Modifié 26 sept. 2020 à 2 h 42
Quoting: A_K
Where are you seeing 7x7.7? I saw Rutherford report 7.7 aav but that could be 8 years if the Blues are trying to keep the AAV down. So you'd be looking at 7x8.8 as the equivalent, not 5x7.7, regardless of how front loaded it is.
Also, the Blues offered that and talks broke off, so it isnt like that's what it takes to get him. It didn't even return a counter from his side.
Not my fault honey, dont take it on me.....
Same as i responded to Rja, seems like current course of Pietrangelo situation pushed you guys over the edge....even the reasonable ones from your fanbase ( as you and Rja for sure were of the rare ones who didnt wave around how Pietrangelo will stay cause hes married to the St.Louis girl and such ) and now you are acting in vain with arguments of TML homers
Told to myself back in February i wont try to explain logic anymore to some »bots from twitter« here that learned hockey from NHL 2018 but in your case i think I need to make an exception cause of the above said.
1) If it was 8 x 7,7M then i think its blatantly impudent from Armstrong to came up with somethin like that toward one of Top10 Ds in the League which are commanding 10+M at that point of their career, cause that would be literally pushing him to leave 2,8M on the table
2) So it was 7 x 7,7M or even 6 x 7,7M, both lowballing the player
My take in this simulation is 6 x 8,5M which is again completely on the spot especially with front-loading
Contract breakdown explanation
8 x 10,5M
7 x 9,6M
6 x 8,6M
5 x 7,6M
So even cause i should play on his Home-town discount to be asked for, i didnt , opposed to Armstrong with his version of "you-were-allowed-to-marry-one-of-our-girls" discount