SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Saw this on a NYI post Just wanted to take a look

Créé par: exo2769
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 24 sept. 2020
Publié: 24 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Any thoughts CHI fans? It's giving up right now for sure, but it's also getting longer term prospects with lower cap hits that aren't half bad at all.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Wahlstrom, Oliver
  2. Wilde, Bode
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Kubalik, Dominik [Droits de RFA]
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $66 806 098 $1 090 244 $5 670 000 $14 693 902 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 36
#1
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 10,711
Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
I think it’s a cool idea, but in the end I think the isles decline but it could j b me being too high on Wahlstrom. I do think it’s creative though
exo2769, csick, ChiHawk and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
They are prospects, sure, but both of them have fallen in status significantly since 2018. I wouldnt. Kubalik just proved he can score at the NHL level AND compete in the playoffs. We dont know about the other guys as of right now. Definitely would pass
exo2769 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 36
#3
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,131
Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
You probably would have to take Komarov/Clutterbuck back
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 37
#4
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: AndrewLadd
I think it’s a cool idea, but in the end I think the isles decline but it could j b me being too high on Wahlstrom. I do think it’s creative though


I think the value is fair I just don’t know why the Blackhawks would give up a guy who is young and already an elite goal scorer
exo2769 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 37
#5
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 10,711
Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
Quoting: Isles777
I think the value is fair I just don’t know why the Blackhawks would give up a guy who is young and already an elite goal scorer


The 🧢 most likely
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 38
#6
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
it doesnt help to trade 2 cheap assets for an RFA from an Isles perspective when they already need to sign Toews/Barzal/Pulock. I do wonder if Isles would consider trading Varlamov cuz i think hed be a good fit in Chicago
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 38
#7
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,578
Quoting: SlickWilly
They are prospects, sure, but both of them have fallen in status significantly since 2018. I wouldnt. Kubalik just proved he can score at the NHL level AND compete in the playoffs. We dont know about the other guys as of right now. Definitely would pass


There's $5M left that could result is maybe Lehner in lieu of Crow? Or Granlund on a 1 year prove it deal? It's interesting is all I'm saying.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 39
#8
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: AndrewLadd
The 🧢 most likely


They should do whatever it takes to retain kubalik, wahlstrom is close to untouchable for the isles, but for Kubalik id definitely trade him
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 39
#9
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,578
Quoting: csick
it doesnt help to trade 2 cheap assets for an RFA from an Isles perspective when they already need to sign Toews/Barzal/Pulock. I do wonder if Isles would consider trading Varlamov cuz i think hed be a good fit in Chicago


I would prefer to NOT have Varlomov and I do think it'll be a tough sell. I've read that he and Sorokin are really good friends. I wouldn't mess with that tandem if I were the NYI.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 40
#10
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 10,711
Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
Quoting: Isles777
They should do whatever it takes to retain kubalik, wahlstrom is close to untouchable for the isles, but for Kubalik id definitely trade him


It would take master maneuvering to be able to fit Barzal, Toews, Pulock and Kubalik though. And w out Wahlstrom and Wilde we don’t have many assets to dump bad contracts
exo2769 et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 40
#11
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: Isles777
They should do whatever it takes to retain kubalik, wahlstrom is close to untouchable for the isles, but for Kubalik id definitely trade him


yeah agreed
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 41
#12
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: AndrewLadd
It would take master maneuvering to be able to fit Barzal, Toews, Pulock and Kubalik though. And w out Wahlstrom and Wilde we don’t have many assets to dump bad contracts


I can see wilde being used to dump a contract, no shot they move wahlstrom IMO
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 42
#13
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 10,711
Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
Quoting: Isles777
I can see wilde being used to dump a contract, no shot they move wahlstrom IMO


He won’t be, but getting rid of the 2nd and Wilde leaves us with pretty much Bellows and our 2021 1st to move a bad contract which isn’t that much considering all the crappy contracts the isles have
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 43
#14
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: AndrewLadd
He won’t be, but getting rid of the 2nd and Wilde leaves us with pretty much Bellows and our 2021 1st to move a bad contract which isn’t that much considering all the crappy contracts the isles have


If they acquired Kubalik with these assets, Leddy, Bailey, and cizikas would all be traded and you don’t need to attach much, if any sweeteners to trade them
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 45
#15
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 10,711
Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
Quoting: Isles777
If they acquired Kubalik with these assets, Leddy, Bailey, and cizikas would all be traded and you don’t need to attach much, if any sweeteners to trade them


Yeah that’s true. Kubalik replaces Bailey in the top 6 and Leddy will prob b moved anyway. So it’s not that bad actually, and we could move Otto in for Zeeker, although trading him would sting
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 45
#16
NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,476
Mentions "j'aime": 1,101
Doesn't help our cap situation at all, but Kubalik seems like the type of player that makes sense for NYI. I'd rather have someone who's more established though.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 47
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
Quoting: exo2769
There's $5M left that could result is maybe Lehner in lieu of Crow? Or Granlund on a 1 year prove it deal? It's interesting is all I'm saying.


Oh for sure its interesting, and the cap definitely helps, but if we are dumping Kubalik for prospects that takes a little bit of the "win now" out of the sail unless you have someone filling that LW1 spot without creating another hole on the top 6. If I were looking to trade Kubalik, it probably wouldnt be a win now situation unless you're getting a D man back because either A.) you're flipping him for another equally or higher paid winger unless its a guy on an ELC, B.) you're trading him for prospects and the money is either used to fill that hole you just created or fill a hole elsewhere without addressing the hole you created, or C.) you trade him for a most likely equally paid LD without being able to address the hole you just created. If you trade Kubalik, there definitely has to be a little bit more to it than that, or atleast if its not for a win now situation, get some better prospects coming back. I think of the RFAs, trading Strome is the most likely for a win now, because we can fill his hole (lol) internally rather than having to go out on the market and look for someone else
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 48
#18
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,578
24 sept. 2020 à 16 h 53
#19
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: AndrewLadd
Yeah that’s true. Kubalik replaces Bailey in the top 6 and Leddy will prob b moved anyway. So it’s not that bad actually, and we could move Otto in for Zeeker, although trading him would sting


With cizikas injury history, I wouldn’t even re-sign him after next season
24 sept. 2020 à 17 h 4
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,185
Mentions "j'aime": 4,793
Not a fan
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 17 h 22
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 828
Mentions "j'aime": 715
Easy no for me as a hawks fan. Wahlstrom has been underwhelming since his draft year. Wilde isn't crazy special. Neither player has yet to play in the NHL and both of them honestly haven't done much in the AHL that warrants a return of a calder trophy finalist who just put up 30 goals.. We already have Mitchell and Boqvist on the right side, Wilde isn't even needed. Any team that wants Kubalik is going to have to overpay because he is not on the market.

Edit: Sorry Wahlstrom played 9 games, 0 points, -2.
exo2769 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 17 h 28
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
I think it's a tough sell and don't like the idea of Walhstrom. Wahlstrom's stock has fallen after having a so so year in the NCAA and a good but hardly great year in the AHL. He's far from a sure bet and could easily end up being only a 3rd line winger in his NHL career. Regarding Bode, if we didn't have Boqvist, Mitchell and Regula as prospects on the right side, I think the value of Bode in the trade would be much higher to the Hawks. Don't get me wrong, I like Bode but if he was a left hander, this trade would be more interesting for sure.

I think the Hawks need to pass not because of value on paper but because of gambling that Wahlstrom can really step it up and not sure he can. Bird in hand (Kubalik) is almost always better then gambling.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 19 h 30
#23
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: ChiHawk
I think it's a tough sell and don't like the idea of Walhstrom. Wahlstrom's stock has fallen after having a so so year in the NCAA and a good but hardly great year in the AHL. He's far from a sure bet and could easily end up being only a 3rd line winger in his NHL career. Regarding Bode, if we didn't have Boqvist, Mitchell and Regula as prospects on the right side, I think the value of Bode in the trade would be much higher to the Hawks. Don't get me wrong, I like Bode but if he was a left hander, this trade would be more interesting for sure.

I think the Hawks need to pass not because of value on paper but because of gambling that Wahlstrom can really step it up and not sure he can. Bird in hand (Kubalik) is almost always better then gambling.


Wilde is much more of a risk than wahlstrom IMO. If wilde can put it all together and clean up his decision making, he can be an elite offensive D. Time will tell.

Wahlstrom had a difficult D+1 season playing for an awful BC team, but the context matters for him after he left BC. He had 7 points in 10 games (AHL) as an 18 year old (regular season + playoffs) and he started this past season with 3 points in 4 games. He was called up due to eberle’s injury and was put on a line with josh bailey and brassard - in his 4 games he was the isles 2nd best generator of offense and had plenty of highlight real plays. Small sample size , but still. He had one bad turnover which led to a demotion to the 4th line with journeyman AHLer Cole bardreau and Ross johnston. He didn’t deserve the demotion or to be sent back down to Bridgeport, but once he did , it was confirmed that he was told by the coaching staff to not worry about points, to worry about his play away from the puck. The same thing was said to bellows the previous year which is why he only had 19 points in 72 games - it’s an extremely stupid thing to say to your offensive minded prospects, but there’s a reason most isles prospects don’t light it up in Bridgeport In their 1st season, and why most isles fans want lou to clean house..
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 19 h 32
#24
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,991
Mentions "j'aime": 2,842
Quoting: exo2769


Kubalik is the hawks future, I wouldn't trade him for more future pieces.
Wadejos123 et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 20 h 19
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: exo2769


So, I’m gonna try this from two sides of the same coin.

On one side, making this move would suggest an investment in the future instead of what’s effective now. Wahlstrom and Wilde would definitely provide size we could use and great potential. At the same time, everyone remembers how reading leddy to the islanders worked out for us right? None of the pieces we got back worked out, period. Value wise, I’d say it’s there. Kubalik, as many said about panarin, was a cheap piece brought in for a late pick. This trade would be a hell of a good return.

Now here’s the other side. As was the case with panarin, I really do feel if kubalik backs up his rookie year with a strong 2nd year, he may not actually be here long term. Suffice to say, this is just what I expect from stan. Do I think kuba is part of the hawks future? He certainly could be, but then again, so should panarin.

Overall, I definitely wouldn’t do this trade. There’s just plenty better you could get for kuba if the time ever came to trade him. Otherwise, I’d like for us to actually establish a new core.
exo2769 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage