SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rags other side

Créé par: Nikolay_Zherdev
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 24 sept. 2020
Publié: 24 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ik flames fans are untouchable on Elias bc of how much you guys gave up to get him and maybe this trade needs a 2021 1st in it but just wanted to show you guys what your team would look like with this trade
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 500 000 $
2800 000 $
2750 000 $
33 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
12 750 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $69 264 998 $0 $1 657 500 $12 235 002 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,283
Mentions "j'aime": 19,526
Take out Bennett and Flames still decline, you arent getting Lindholm with KK or Zib going the other way
flamesfan a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,187
Mentions "j'aime": 184
Thanks but no thanks
flamesfan a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 15
#3
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,885
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Overpayment by the rangers.
Nikolay_Zherdev et hero9154 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,837
Mentions "j'aime": 908
Quoting: Spanky227
Overpayment by the rangers.


Yup big time overpayment by the Rangers.
Nikolay_Zherdev a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 20
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Big thing with Lindholm is that he is elite on the PK and the only right handed shot on the PP. The value may not be crazy off but the holes that it opens up in special teams specifically would not be easy to overcome.
Nikolay_Zherdev a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 25
#6
Démarrer sujet
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,859
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Big thing with Lindholm is that he is elite on the PK and the only right handed shot on the PP. The value may not be crazy off but the holes that it opens up in special teams specifically would not be easy to overcome.


Thank you for actually having a legit comment, this is a very valid claim, I know an overpayment would be the only way you guys would move him, would it be better if I took out Bennett so you guys could still have him on the pk?
SmugTkachuk a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 29
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,283
Mentions "j'aime": 19,526
Quoting: Nikolay_Zherdev
Thank you for actually having a legit comment, this is a very valid claim, I know an overpayment would be the only way you guys would move him, would it be better if I took out Bennett so you guys could still have him on the pk?


Bennett is not a PK specialist, hes ok on it I guess. Lindholm is basically a slightly worse version of Marner but can take face offs, hit 30 goals and cost 1/3 in cap. He is far too important to the organization and team to move at all
SmugTkachuk a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 30
#8
Démarrer sujet
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,859
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Bennett is not a PK specialist, hes ok on it I guess. Lindholm is basically a slightly worse version of Marner but can take face offs, hit 30 goals and cost 1/3 in cap


Hahah good call, just thought he was a good defensive player and a body bruiser (when he needs to) so he would be able to take up some pk time
SmugTkachuk a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 59
#9
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,885
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Take out Bennett and Flames still decline, you arent getting Lindholm with KK or Zib going the other way


I was gonna get into how there are minimally 30 forwards that are better than him (there is more and I can list them)..

but quite frankly, lets look at the last two years of stats for Zibanejad and Lindholm

Lindholm
18-19: 81 GP: 27-51-78
19-20: 70 GP: 29-25-54 (over 82 games this pace would be 63 points)

Zibanejad
18-19: 82 GP: 30-44-74
19-20: 54 GP: 41-34-75 (over 82 games this pace is 113)

Yeah, lets trade a 113 point pace #1 center for a #2 center / wing whose best season was a 78 point pace). Also, LOL at him being worth the most recent 2nd overall pick.

2nd line center for a 2nd line winger, a PP QB 2nd line defenseman (he had more ATOI per game than Fox), a very good prospect in chytil that has two years in the NHL that JUST TURNED 21 this month), a decent prospect in Andersson who has been on fire since going back to the SHL (had 12 points in 15 games last year, and started this year off on fire (while having almost a 70% faceoff win rate). \

I don't want Bennett at all, but if you say you need a much better player for Lindholm, keep your 2c and we can offer sheet Cirelli for less tears of joy
24 sept. 2020 à 11 h 5
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,283
Mentions "j'aime": 19,526
Quoting: Spanky227
I was gonna get into how there are minimally 30 forwards that are better than him (there is more and I can list them)..

but quite frankly, lets look at the last two years of stats for Zibanejad and Lindholm

Lindholm
18-19: 81 GP: 27-51-78
19-20: 70 GP: 29-25-54 (over 82 games this pace would be 63 points)

Zibanejad
18-19: 82 GP: 30-44-74
19-20: 54 GP: 41-34-75 (over 82 games this pace is 113)

Yeah, lets trade a 113 point pace #1 center for a #2 center / wing whose best season was a 78 point pace). Also, LOL at him being worth the most recent 2nd overall pick.

2nd line center for a 2nd line winger, a PP QB 2nd line defenseman (he had more ATOI per game than Fox), a very good prospect in chytil that has two years in the NHL that JUST TURNED 21 this month), a decent prospect in Andersson who has been on fire since going back to the SHL (had 12 points in 15 games last year, and started this year off on fire (while having almost a 70% faceoff win rate). \

I don't want Bennett at all, but if you say you need a much better player for Lindholm, keep your 2c and we can offer sheet Cirelli for less tears of joy


Glad we agree, Flames simply arent trading Lindholm for anything but a massive overpayment. Which this is not.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage