SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Petro

Créé par: ItWasIn
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 19 sept. 2020
Publié: 22 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1787 500 $
1787 500 $
33 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
2725 000 $
79 250 000 $
23 000 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Any team looking for a #3 C
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 934 999 $0 $457 500 $8 565 001 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
733 333 $733 333 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 sept. 2020 à 22 h 48
#1
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,290
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
I'd think getting a goalie would be priority one, no?
22 sept. 2020 à 22 h 52
#2
Démarrer sujet
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: krakowitz
I'd think getting a goalie would be priority one, no?


It probably is, realistically.

Lots of fans are split on it though, goaltending hasn't been an issue for the Flames in recent playoffs. They don't have a #1, but they've gotten solid goaltending in the playoffs.

The Flames have the ability to add Pietrangelo without performing significant roster surgery. If he has any interest at all, he needs to be the biggest priority. With Gio aging, you don't have a true #1D waiting in the wings. I like Andersson and Valimaki, but who knows if they will ever be able to shoulder the load of a #1D.
22 sept. 2020 à 23 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 105
Mentions "j'aime": 25
I like the idea in theory. That said, it won't happen for all the other factors people rarely address that go into how these tend to go. For starters, they won't exceed their internal cap ie. $7 million AAV set by Tkatchuk. I also am fairly confident CGY is on the bottom half of desired locations and we don't have a McDavid or a winning history to attract FA's so all in all I just don't think it's realistic.
22 sept. 2020 à 23 h 3
#4
Démarrer sujet
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: Different_Perspective_85
I like the idea in theory. That said, it won't happen for all the other factors people rarely address that go into how these tend to go. For starters, they won't exceed their internal cap ie. $7 million AAV set by Tkatchuk. I also am fairly confident CGY is on the bottom half of desired locations and we don't have a McDavid or a winning history to attract FA's so all in all I just don't think it's realistic.


If the Flames want Hall or Pietrangelo, they have to spend more than 7 on them. Who knows if that's the case. Maybe CGY isn't the most attractive place to play, but free agents typically always go to the team that pays them the most, if the Flames do it, they have a chance.
22 sept. 2020 à 23 h 13
#5
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,622
Mentions "j'aime": 12,352
Quoting: ItWasIn
If the Flames want Hall or Pietrangelo, they have to spend more than 7 on them. Who knows if that's the case. Maybe CGY isn't the most attractive place to play, but free agents typically always go to the team that pays them the most, if the Flames do it, they have a chance.


Is ownership willing to pay him the front loaded contract/signing bonuses or whatever it is Pietrangelo wants?
22 sept. 2020 à 23 h 17
#6
Démarrer sujet
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Is ownership willing to pay him the front loaded contract/signing bonuses or whatever it is Pietrangelo wants?


Probably not lol, but they did Tkachuk's deal with more bonuses than they have previously done.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2020 à 23 h 21
#7
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,622
Mentions "j'aime": 12,352
Quoting: ItWasIn
Probably not lol, but they did Tkachuk's deal with more bonuses than they have previously done.


From everything I've heard is that what Pietrangelo is wanting and Armstrong doesn't believe in contracts like that.
Idk, I figure he ends up staying in St. Louis but who knows, maybe he finds what he wants somewhere else.
22 sept. 2020 à 23 h 23
#8
Démarrer sujet
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
From everything I've heard is that what Pietrangelo is wanting and Armstrong doesn't believe in contracts like that.
Idk, I figure he ends up staying in St. Louis but who knows, maybe he finds what he wants somewhere else.


I don't think many owners will be signing off on bonus-laden deals this offseason, so Petro may have to settle if he wants to go back to STL
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2020 à 23 h 28
#9
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,622
Mentions "j'aime": 12,352
Quoting: ItWasIn
I don't think many owners will be signing off on bonus-laden deals this offseason, so Petro may have to settle if he wants to go back to STL


Yeah, maybe Toronto or Vegas could pull off what he's wanting but I'm not sure who else could or would want to.
22 sept. 2020 à 23 h 31
#10
Démarrer sujet
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Yeah, maybe Toronto or Vegas could pull off what he's wanting but I'm not sure who else could or would want to.


I'll probably end up being wrong here, but I don't think it makes sense for Toronto to sign him. They need to get rid of a ton of money just to make it work, then they need to hope they can get players on league min or close and hope they play way above their pay-grade. It also significantly limits their ability to sign Hyman or Andersen
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2020 à 23 h 34
#11
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,622
Mentions "j'aime": 12,352
Quoting: ItWasIn
I'll probably end up being wrong here, but I don't think it makes sense for Toronto to sign him. They need to get rid of a ton of money just to make it work, then they need to hope they can get players on league min or close and hope they play way above their pay-grade. It also significantly limits their ability to sign Hyman or Andersen


Oh I don't think it makes sense for the Leafs either,
I just don't doubt that they'll try to land the big fish of free agency.. Lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage