SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Getting some draft picks backConnor help

Créé par: Tryxii
Équipe: 2020-21 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 10 sept. 2020
Publié: 10 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
First season plan I've made, try to go easy
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 500 000 $
31 750 000 $
13 150 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1850 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Tuch, Alex
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (COL)
OTT
  1. Neal, James
Détails additionnels:
35% retained
3.
EDM
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Russell, Kris
Détails additionnels:
25% retained
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de NJD
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de COL
Logo de LAK
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 701 032 $341 534 $862 500 $7 798 968 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
915 000 $915 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 31
#1
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Sorry but leafs need cap space. Not taking cap dumps. I would look at LA Ottawa or Detroit. Be prepared to pay much more.
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 34
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Not even with retained? Worth a shot at least lol
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
What you did here is give Neal away which understood his contract destroys value whatever but subtracted 20-25 goals from the team to hopefully replace with tuch at the cost of nurse did you really come out ahead with that? I get why people want to move Neal but if you only focus on his contract your going to get lead towards making a costly mistake in the bigger picture. Give him one more year see what he can do with a healthy season burn another year of term then consider the options. Around here people will only look at his contract and foolishly think deserve high end picks to be included. (Not a chance will get)
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 39
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,534
Mentions "j'aime": 1,238
You would need to retain 2.75M for OTT to accept that offer
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 47
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Timmah007
What you did here is give Neal away which understood his contract destroys value whatever but subtracted 20-25 goals from the team to hopefully replace with tuch at the cost of nurse did you really come out ahead with that? I get why people want to move Neal but if you only focus on his contract your going to get lead towards making a costly mistake in the bigger picture. Give him one more year see what he can do with a healthy season burn another year of term then consider the options. Around here people will only look at his contract and foolishly think deserve high end picks to be included. (Not a chance will get)


The reasoning behind Neal is that while I would want to give him one more year, this past season he scored 19 goals very quickly (good) and then dropped off a cliff in the second half while also getting PP1 time (not good). In terms of picks, is a 4th really that high? It's quite literally middle of the pack, which is a coinflip NHL player at best. Not trying to argue, just giving my reasoning
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 48
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: PLDGEY
You would need to retain 2.75M for OTT to accept that offer


Which EDM could do (up to a certain point), cap wise it's smarter to buy him out at that point but might as well get something for him
10 sept. 2020 à 23 h 22
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,640
Mentions "j'aime": 2,513
Quoting: Tryxii
The reasoning behind Neal is that while I would want to give him one more year, this past season he scored 19 goals very quickly (good) and then dropped off a cliff in the second half while also getting PP1 time (not good). In terms of picks, is a 4th really that high? It's quite literally middle of the pack, which is a coinflip NHL player at best. Not trying to argue, just giving my reasoning


You mean he dropped off because he was playing with a bad foot injury? in that case, yes you are right.
Timmah007 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 23 h 29
#8
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
Vegas has enough LD, they're not moving Tuch unless it's an overpay and Nurse isn't that.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 23 h 49
#9
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,628
Mentions "j'aime": 12,354
Quoting: NickC1988
Vegas has enough LD, they're not moving Tuch unless it's an overpay and Nurse isn't that.


Vegas is also sending what will likely be an early 2nd round pick, are D considered so much more valuable that a team should lose 4 years of cost certainty and add a 2nd round pick?!.. I just don't see it myself, that'd be a dumb move by Vegas imo.
11 sept. 2020 à 0 h 0
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: Tryxii
The reasoning behind Neal is that while I would want to give him one more year, this past season he scored 19 goals very quickly (good) and then dropped off a cliff in the second half while also getting PP1 time (not good). In terms of picks, is a 4th really that high? It's quite literally middle of the pack, which is a coinflip NHL player at best. Not trying to argue, just giving my reasoning

I’m not against trading nurse but it would be to add to teams goal total but work around Neal for another year. The 20-25 goals even if all on pp isn’t production that should be completely dismissed when “dumping” his contract. Needs to be replaced and in this case your adding tuch to the offence will he not only replace that but justify the loss of nurse? I think right now is a more complicated time to move Neal than gets considered. “Dumping” Neal and using cap in free agency is different story because it didn’t cost nurse to realistically just replace subtracted offence. I hope this made sense.
11 sept. 2020 à 0 h 22
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Timmah007
I’m not against trading nurse but it would be to add to teams goal total but work around Neal for another year. The 20-25 goals even if all on pp isn’t production that should be completely dismissed when “dumping” his contract. Needs to be replaced and in this case your adding tuch to the offence will he not only replace that but justify the loss of nurse? I think right now is a more complicated time to move Neal than gets considered. “Dumping” Neal and using cap in free agency is different story because it didn’t cost nurse to realistically just replace subtracted offence. I hope this made sense.


Yeah I get that, my idea came mostly from the fact that someone from the farm could hopefully step up to take his place, and Vegas' playstyle fits his pretty well. Problem is, VGK already has a bunch of D men like Nurse- Top 4ish players with maybe top pair upside

Getting rid of Neal will not be easy, and if Holland can get it done in a smart way, he's a much better GM than I
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage