SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bobber goes Boom Boom

Créé par: Ducks
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 15 sept. 2020
Publié: 15 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 800 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Lundmark, Simon [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Getzlaf, Ryan (4 125 000 $ retained)
2.
ANA
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (COL)
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
4.
ANA
  1. Lundkvist, Nils [Liste de réserve]
5.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de WPG
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 531 249 $0 $982 500 $14 968 751 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
745 000 $745 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 11
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,070
That sure is tempting for the Avs...
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 16
#2
Démarrer sujet
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 659
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: Foppa21
That sure is tempting for the Avs...


We’ll even retain half his contract to get it done!
ArakinSkywalker a aimé ceci.
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 26
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Foppa21
That sure is tempting for the Avs...


not the 2020 pick though, Timmins and a 2021 seems like a value they can live with.

Rackell only has 2 years left on his contract. Solid target for the Avs though. Deep draft with some good Dman available in that Avs pick range. Keep that 2020 pick espeically if you are able to draft william wallinder. He will be able to join the Avs system sooner which makes moving Timmins easier to handle knowing you have an AHL available kid in the mix right now.
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 32
#4
Démarrer sujet
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 659
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: coga16
not the 2020 pick though, Timmins and a 2021 seems like a value they can live with.

Rackell only has 2 years left on his contract. Solid target for the Avs though. Deep draft with some good Dman available in that Avs pick range. Keep that 2020 pick espeically if you are able to draft william wallinder. He will be able to join the Avs system sooner which makes moving Timmins easier to handle knowing you have an AHL available kid in the mix right now.


2021 works for me. Timmins is the real target for us. 1st is to keep value solid.
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 35
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Ducks
2021 works for me. Timmins is the real target for us. 1st is to keep value solid.


2021 and Timmins would hurt but its a price I think they can live with...especially after the 2020 draft if they know they got a Dman in the fold with pick.
Personally I woluld hope avs go after a younger more term guy if they would part Timmins in a trade.
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Getzlaf says no
No to the Lindholm trade
Not sure why we’d want 9 million dollar subban
Colorado and Toronto ones aren’t horrible
DucksFan55 a aimé ceci.
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 44
#7
Démarrer sujet
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 659
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: Arlotti47
Getzlaf says no
No to the Lindholm trade
Not sure why we’d want 9 million dollar subban
Colorado and Toronto ones aren’t horrible


Idk bout that
That’s the best well get for him
He’s better than gudbranson
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 46
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: Ducks
Idk bout that
That’s the best well get for him
He’s better than gudbranson


We could get a much better package for Lindholm rather than a singular prospect. I’d rather get a B-ish prospect a pick and scoring help than just one prospect we don’t know will spark or not.

Getlzaf publicly stated he doesn’t want to leave the Ducks

I’d rather have Gudbranson because it saves us like 6 mil and Guddy was actual decent when he played with us.
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 47
#9
Démarrer sujet
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 659
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: Arlotti47
We could get a much better package for Lindholm rather than a singular prospect. I’d rather get a B-ish prospect a pick and scoring help than just one prospect we don’t know will spark or not.

Getlzaf publicly stated he doesn’t want to leave the Ducks

I’d rather have Gudbranson because it saves us like 6 mil and Guddy was actual decent when he played with us.


Give me a mock deal for Lindholm to Rangers
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 49
#10
Iceman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 749
Mentions "j'aime": 84
Not too shabby. Here are my thoughts on all the trades. The Getzlaf trade is pretty good, but it doesn’t happen. Getzlaf is gonna finish out his current contract as a Duck and possibly his career as well. The Rakell trade I’d say is fair value for both sides. The Avs are looking for another winger for the top 6 and Rakell more than fits the bill at a team friendly cap hit. The Ducks are looking for a RD and Timmins IMO no longer has a spot in Colorado, but he also might be too good for the AHL at this point. Another 1st is also nice. Probably the most realistic trade here. The Manson trade is definitely interesting because I do agree that the Ducks could get a 1st for him, I just don’t know if it would necessarily be this year’s 15th overall pick. Also, the Ducks might be able to get a solid prospect out of that trade as well. The Lindholm trade is probably the one I have the most issues with. The Rangers are not gonna be trading Nils Lundkvist anytime soon and the Ducks can also get more for Lindholm. If the Rangers are getting Lindholm, then we’re getting DeAngelo, a 1st, and maybe a prospect like Robertson or Reunanen or Pajuniemi. The Gudbranson for Subban trade might be the hardest one to analyze because I feel that more pieces would be part of a trade like this. I feel that the Devils could probably get a good prospect out of us just because of the name involved here, but I also feel that the Ducks can get one of the Devils later 1sts because of the cap coming our way if no salary is retained on their part and on top of that, we may be able to make them take on someone like David Backes as well. This trade kinda screams buyer and seller all at the same time to me and I don’t really know how something like that would work. Either way, it definitely wouldn’t be Subban for Gudbranson one for one especially if Subban can rediscover his game. The Granlund signing is decent and he’d be a nice fit for a team like the Ducks, but I’d probably only sign him for 2-3 years and maybe lower the amount by about 300k. Also, I feel that the Ducks sign another RD UFA. Hakanpaa is not that good and you definitely don’t want him in your top 4. Bringing back Sami Vatanen would not be out of the realm of possibility or maybe someone like Dylan DeMelo wouldn’t be a bad option. Overall you’ve got the right mindset about things, but some of the trades may just have to be touched up a bit.
DucksFan55 a aimé ceci.
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 50
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: Ducks
Give me a mock deal for Lindholm to Rangers


Deangelo
Kravtsov
Rangers 2nd

Or

Strome
Hajek
Car 1st
15 sept. 2020 à 17 h 54
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 115
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Quoting: Arlotti47
Getzlaf says no
No to the Lindholm trade
Not sure why we’d want 9 million dollar subban
Colorado and Toronto ones aren’t horrible


What he said happy^ they won't move Getzlaf, not enough for Lindholm, and I'd rather sign a Vatanen/Shattenkirk/etc. and keep Guddy for 1 more year.
Arlotti47 et Ducks a aimé ceci.
15 sept. 2020 à 18 h 23
#13
Démarrer sujet
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 659
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: Arlotti47
Deangelo
Kravtsov
Rangers 2nd

Or

Strome
Hajek
Car 1st


Strome and Hajek suck. That first is late. You’d rather spare parts over a top prospect right defenseman?
15 sept. 2020 à 18 h 25
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: Ducks
Strome and Hajek suck. That first is late. You’d rather spare parts over a top prospect right defenseman?


I wouldn’t say Strome is a spare part. But I just don’t think we should invest in a RHD prospect we don’t know enough about yet. Hence the reason I also want to stay away from Drysdale
15 sept. 2020 à 18 h 39
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,070
Quoting: coga16
2021 and Timmins would hurt but its a price I think they can live with...especially after the 2020 draft if they know they got a Dman in the fold with pick.
Personally I woluld hope avs go after a younger more term guy if they would part Timmins in a trade.


@Ducks @coga16 Agreed. 2021 1st would be more desirable, but I think you take a long look at that deal if you're Joe.
Ducks a aimé ceci.
15 sept. 2020 à 18 h 56
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 129
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Ducks
Strome and Hajek suck. That first is late. You’d rather spare parts over a top prospect right defenseman?


yeah as a Rangers fan I would probably rather do both of those deals than give up Nils right now. If the Ducks would do Strome + CAR 1st + Hajek I bet it would be done as soon as the Rangers can get a replacement for Strome, and **** they might not even wait that long. The DeAngelo + Krav + 2nd (2021 bc NYR doesn't have a 2nd this year, thank you for Adam Fox Carolina) is harder and maybe I'd do Nils instead but if we still have Nils Tony is completely expendable and we have the winger depth for Krav to be expendable.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage