Minnesota has no need for Mete and no reason to do this.

I agree, no need for Kulikov, just roll Mete to the right side 3D spot.

Danault better be a sign and trade, I don't see him staying in Winnipeg, it's cold AF there lol

Faksa's having a good playoffs, i think he commands more than Kulak.

There is virtually no chance Winnipeg moves 10OA for Danault.

The deal is made if Brodin is traded

Mete is worth at least as much as Greenway, and the deal happens if Brodin is gone

Danault's Québécois lol, he knows winter it's not like he's from Texas

Kulak also had insane playoffs and would do wonders with Klingberg

Wouldn't be surprising after giving up first round picks for rentals 2C two years in a row, especially since Danault is better than both and comes extended

There's a big difference between a first after the 20th pick and the 10OA. Easy no from Winnipeg , Danault isn't worth anywhere close to a high 1st.

not saying they aren't equal in value.

I'm saying, why sign Kulikov when you have Mete?

Quebec and Manitoba are very different winters.... Montreal's average low, -12 (excluding windchill) Winnipeg -18 (excluding windchill)... winnipeg is terrible, and during the summer, the black fly's eat you alive.

Faksa would sign for less in Dallas (better state tax than Quebec). and on LD, they have Lindell, Oleksiak, Shea and Harley in the system... Kulak doesn't have much value for them.

If the Wild move Brodin and come your way, they will be looking at Romanov. Not saying they get him, but I think that’s where Minnesota sees a deal. I also think there is a discussion for both if Brodin moves.

Brodin isn't coming to MTL

Whether you like it or not, he is

Understood. I think if the Wild move Brodin, Montreal could expect a call from the Wild regarding Romanov and Mete.

Possible, but the Habs wouldn't do it. There's even less chance now since Edmundson

Mete isn't a Brodin replacement.



Danault is worth nowhere near a top 10 or even 15 pick.

Danault is worth nowhere near a top 10 or even 15 pick.[/quote]

I mean Kapanen just got the Leafs 15th overall and a prospect, Danault just came 6th in Selke voting, him being extended is worth quite a bit more then Kapanen, not hard to do the math

I mean Kapanen just got the Leafs 15th overall and a prospect, Danault just came 6th in Selke voting, him being extended is worth quite a bit more then Kapanen, not hard to do the math[/quote]

Lol I just added him to ignore list

DAL declines that. No need for Kulak.

Lol I just added him to ignore list[/quote]

You added me to your ignore list because you have a broken concept of Danault's trade value based on one of the worst overpayments in recent memory by the Penguins GM? lmao

Yeah yeah, he definitely does

We are not trading Danault - KK and Suzuki are promising right now, but they are not ready to carry the load that would be left behind Danault. They will sign him longterm.

We don’t really need any LHD. Is Kulak any good? Honest question. Haven’t paid much attention to him

Putting these fairly unneeded statistics aside, Faksa has been invaluable for the Stars playoff run.

He's been very impressive thus far and there's virtually no reason to move the guy.

Honestly yeah, he's not flashy but moves the puck well. He has been fantastic next to Petry