SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bennet Trades

Créé par: GenXHockey
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 22 sept. 2020
Publié: 22 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just to clear up the confusion
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Bennett, Sam
Détails additionnels:
The trade that makes sense
CGY
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
Détails additionnels:
The trade that makes sense
2.
TOR
    Robinson, Buddy

    What leafs fans see
    CGY
    1. Nylander, William
    Détails additionnels:
    What leafs fans see
    3.
    TOR
    1. Tkachuk, Matthew
    Détails additionnels:
    What flames fans see
    CGY
    1. Engvall, Pierre
    Détails additionnels:
    What flames fans see
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de COL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de STL
    Logo de WPG
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    1781 500 000 $73 247 417 $0 $400 000 $8 252 583 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    821 667 $821 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    894 167 $894 167 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 sept. 2020 à 10 h 58
    #1
    DaBus
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2018
    Messages: 1,404
    Mentions "j'aime": 489
    Bennett is more valuable than Kerfoot imo. CGY should not be giving up a 3rd as well
    22 sept. 2020 à 10 h 59
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 9,527
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
    If Kerfoot is worth a 3rd, how does adding Bennett, the more valuable player, make sense lol
    Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 5
    #3
    Austerity
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 174
    Mentions "j'aime": 56
    Bennett is inconsistent (although clutch in the playoffs). If Calgary is looking for an upgrade and believes in Kerfoot's potential > Bennett's, and like the consistent cap hit of Kerfoot, they'll go for it.

    Leafs going for Bennett addresses the high-energy guy they need, and is more of a "gamble".
    GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 6
    #4
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: Alfie11
    If Kerfoot is worth a 3rd, how does adding Bennett, the more valuable player, make sense lol


    Bc the Leafs got the 15oa pick and a solid prospect for a 40 point winger lol
    Alfie11, GenXHockey et Austerity a aimé ceci.
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 11
    #5
    themostleaf33
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 2,138
    Mentions "j'aime": 482
    Bennet had a down season, but did bounce back in the playoffs. However the facts still suggest Kerfoot is the better player as Bennet does bring more grit but has yet to hit the 30 point mark while Kerfoot has hit the 40 point mark twice already. Fair trade imo
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 12
    #6
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    I'd say drop the pick. Bennett for Kerfoot is imo straight up a decent deal. CGY gets a bit more stable player on their own and TOR saves around a million in cap and receives an asset with a decent playoff history. Could be a win-win.
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 14
    #7
    torontos finest
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 9,546
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,169
    Quoting: Alfie11
    If Kerfoot is worth a 3rd, how does adding Bennett, the more valuable player, make sense lol


    I'm hard pressed to believe that Bennett is more valuable than Kerfoot.
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 16
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 37,919
    Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
    This made me Chuckle
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 17
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 21,155
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
    Quoting: Alfie11
    If Kerfoot is worth a 3rd, how does adding Bennett, the more valuable player, make sense lol


    Which is exactly why I made this post. Bennet is worth a 2nd, kerfoot I would say a 2nd and 3rd. Still plays a gritty game, not as much as Bennet but is skilled fast and produce.

    Fans from both sides over rate their players and underrate the other.
    Austerity a aimé ceci.
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 39
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 21,155
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
    Quoting: justaBoss
    I'd say drop the pick. Bennett for Kerfoot is imo straight up a decent deal. CGY gets a bit more stable player on their own and TOR saves around a million in cap and receives an asset with a decent playoff history. Could be a win-win.

    Kerfoot is more skilled faster/better skater and produces better. He is also a better C.

    I valued them at kerfoot 2nd + 3rd Bennet 2nd.

    Kerfoot is dangerously underrated on this site due to his lack of production this season. Moved to basically 3 teams. AVs Babs and then Keefe leafs.

    I like both teams. Kerfoot would not only be more productive but he would make the entire line more productive.

    Leafs would save a bit of cap and get a player with a bit more grit.

    Leafs don’t want to make the trade because our bottom 6 disappeared in the playoffs and shouldn’t give up the production.

    Flames don’t like the trade because he is a fan favourite well liked by the organization
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 48
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 21,155
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
    Quoting: mondo
    I'm hard pressed to believe that Bennett is more valuable than Kerfoot.

    He isn’t, that’s the point of this post.

    He’s also not worth a ton less like most leafs fans rate him.

    Bennet retained and a 2nd for Johnsson won’t fly.
    22 sept. 2020 à 11 h 57
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 21,155
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
    Quoting: Austerity
    Bennett is inconsistent (although clutch in the playoffs). If Calgary is looking for an upgrade and believes in Kerfoot's potential > Bennett's, and like the consistent cap hit of Kerfoot, they'll go for it.

    Leafs going for Bennett addresses the high-energy guy they need, and is more of a "gamble".


    I think kerfoot offers a lot of that too. He would fit in well with the flames and gets under the skin of players. Bennet offers the big hits... sometimes at inopportune moments lol.
    Austerity a aimé ceci.
    22 sept. 2020 à 12 h 3
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 21,155
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
    Quoting: justaBoss
    I'd say drop the pick. Bennett for Kerfoot is imo straight up a decent deal. CGY gets a bit more stable player on their own and TOR saves around a million in cap and receives an asset with a decent playoff history. Could be a win-win.

    Also wanted to mention that I did flip flop around on the pick between a third and a fourth.

    That just all depends on how you evaluate kerfoot and Bennet.

    I look at it as a 25+ point player for a 40+ point player who both bring something different to each team but also help to replace what the other did.
    22 sept. 2020 à 17 h 55
    #14
    Beanmachine
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 1,483
    Mentions "j'aime": 497
    Quoting: themostleaf33
    Bennet had a down season, but did bounce back in the playoffs. However the facts still suggest Kerfoot is the better player as Bennet does bring more grit but has yet to hit the 30 point mark while Kerfoot has hit the 40 point mark twice already. Fair trade imo


    I will keep the $1M in cap space and all of the intangibles that Bennett brings to the table over the 10 or so points a year upside I get with Kerfoot.
    22 sept. 2020 à 18 h 0
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 21,155
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
    Quoting: InTreWeTrust
    I will keep the $1M in cap space and all of the intangibles that Bennett brings to the table over the 10 or so points a year upside I get with Kerfoot.


    It’s about 15+ and creates more offence on the entire line.
    23 sept. 2020 à 21 h 44
    #16
    Austerity
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 174
    Mentions "j'aime": 56
    Kerfoot does have a digging and grindy ability as well, that much is certain. Bennett may still have unrealized potential (I'm still holding out to some extent), but it's the lower cap hit of Bennett and his ability to go up and down the lineup that'd be the kicker for me.

    Like, Kerfoot can play on lines 2 or 3. But I'd just feel bad if I had to throw Kerfoot on the 4th line, whereas I could totally throw Bennett on an energy line and it'd be A-Ok.
    GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage