SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Overhaul

Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 12 sept. 2020
Publié: 14 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I'm curious if the Flames go in a completely different direction as a result of the economic uncertainty of the league as a result of COVID (no gate based revenue), the ownership group has the majority of their income/investments in an industry that's been decimated in recent years in addition to they are have made a massive investment being put toward a new arena. Does it make sense to embrace a rebuild, lower payroll, maximize on the trade value of some of our core that have proven they don't have what it takes to make it out of the first round (paying to the cap for mediocre results isn't sitting well with anyone) and it would allow them to develop younger players, restock their prospect pool and give themselves a chance to reopen their "competitive/contender window" at the same times as fans can safely return and the new arena is completed. Let me know where I am of and what adjustments would need to be made but conceptually I think this is the path the Flames should pursue IMHO
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
22 850 000 $
3950 000 $
2775 000 $
2825 000 $
11 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 850 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2850 000 $
21 750 000 $
23 000 000 $
43 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Ryan, Derek (1 250 000 $ retained)
3.
CGY
  1. Farabee, Joel
  2. Gostisbehere, Shayne
  3. Patrick, Nolan [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de CGY
Logo de PHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de MIN
Logo de CGY
Logo de PHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de MIN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $65 458 333 $0 $2 870 000 $16 041 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 sept. 2020 à 23 h 21
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
So the Sabres are losing one of the best prospects in hockey, a future top pairing RD, a 2021 first? This definitely won’t happen.
14 sept. 2020 à 23 h 35
#2
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Sabres923
So the Sabres are losing one of the best prospects in hockey, a future top pairing RD, a 2021 first? This definitely won’t happen.


All for, a defenseman who struggles defensively and is one dimensional, a not good two-way centreman, AHL staple, decent top 6 d.....
Sabres923 a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2020 à 23 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,357
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Gaudreau to Philly just doesn't make sense. If the have to send all roster players to get him I don't see it happening it makes the teams depth worse
14 sept. 2020 à 23 h 48
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
All for, a defenseman who struggles defensively and is one dimensional, a not good two-way centreman, AHL staple, decent top 6 d.....


Why are you constantly under the impression that Hanifin is defensively inept? He is not, he is a strong skating 2-way defender. Monahan also has a good 2-way game IQ, his issue is like your Ryan Strome, lack of foot speed. That and the 3 other centers on his team specialize in being shut down centers (Lindholm included).

To clarify I am not arguing the value of the trade because Buffalo obviously declines.
14 sept. 2020 à 23 h 50
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
It actually makes a lot of sense, they have a very high chance of being able to resign him, he drastically improves their power play and top 6, and he's on a very affordable contract for 2 years.
14 sept. 2020 à 23 h 51
#6
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,991
Mentions "j'aime": 2,842
I don't know if it's in the best interest of the team/league to do this. From a marketing standpoint, a lot of people are still stuck at home with nothing to do or working from home. I think the NHL is going to try to take advantage of that with day games on weekdays. Viewership may go up, and this could be a chance for the league to gain more notoriety. Why not get the best possible product on the ice to attract more fans? Sure the owners might lose some millions from their billions, but what they lose now, they could make double or triple when we go back to 'normal'.

Anywho, these trades probably aren't plausible, Cozens isn't going anywhere and neither is Farabee.
14 sept. 2020 à 23 h 52
#7
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Why are you constantly under the impression that Hanifin is defensively inept? He is not, he is a strong skating 2-way defender. Monahan also has a good 2-way game IQ, his issue is like your Ryan Strome, lack of foot speed. That and the 3 other centers on his team specialize in being shut down centers (Lindholm included).

To clarify I am not arguing the value of the trade because Buffalo obviously declines.


I'm just not sold on his defensive abilities. His positioning and all that. Looks like he doesn't really know how to defend at times. Maybe I'm just watching him at inconvenient times. Monahan is not great defensively and a 1C that's kinda concerning...
15 sept. 2020 à 0 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 604
Mentions "j'aime": 119
i like the idea and personally I think this is exactly what the flames should be doing. the time is now to maximize the profit on our core players who can make huge impacts on contender teams in the last few years of their cheap contracts. unfortunately the gm and the scouts in calgary are not good enough to find players that could come in and compliment the core that we currently have. we have been relying on declining veterans and fringe NHL UFA signings to fill the back end of our roster because our prospects havent turned out to be good enough to make an impact for the last 4-5 seasons. Unfortunately unless treliving makes a pretty big splash here this offseason or during the next season the flames are destined to disappoint and eventually be forced into a rebuild when giordano retires and gaudreau and Monahan leave. Im not too sure about the trades proposed but a rebuild is in Calgary's destiny if we continue on the path we are on. I sincerely hope our management sees it this way otherwise we are gonna lose a lot of assets in a couple years and get little to no return. Heres to hoping cause im sick of the mediocrity
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage