Why do you want brandon sutter. There's playes in the minors much cheaper than him that are better than him.

that doesn't help the yotes, they need to clear cap, not take back someone who needs a contract and retain salary.

Nashville rejects. Sissons is better, and has a long term contract.

Can't see Arizona retaining more than 25% but maybe they can retain 50 if you take Hossa. He also won't be that cheap to acquire, think Alec Martinez. Also no chance Nashville considers that. Sissons is better, cheaper, and signed for 6 more seasons.



To be fair Hjalmarsson is only owed 2M so a 50% ret costs Arizona 1M

very true, but I feel they can find a suitor to get it all off the books. Also, I guarantee, reimer and kuemper swap (not 1 for 1) because reimer is only owed 850k

Doubt that, they will sell Kuemper for almost purely futures and run Raanta/Hill as their tandem. They won't want to take a goalie back after giving Hill a 1-way deal.

maybe they also move raanta. The organization is really in big trouble.

Moving Raanta is not a great idea, he's only owed 2M and is reliable. Allows Hill to develop more. Maybe a swap of him and Riemer makes sense but I can't seem them doing a complete shuffle on their goalies

Sutter is worse than engvall

VAN is not retaining salary.