This is a pretty big overpay by Chicago to move up 7 spots and simply not worth it. Why would Chicago add a 2nd as well?

I think we'd go for one or the other, not both

just curious, would you say 10OA is about equal to Strome in value? or what would you say is fair? I could see Hawks moving up for Askarov but I'm not sure, and he'll probably be gone by 17th.

Askarov won't make it past 13 to Carolina. Hawks would have to trade above that.

The 10OA is pretty close to equal for Strome since he just turned 23 and has (2) 50+ point seasons under his belt (this past abbreviated season prorated to a regular full season). Maybe a 2nd and Strome for the #10 and a 3rd rounder.

I would love for the jets to make this deal, but I don't really see if happening from the hawks side. They are in cap hell so maybe something like this happens but the value isn't there for them IMO, unless they really really want the guy at #10

Taking a closer look at this, I think you guys are right. The difference between the 10thOA and the 17OA is a 3rd round pick....I don't feel that Strome is worth a 1st rounder, but he is worth a 2nd rounder. I'd say throw Raslovic in the deal, but the Hawks don't have the $$ to sign him either. I think the only way to make this deal work is for extra draft picks or prospects....unless the Hawks need to get rid of some salary, which they do. So the Hawks give the 17th and either deHaan or Maatta for the Jets 10th OA + a 2nd rounder.