SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

leafs 2020-21 the cup team

Créé par: leafs_and_devils
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 22 sept. 2020
Publié: 22 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I know the fact that Pietrangelo being on the 3rd pairing seems crazy. But, Dermott and Rielly showed chemistry. This actually gives us 3 solid 2nd pairings, and gives Sandin a reliable partner for him to be able to develop and take chances. You could also swap haydn fleury and dermott if you wanted, but the goal is to have each pairing play 20 minutes a night, and then, come postseason, toss Muzzin and Pietrangelo out there for the last 3 minutes when we're in the lead, or Rielly and Pietrangelo or Sandin in the last 3 minutes when we need a goal.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 300 000 $
11 300 000 $
11 600 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
68 500 000 $
1800 000 $
11 000 000 $
1825 632 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Hayton, Barrett
  2. Kuemper, Darcy
Détails additionnels:
Kuemper's about as good as Andersen, but this trade allows the yotes to once again have a solid tandem, but they won't have to protect Freddie in the expansion draft because he is a UFA. And they would prefer Freddie's 1M salary to Kuemper's 3.5 this year and 5.5 next year.

The Goalie Swap is about equivalent, with Freddie having the edge. It could be Freddie for Kuemper and a 3rd. Kerfoot and Johnson and a 3rd gets you Hayton. So the 3rd's cancel out and you get this.
ARI
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. Johnsson, Andreas
  3. Kerfoot, Alexander
Détails additionnels:
These guys have already been payed their signing bonuses. This year they carry a 3.5M cap hit with 2.6M salary. Next year and 2022-23, they have 800,000 salary. Great for the Yotes.

The Coyotes are also rumored to be selling on their U-24 players. Hayton is a replacement for Kerfoot but has more skill and potential.
2.
TOR
  1. Fleury, Haydn [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
Haydn Fleury + 5th = 2021 First + Holl.
Engvall = 4th.
So, use Engvall to move up to a 3rd. (a 4th and a 5th could easily move up to a 3rd).
CAR
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Holl, Justin
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
The 2021 Draft isn't great past the top 10. We're looking at winning the cup. We're not going to get top 10. So it's fine to sell the 1st rounder and hope Dubas can work some 2nd - 5th round magic with his scouts to find another Johnson or Robertson.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de BUF
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $80 516 249 $0 $1 750 000 $983 751 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
825 632 $825 632 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 6
#1
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Love that cap space.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 7
#2
Dom6Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 581
Mentions "j'aime": 568
Kuemper for Andersen , Kerfoot , and Johnnson is already bad enough as the Coyotes have no need for Andersen , Gain cash which isnt the plan , and Kuemper is getting traded for good assets not spare parts BUT THEN YOU THROW IN BARRETT HAYTON LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO absolute Joke also "The Goalie Swap is about equivalent, with Freddie having the edge" No bud Kuemper is better than Andersen
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 9
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: Ritzy
Love that cap space.


thought'd it be fun to see if someone noticed and evidently they did. You could probably shift around the contracts of simmonds, spezza, and maroon, but they should be getting 2.65 all together.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 15
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,797
Mentions "j'aime": 564
These trades are not good man. Awful move for the Coyotes. Hayton is a young cost-controlled player, the EXACT kind they need. They're not moving him for spare parts, he's got top-6 potential.

I am not sure what the Carolina trade is. I don't think it fits what either team needs.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 17
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: DSZ
Kuemper for Andersen , Kerfoot , and Johnnson is already bad enough as the Coyotes have no need for Andersen , Gain cash which isnt the plan , and Kuemper is getting traded for good assets not spare parts BUT THEN YOU THROW IN BARRETT HAYTON LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO absolute Joke also "The Goalie Swap is about equivalent, with Freddie having the edge" No bud Kuemper is better than Andersen


Kerfoot and Johnson provide solid depth (kerfoot can play 3C ad johnson 3W or a fringe 2nd liner). The Yotes are selling their U-24s as I said, and Kuemper is still going to have to be paid big money. Andersen has the edge because he only has to be paid 1M which is good for a team like the Yotes. A 3rd line center and a fringe 2nd liner is a solid trade for a player who is going to develop into a 2C. By the time Tavares is 34, he'll become the 3C and Hayton the 2C behind AM34. The trade makes a lot more sense for both teams than it seems at first look.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 19
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: newballcoach
These trades are not good man. Awful move for the Coyotes. Hayton is a young cost-controlled player, the EXACT kind they need. They're not moving him for spare parts, he's got top-6 potential.

I am not sure what the Carolina trade is. I don't think it fits what either team needs.


See the reply to the other comment about the Yotes trade. As for the Canes, the canes have Bean coming out of the minors. They have 6 defenseman. Maybe take out holl and the 3rd, so the trade is Fleury for Engvall and the 1st. Pretty good value for someone who's going to be playing on the canes' 3rd pairing but has a much higher potential.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 27
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,797
Mentions "j'aime": 564
I mean, you can argue why you think your trade is good, but it isn't. The Coyotes want to remove cap space. You have them adding over 10 million between Andersen, Kefoot and Johnsson. Not to mention they don't have anywhere for Kerfoot or Johnsson to play. They have their top 3 centre's locked down (Hayton isn't one of them) and whatever Johnsson can provide them, VInnie Hinostra produces for less and might even be better. Your premise of Johnsson/Kerfoot = Hayton is nuts. A 3rd has so little value. So yes, it's a bad trade, no matter what rational you have. Whatever rumour you heard about the Coyotes selling off U24 players is likely wrong, considering those are the cheapest players on your roster.

General rule of thumb on here, when everyone tells you that you're wrong. You're probably wrong.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 32
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: leafs_RtheBest
Kerfoot and Johnson provide solid depth (kerfoot can play 3C ad johnson 3W or a fringe 2nd liner). The Yotes are selling their U-24s as I said, and Kuemper is still going to have to be paid big money. Andersen has the edge because he only has to be paid 1M which is good for a team like the Yotes. A 3rd line center and a fringe 2nd liner is a solid trade for a player who is going to develop into a 2C. By the time Tavares is 34, he'll become the 3C and Hayton the 2C behind AM34. The trade makes a lot more sense for both teams than it seems at first look.



I think you got that backwards. Coyotes have said they are willing to trade anyone over 25. Check hockey writers article sept 17. Dreger said they are listing to any trade of players over 25.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 33
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,299
Mentions "j'aime": 399
Canes decline because it makes the canes a worse team. The coyotes trade is hilarious. Some nerve to say Anderson has more value than Kuemper
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 36
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: leafs_RtheBest
Kerfoot and Johnson provide solid depth (kerfoot can play 3C ad johnson 3W or a fringe 2nd liner). The Yotes are selling their U-24s as I said, and Kuemper is still going to have to be paid big money. Andersen has the edge because he only has to be paid 1M which is good for a team like the Yotes. A 3rd line center and a fringe 2nd liner is a solid trade for a player who is going to develop into a 2C. By the time Tavares is 34, he'll become the 3C and Hayton the 2C behind AM34. The trade makes a lot more sense for both teams than it seems at first look.

Hayton was drafted 5 overall 2 years ago. He’s 20 years old. ZERO chance he gets treaded for kerfoot and Johnson.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 44
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,122
Mentions "j'aime": 25,035
Quoting: Leafsfan712
Hayton was drafted 5 overall 2 years ago. He’s 20 years old. ZERO chance he gets treaded for kerfoot and Johnson.


Welcome to CapFriendly!

Good comment!
Leafsfan712 et DSZ a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2020 à 13 h 59
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,122
Mentions "j'aime": 25,035
The Arizona trade is awful. Even adopting for the sake of argument your assumption that Kuemper and Andersen are equivalent in on-ice ability, why would Arizona trade two years of a #1 goalie for one year of an older #1 goalie and a "savings" of $2.5 million in cash? That's idiotic.

I can't imagine where you got the idea that the Coyotes would be trading away their young players, who are Arizona's only hope of being relevant in the next couple of seasons. Stepan, Hjalmarsson, Demers, Goligoski, Raanta, even Kessel yes, but not their anticipated core going forward.

I don't think Arizona will trade any of Schmaltz, Keller, Dvorak, Garland, Hayton, Chychrun, Soderstrom or Kuemper, but if they do, I would expect each to get the equivalent of a Kapanen return, i.e., a 2020 first-round draft pick.
22 sept. 2020 à 14 h 18
#13
Dom6Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 581
Mentions "j'aime": 568
Quoting: leafs_RtheBest
Kerfoot and Johnson provide solid depth (kerfoot can play 3C ad johnson 3W or a fringe 2nd liner). The Yotes are selling their U-24s as I said, and Kuemper is still going to have to be paid big money. Andersen has the edge because he only has to be paid 1M which is good for a team like the Yotes. A 3rd line center and a fringe 2nd liner is a solid trade for a player who is going to develop into a 2C. By the time Tavares is 34, he'll become the 3C and Hayton the 2C behind AM34. The trade makes a lot more sense for both teams than it seems at first look.


This isnt NHL 20 my dude Johnsson and Kerfoot does not get you the Coyotes Top Center Prospect and Hayton max potential is a great Top 6 Two way Center , Kuemper is a top 5 goalie in the league that has placed in Vezina Voting and Voted as the Coyotes ALLSTAR , Coyotes have no need for Andersen as they have Raanta and Hill
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage