SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

stringing rumors

Créé par: MinnesnowtaWild
Équipe: 2020-21 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 24 sept. 2020
Publié: 24 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
According to insider trading if the Wild can't get a top 6 C they would instead ask for "a higher first round pick and a good young player." First team that popped in my mind was the Jets. Is this a fit or is it too much to ask for Dumba still?

Donato to Nashville was just something I saw on reddit and frees up a roster spot.

Byfuglien signing is me taking a guess after Russo said they would add a physical guy on the back end and that he had a story he was sitting on.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 750 000 $
22 750 000 $
22 000 000 $
1900 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
32 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
2.
MIN
  1. Roslovic, Jack [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de WPG
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $69 957 758 $0 $925 000 $11 542 242 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 487 500 $1 487 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 sept. 2020 à 23 h 12
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Honestly I would despise moving Dumba for 10th overall and Roslovic. 10th overall probably gets us Lundell and personally I view him as a worse Eriksson Ek and I don't think Roslovic can stick at center. I know I'm in a pretty large minority on Lundell but I just don't think his offense will translate to the NHL. If we can't get a top 6 center then just keep him and protect 8 skaters in expansion.
24 sept. 2020 à 23 h 19
#2
Démarrer sujet
MinnesnowtaWild
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 36
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: TanSor
Honestly I would despise moving Dumba for 10th overall and Roslovic. 10th overall probably gets us Lundell and personally I view him as a worse Eriksson Ek and I don't think Roslovic can stick at center. I know I'm in a pretty large minority on Lundell but I just don't think his offense will translate to the NHL. If we can't get a top 6 center then just keep him and protect 8 skaters in expansion.


I'm weary on Lundell too but I'm honestly expecting us to take him at 9 anyways. Getting this pick would let us take the center and also snag BPA if a guy like Holtz falls or something. As for Roslovic, I don't know what he's good at which is why I put him on on wing and stuck Kunin at C. All in all don't know if Dumba's value will be any higher than it is now (ironically off a downseason) because GMs will smell blood in the water closer to expansion. So I think we just gotta take what we can get now.
TanSor a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 23 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,706
Mentions "j'aime": 6,973
Winnipeg won't move 10OA for a LD.
24 sept. 2020 à 23 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: TanSor
Honestly I would despise moving Dumba for 10th overall and Roslovic. 10th overall probably gets us Lundell and personally I view him as a worse Eriksson Ek and I don't think Roslovic can stick at center. I know I'm in a pretty large minority on Lundell but I just don't think his offense will translate to the NHL. If we can't get a top 6 center then just keep him and protect 8 skaters in expansion.


Honestly, I really wonder if Lundell is on the radar. With those back to back picks, it’s almost guaranteed we take one of Sanderson, Askarov, or Holtz and trade the other one to a mid teens pick for a higher risk, higher upside center (Mercer and Zary come to mind) plus more. The issue with pulling in Roslovic is that it forces even more moves with the forward group.
TanSor a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 23 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg won't move 10OA for a LD.


What about a RD?
RazWild et NorthStarHockey a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 23 h 56
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,414
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Honestly, if we can't get a top six center back or move up any higher than 9th ova. Yes, I'd do it.

As I've discussed with @TanSor before, I actually prefer Lundell over other options because of his defensive prowess and skill at faceoffs, which is something we now lack with Mikko officially gone.

Roslovic is a rhs, which we also need more of and having both 9th and 10th ova gives us some real options in the deepest draft in the past decade. If you can't get one of either Rossi or Perfetti, than it's in our best interest to pick up Lundell irregardless of how you feel about him. He's still the consensus best pick center available at that point. 10th ova in addition to 9th ova now gives us flexibility to really hedge our bets. Maybe you grab Askarov, or Sanderson, or maybe you go grab Jack Quinn.

Personally, I double down on center. I grab Jarvis with 10th ova, who draws comparisons to Brayden Point. Holloway or Mercer are also options. Maybe you take a chance on Lapierre.

I'd seriously consider it.
jnowariak, OutCold13, MNBassman and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 0 h 10
#7
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,916
Mentions "j'aime": 2,487
Quoting: RazWild
Honestly, if we can't get a top six center back or move up any higher than 9th ova. Yes, I'd do it.

As I've discussed with @TanSor before, I actually prefer Lundell over other options because of his defensive prowess and skill at faceoffs, which is something we now lack with Mikko officially gone.

Roslovic is a rhs, which we also need more of and having both 9th and 10th ova gives us some real options in the deepest draft in the past decade. If you can't get one of either Rossi or Perfetti, than it's in our best interest to pick up Lundell irregardless of how you feel about him. He's still the consensus best pick center available at that point. 10th ova in addition to 9th ova now gives us flexibility to really hedge our bets. Maybe you grab Askarov, or Sanderson, or maybe you go grab Jack Quinn.

Personally, I double down on center. I grab Jarvis with 10th ova, who draws comparisons to Brayden Point. Holloway or Mercer are also options. Maybe you take a chance on Lapierre.

I'd seriously consider it.


I'm good with Lundell at 9 overall. Like the idea of LaPierre but I'd probably trade back from 10 for him. If Wild get 9 and 10 I think from what's likely to be there I want Lundell and Sanderson.
25 sept. 2020 à 0 h 13
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,346
Mentions "j'aime": 3,385
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg won't move 10OA for a LD.


Phew, that was a close one. Luckily Dumba is a RD.

In terms of "taking what we can get" I guess it's fine, but I don't love it and would prefer to hang on to Dumba.
OutCold13 et RazWild a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 0 h 25
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,414
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Quoting: Paul13
I'm good with Lundell at 9 overall. Like the idea of LaPierre but I'd probably trade back from 10 for him. If Wild get 9 and 10 I think from what's likely to be there I want Lundell and Sanderson.


I love Sanderson from a prospect standpoint. He screams Ryan Suter clone and is the lhd we desperately need.

That said, he's the last pick the Wild should ever consider in this year's draft. Next year's is too loaded with good D prospects to make that mistake I think. We really should be looking to load up on forwards, specifically centers imo.
25 sept. 2020 à 0 h 40
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,208
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: TanSor
Honestly I would despise moving Dumba for 10th overall and Roslovic. 10th overall probably gets us Lundell and personally I view him as a worse Eriksson Ek and I don't think Roslovic can stick at center. I know I'm in a pretty large minority on Lundell but I just don't think his offense will translate to the NHL. If we can't get a top 6 center then just keep him and protect 8 skaters in expansion.


I find it funny that Lundell's offense won't translate but Khovanov's will?
25 sept. 2020 à 9 h 9
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg won't move 10OA for a LD.


Dumba is RD Brodin is LD So Dumba isn't a LD.
25 sept. 2020 à 10 h 8
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,706
Mentions "j'aime": 6,973
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Dumba is RD Brodin is LD So Dumba isn't a LD.


I'm mixing him up with Nurse. Dumba is an RD version of Nurse though but less physical, so still no interest. He doesn't play the style the Jets need.
DiehardRedWingsFan58 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 10 h 26
#13
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,141
Mentions "j'aime": 3,571
I would trade Dumba for Roslovic and the 10...and, i woukd strongly consider taking Sanderson and Lundell with the 2 picks...with Askarov, Quinn, and Jarvis under consideration as well.
25 sept. 2020 à 10 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: MNBassman
I would trade Dumba for Roslovic and the 10...and, i woukd strongly consider taking Sanderson and Lundell with the 2 picks...with Askarov, Quinn, and Jarvis under consideration as well.


I maintain that if this trade happens, we trade down to the mid teens and give somebody a shot at Askarov then we take Sanderson at 9/10 and pick a more offensive minded C in the mid teens. Sanderson fits our timeline to be mentored by the whole D corps and take over Suter’ role in 3ish years. I think Askarov is too long of a timeline for us and I wonder how Bill feels about negotiating with Russians.
MNBassman a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 10 h 43
#15
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,141
Mentions "j'aime": 3,571
Quoting: jnowariak
I maintain that if this trade happens, we trade down to the mid teens and give somebody a shot at Askarov then we take Sanderson at 9/10 and pick a more offensive minded C in the mid teens. Sanderson fits our timeline to be mentored by the whole D corps and take over Suter’ role in 3ish years. I think Askarov is too long of a timeline for us and I wonder how Bill feels about negotiating with Russians.


Jarvis and Sanderson would work great in your scenario.
jnowariak a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 10 h 43
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: MNBassman
Jarvis and Sanderson would work great in your scenario.


I don’t hate it.
MNBassman a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2020 à 11 h 53
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: wabit
I find it funny that Lundell's offense won't translate but Khovanov's will?


Never said it would. He does not look good in the KHL right niw
25 sept. 2020 à 12 h 22
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,208
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: TanSor
Never said it would. He does not look good in the KHL right niw


I'll take Lundell who already plays big boy hockey. There isn't anything about his game that I see not translating to the NHL. He is already making the plays without the time/space that the pretty centers coming from Jrs need. He already has a good base to build on for his d-zone game too. He's not flashy but shows up on the scorecard quite often.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage