SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

AP 27 with Nylander flip

Créé par: jloose92
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 21 sept. 2020
Publié: 21 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 700 000 $
21 700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 727 272 $
1700 000 $
32 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
1700 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Drysdale, Jamie
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $80 967 189 $0 $0 $532 811 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
8 727 272 $8 727 272 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 5
#1
DaBus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,404
Mentions "j'aime": 489
Hawks not giving up 2nd for Johnsson. I'd give up a 3rd
jloose92 a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 8
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Not that disagree with the concept of the trades and signing, but wouldn't the Ducks be much better off spending 7m on UFA and keeping their very high first rounder than trading for four years of Nylander.
That is the competition the Leafs and all teams have when trying to dump cap, and not wanting cap back in return.

I won't even comment on the impracticality of a 20 man roster....or even a 21 man roster
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 9
#3
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: DaBus
Hawks not giving up 2nd for Johnsson. I'd give up a 3rd


Let someone else give up a third. Johnsson is not worth his cap hit.
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 15
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,406
Mentions "j'aime": 319
Quoting: palhal
Not that disagree with the concept of the trades and signing, but wouldn't the Ducks be much better off spending 7m on UFA and keeping their very high first rounder than trading for four years of Nylander.
That is the competition the Leafs and all teams have when trying to dump cap, and not wanting cap back in return.

I won't even comment on the impracticality of a 20 man roster....or even a 21 man roster


Assuming the trades happened I like the signings except for Fast. Take him out and sign Thornton to as low as he'll go and add kivalme, Petan and Lily as depth. Dermott isn't getting 1.7 either. I'd give him another less then 1 mill contract to prove he's NHL ready.
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 16
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Nylander isn't returning you the #6 pick, Noway Anaheim does this. And signing Pietrangelo and drafting Drysdale makes no sense as Drysdale will easily be a top pairing RD and you basically block him for 7 years with Pietrangelo. Even on the 2nd pairing you'd be wasting his talent there.
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,797
Mentions "j'aime": 564
Toronto is taking a loss in the Anaheim trade. With the #6 pick you would hope to draft a player as good as Nylander down the road. If you sign Pietro that's an all-in move, so why move for a draft pick there. You don't need to cut salary so drastically.
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 36
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 70
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: palhal
Not that disagree with the concept of the trades and signing, but wouldn't the Ducks be much better off spending 7m on UFA and keeping their very high first rounder than trading for four years of Nylander.
That is the competition the Leafs and all teams have when trying to dump cap, and not wanting cap back in return.

I won't even comment on the impracticality of a 20 man roster....or even a 21 man roster


Maybe. What UFA at 7mil would provide similar value? maybe Hall, Dadnov, Hoffman?
All 3 will decline. The upside to Nylander is that he will continue to get better and can play center.

The next 3 picks are NJD, Buff, Minny. Maybe one of those are better suited.
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 37
#8
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
6OA > Nylander
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 38
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 70
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: newballcoach
Toronto is taking a loss in the Anaheim trade. With the #6 pick you would hope to draft a player as good as Nylander down the road. If you sign Pietro that's an all-in move, so why move for a draft pick there. You don't need to cut salary so drastically.


Agreed, although this draft is pretty deep.
The other option is subtracting depth (Johnsson, Kerfoot, Holl).
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 39
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 70
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
6OA > Nylander


It's close
21 sept. 2020 à 10 h 58
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,797
Mentions "j'aime": 564
Quoting: jloose92
It's close


Absolutely disagree. Your 6th overall pick has NO GUARANTEE to ever play an NHL game. Sure. everyone is hyped about prospects but that happens consistently. Even if they do, it won't be likely for another 2-3 seasons at earliest. The Leafs are contending RIGHT NOW. They don't need a player (who is unlikely to ever be better than Nylander) who will help them in 3-4 seasons. They need an impact player right now, which is what Nylander is.

When do teams looking to contend for championships dump one of their best players for a draft pick? How often is that going to help them? And do we forget that Kapanen just got a package that included a prospect, along with the #15 pick. If he's worth more than #15, how is Nylander not worth 6?
21 sept. 2020 à 11 h 18
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
hawks decline. Hawks view Johnson as a cap dump. We can get similar production out of our ELC's, that johnson would be blocking by coming to chicago.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage