymore nor does he provide value on the PK.
25 sept. 2020 à 13 h 1
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: BStinson
James Neal is on the decline and is a PP specialist. Calling him a 20 goal scorer may be a bit disingenuous considering he shot 44% higher this year. Does he repeat that unsustainable SH% or does he regress? I don’t think he will dip all the way to Calgary lows but he isn’t a sure bet 20 goal scorer anymore nor does he provide value on the PK.


He took just over 2 shots per game last year, if healthy for a full season that's 167 shots. His career SH% is 11.9%

167 x .119 = 19.873 goals

His shooting volume was actually way down in 19-20, his career average is 2.96 shots/GP, or 243 shots per 82.

243 x .119 = 28.9 goals

Calling him a 20 goal scorer is not "a bit disingenuous" because it isn't based on the 16.96 SH% he posted last year.
25 sept. 2020 à 13 h 12
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: CD282
He took just over 2 shots per game last year, if healthy for a full season that's 167 shots. His career SH% is 11.9%

167 x .119 = 19.873 goals

His shooting volume was actually way down in 19-20, his career average is 2.96 shots/GP, or 243 shots per 82.

243 x .119 = 28.9 goals

Calling him a 20 goal scorer is not "a bit disingenuous" because it isn't based on the 16.96 SH% he posted last year.

When was the last time Neal was healthy for a full season? You aren’t accounting for regression as he isn’t getting any younger and doesn’t skate like he use too. Your projecting stats under the context he’s getting top 6 mins and PP time (18+ mins) a game. Like I said he isn’t a shoe in that’s going to pot 20 goals but that doesn’t mean he can’t do it. He potted 12 PPG last year which is the most since 2011-2012 season. He’s averages around 4 in the past 5-6 years so that’s why I said a “bit disingenuous“ as he gets less PP time and EV time volume will decrease. He’s not a net positive EV performer and it will be be interesting to see what Edmonton’s top 6 looks like next year.
25 sept. 2020 à 13 h 23
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: BStinson
When was the last time Neal was healthy for a full season? You aren’t accounting for regression as he isn’t getting any younger and doesn’t skate like he use too. Your projecting stats under the context he’s getting top 6 mins and PP time (18+ mins) a game. Like I said he isn’t a shoe in that’s going to pot 20 goals but that doesn’t mean he can’t do it. He potted 12 PPG last year which is the most since 2011-2012 season. He’s averages around 4 in the past 5-6 years so that’s why I said a “bit disingenuous“ as he gets less PP time and EV time volume will decrease. He’s not a net positive EV performer and it will be be interesting to see what Edmonton’s top 6 looks like next year.


2015-16 was the last time he played 82 games. He scored 31 that year. Here are his goal scoring pace numbers for the past few years projected over 82 games, with actual goals in brackets:

2015-16: 31 (31)
2016-17: 27 (23)
2017-18: 29 (25)
2018-19: 9 (7)
2019-20: 28 (19 + 2 in 4 play-in games)

Yeah, I don't see how calling him a 20 goal scorer is in any way disingenuous. It accounts for decline. His normal pace is closer to 30 and he's actually scored at least 20 in 4 of the past 5 years (NHL deemed him to have hit 20 this year which triggered a trade condition).
25 sept. 2020 à 13 h 35
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: CD282
2015-16 was the last time he played 82 games. He scored 31 that year. Here are his goal scoring pace numbers for the past few years projected over 82 games, with actual goals in brackets:

2015-16: 31 (31)
2016-17: 27 (23)
2017-18: 29 (25)
2018-19: 9 (7)
2019-20: 28 (19 + 2 in 4 play-in games)

Yeah, I don't see how calling him a 20 goal scorer is in any way disingenuous. It accounts for decline. His normal pace is closer to 30 and he's actually scored at least 20 in 4 of the past 5 years (NHL deemed him to have hit 20 this year which triggered a trade condition).

What I’m saying is he hasn’t scored this level of PPG in quite awhile with an inflated SH% it points to anomaly. His EV goals the past two seasons have been 5 & 7 (respectively) but we are using data pre-Calgary to help boost his figures. Does he regress to his normal SH%? Does he get more ice time? Does he shoot more since those could be outliers like you pointed out? Does Neal’s ankle injuries linger effecting his skating? Can he play a full season? Does he play prolonged periods with McDavid again? That’s why I don’t overwhelmingly buy into a 20 goal season next year as a given or expectation
25 sept. 2020 à 13 h 46
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: BStinson
What I’m saying is he hasn’t scored this level of PPG in quite awhile with an inflated SH% it points to anomaly. His EV goals the past two seasons have been 5 & 7 (respectively) but we are using data pre-Calgary to help boost his figures. Does he regress to his normal SH%? Does he get more ice time? Does he shoot more since those could be outliers like you pointed out? Does Neal’s ankle injuries linger effecting his skating? Can he play a full season? Does he play prolonged periods with McDavid again? That’s why I don’t overwhelmingly buy into a 20 goal season next year as a given or expectation


His ES shot metrics / expected goals looked great this year, I think a lot of the issue was simply puck luck. He was overly lucky on the PP and overly unlucky at ES, I think that will even out somewhat going forward.

http://naturalstattrick.com/playerreport.php?fromseason=20192020&thruseason=20192020&stype=2&sit=ev&stdoi=std&rate=r&v=p&playerid=8471707
BStinson a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage