SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2020-21 Flames

Créé par: LittleBroDougie
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 10 sept. 2020
Publié: 10 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
1800 000 $
44 250 000 $
31 985 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Anderson, Josh [Droits de RFA]
CBJ
  1. Ruzicka, Adam
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de WPG
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $73 036 666 $0 $457 500 $8 463 334 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
1 985 000 $1 985 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 sept. 2020 à 17 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,247
Mentions "j'aime": 7,114
Arvidsson had a 31 goal, 61 point season the year before he signed a 6 year, $4.25m contract.

Mangiapane had a 17 goal, 32 point season last year and now he gets a 6 year, $4.5m contract?

I get the idea of wanting to lock him up long-term, but I still think that this is an overpay for him -- he just hasn't done enough yet.
10 sept. 2020 à 17 h 20
#2
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,612
Mentions "j'aime": 1,141
Markstrom will probably ask and get much more.
10 sept. 2020 à 17 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 192
Mentions "j'aime": 46
I like the idea a lot. But these contracts are insane and not anywhere close to reality. Markstrom is getting nothing less than 6 million, Mangiapane is getting nothing more than 3 million.

I really disagree with spending the little bit of flexibility we have on a goalie. Our goaltending, aside from one game, was outstanding in the playoffs. Our skaters need the upgrading.
10 sept. 2020 à 17 h 32
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,704
Mentions "j'aime": 888
Columbus passes. Not nearly enough for Anderson. Bidding starts at a 2nd-rounder, which is how much he's likely to cost on an offer sheet, and given the league-wide interest, it's probably a higher price than that.
10 sept. 2020 à 18 h 15
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
You want to pay Mangiapane what?! Bennett signed for 1.95 with better numbers coming out of his ELC and you want to pay 4.5?! That is awful.
Connys_Cucks a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2020 à 8 h 1
#6
Démarrer sujet
LittleBroDougie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 112
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Thanks for the comments guys! I'm happy to answer them.

Quoting: villenash
Arvidsson had a 31 goal, 61 point season the year before he signed a 6 year, $4.25m contract.

Mangiapane had a 17 goal, 32 point season last year and now he gets a 6 year, $4.5m contract?

I get the idea of wanting to lock him up long-term, but I still think that this is an overpay for him -- he just hasn't done enough yet.


Quoting: SmugTkachuk
You want to pay Mangiapane what?! Bennett signed for 1.95 with better numbers coming out of his ELC and you want to pay 4.5?! That is awful.


He has been the Flames leader in advanced metrics two year in a row. He was also on an ~30goal/82game pace once Frolik was traded and he was boosted to top-6. People gawked at the Lindholm deal and that has turned into one of the best contracts in the league. I can see Mang performing at the same level next year along two highly talented players.

Quoting: Missouri
Markstrom will probably ask and get much more.


I don't disagree but it's not out of the realm of possibility. He gets stability for quite a few years and a good team in front of him over the length of his contract.

Quoting: benjgc
Columbus passes. Not nearly enough for Anderson. Bidding starts at a 2nd-rounder, which is how much he's likely to cost on an offer sheet, and given the league-wide interest, it's probably a higher price than that.


Deal, if it's a second straight up. Anything more is an overpay for a guy with injury history and one good year. And I love Anderson - I've been following him for years.

Quoting: ChuckyCheese
I like the idea a lot. But these contracts are insane and not anywhere close to reality. Markstrom is getting nothing less than 6 million, Mangiapane is getting nothing more than 3 million.

I really disagree with spending the little bit of flexibility we have on a goalie. Our goaltending, aside from one game, was outstanding in the playoffs. Our skaters need the upgrading.


See above for Mang - I believe it will pay off in the next year or two just like Lindholm and Andersson. Overpay for a year to get 5 years at a great deal.

As for goaltending, Talbot was sensational but crumbled when it mattered which seems to be backed by his history. BSD appears to be a front half guy and falls off in the second half of the season due to injury or complacency, or both (2 years in a row now). Sign a good goaltender for a while now to mind the crease and guide Wolf/Parsons/whoever once they're ready.
Missouri a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2020 à 8 h 47
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,247
Mentions "j'aime": 7,114
Quoting: LittleBroDougie
He has been the Flames leader in advanced metrics two year in a row. He was also on an ~30goal/82game pace once Frolik was traded and he was boosted to top-6. People gawked at the Lindholm deal and that has turned into one of the best contracts in the league. I can see Mang performing at the same level next year along two highly talented players.


Ater Frolik was traded this past season, he only played ~20 games. He played better in an expanded role, but that is an extremely small sample size to justify that contract.
11 sept. 2020 à 10 h 2
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: LittleBroDougie
He has been the Flames leader in advanced metrics two year in a row. He was also on an ~30goal/82game pace once Frolik was traded and he was boosted to top-6. People gawked at the Lindholm deal and that has turned into one of the best contracts in the league. I can see Mang performing at the same level next year along two highly talented players.


Mangiapane has great advanced stats and in a vacuum that is wonderful but so do a lot of guys that don't deserve to get paid 4+ million dollars. To compare him to Lindholm is out to lunch, Mang was on pace for 38 points this year for the first time, prior to the Lindholm signing, which I don't think anyone gawked at, was a great signing from the start, the sample size is 374 GP, at a half point per game, Mangiapane is .36/game which is worse than Bennett coming off of his ELC.

122 - 25 - 20, you would pay 4.5 for this stat line
159 - 31 - 32, Bennett coming off his ELC and got paid 1.95

Treliving signing Mangiapane to 4.5 after playing 122 games would be putting a nail in his own coffin.
11 sept. 2020 à 14 h 46
#9
Démarrer sujet
LittleBroDougie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 112
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: villenash
Ater Frolik was traded this past season, he only played ~20 games. He played better in an expanded role, but that is an extremely small sample size to justify that contract.


Frolik was traded 38 games into the season so there was ~35-40 games before covid hit. It is a small sample size but he's stepped up at every aspect of his career thus far including playoffs. Like I said - you pay a premium now to get a better deal later.

Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Mangiapane has great advanced stats and in a vacuum that is wonderful but so do a lot of guys that don't deserve to get paid 4+ million dollars. To compare him to Lindholm is out to lunch, Mang was on pace for 38 points this year for the first time, prior to the Lindholm signing, which I don't think anyone gawked at, was a great signing from the start, the sample size is 374 GP, at a half point per game, Mangiapane is .36/game which is worse than Bennett coming off of his ELC.

122 - 25 - 20, you would pay 4.5 for this stat line
159 - 31 - 32, Bennett coming off his ELC and got paid 1.95

Treliving signing Mangiapane to 4.5 after playing 122 games would be putting a nail in his own coffin.


I'm not sure how you can say in a vaccuum in this scenario. It's not a player that is struggling to produce but putting up good metrics, or a player with good points and bad metric. He's excelling at both which is a good sign.

He was on pace for 38 points IF you include the start when he was playing bottom-6 and often fourth line. You can't compare Bennett trajectory when Bennett was playing with Mikael Backlund while Mang was playing with Hathaway and Ryan last year and jumped up significantly once Frolik was traded...

Lindy had 45 + 44 pts back-to-back years (playing with Aho I might add) when the trade was made. He found his groove and skyrocketed. I will guarantee you Mang puts up at least 20g/60pts per 82 game pace if playing in the top-6. Fans will be begging for this contract at that point.
11 sept. 2020 à 14 h 51
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,247
Mentions "j'aime": 7,114
Quoting: LittleBroDougie
Frolik was traded 38 games into the season so there was ~35-40 games before covid hit. It is a small sample size but he's stepped up at every aspect of his career thus far including playoffs. Like I said - you pay a premium now to get a better deal later.


If you're counting playoff games, sure. He did fine in the playoffs too. I understand your reasoning of paying more now to get a better deal later, but I just think you can get him for cheaper on a deal like this. But if you're cool with it, then that's all that matters! Hopefully he turns into a solid top 6 player for CGY!
11 sept. 2020 à 15 h 10
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: LittleBroDougie
I'm not sure how you can say in a vaccuum in this scenario. It's not a player that is struggling to produce but putting up good metrics, or a player with good points and bad metric. He's excelling at both which is a good sign.

He was on pace for 38 points IF you include the start when he was playing bottom-6 and often fourth line. You can't compare Bennett trajectory when Bennett was playing with Mikael Backlund while Mang was playing with Hathaway and Ryan last year and jumped up significantly once Frolik was traded...

Lindy had 45 + 44 pts back-to-back years (playing with Aho I might add) when the trade was made. He found his groove and skyrocketed. I will guarantee you Mang puts up at least 20g/60pts per 82 game pace if playing in the top-6. Fans will be begging for this contract at that point.


In a vacuum as in advanced stats are great for cherry picking arguments but don't paint an entire picture. Rocco Grimaldi (worse than Mangiapane), Oskar Lindblom (better than Mangiapane) should be your extension comparisons not Lindholm
11 sept. 2020 à 17 h 56
#12
Démarrer sujet
LittleBroDougie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 112
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: villenash
If you're counting playoff games, sure. He did fine in the playoffs too. I understand your reasoning of paying more now to get a better deal later, but I just think you can get him for cheaper on a deal like this. But if you're cool with it, then that's all that matters! Hopefully he turns into a solid top 6 player for CGY!


I'm all for getting him cheaper I'm just trying to be realistic about player expectations! Hahah

Quoting: SmugTkachuk
In a vacuum as in advanced stats are great for cherry picking arguments but don't paint an entire picture. Rocco Grimaldi (worse than Mangiapane), Oskar Lindblom (better than Mangiapane) should be your extension comparisons not Lindholm


I'm not sure I agree on those comparables but it is what it is. I'd be stoked to get Mang cheaper and put the money towards a more realistic contract for Markstrom!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage