SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What I fully expect

Créé par: ChiHawk
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 10 sept. 2020
Publié: 10 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Barely any moves is likely the reality. Maatta gets bought out or traded and Caggs will get traded or let go.

Not a fan of this but I believe this where the team is headed for next year.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 650 000 $
21 100 000 $
23 500 000 $
22 850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 412 039 $1 090 244 $5 982 500 $10 087 961 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 sept. 2020 à 14 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I’d be more than willing to take drake back. Trading him to Chicago wasn’t anything near the most damaging trade charelli made but might have been the stupidest. I would have fired him on the spot for acquiring manning.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 14 h 37
#2
Dead inside
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Timmah007
I’d be more than willing to take drake back. Trading him to Chicago wasn’t anything near the most damaging trade charelli made but might have been the stupidest. I would have fired him on the spot for acquiring manning.


Just the optics alone from trading for the guy who not only broke your best players collarbone as a rookie, but who also later said he did it on purpose should have gotten Chiarelli kicked out of Edmonton after being tarred and feathered.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 14 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Timmah007
I’d be more than willing to take drake back. Trading him to Chicago wasn’t anything near the most damaging trade charelli made but might have been the stupidest. I would have fired him on the spot for acquiring manning.


I am not waving a Charelli flag here, but in fairness, the Oilers were decimated with injuries on the blue line. Acquiring Manning was seen as a stop gap measure without it breaking the bank (asset wise) Manning’s tenure as an Oiler and sudden banishment to their farm team magnified the trade. There are far more devastating deals Charelli managed which make the Caggiula/Manning trade an after thought.
10 sept. 2020 à 15 h 4
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: TheGreatMistake
Just the optics alone from trading for the guy who not only broke your best players collarbone as a rookie, but who also later said he did it on purpose should have gotten Chiarelli kicked out of Edmonton after being tarred and feathered.


Exactly. I don’t actually believe for a second manning intended to cause that significant of an injury. But you gotta show support and respect for your player and all charelli had to do was not acquire him and he ****** that right up.
10 sept. 2020 à 15 h 10
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: Hawksince71
I am not waving a Charelli flag here, but in fairness, the Oilers were decimated with injuries on the blue line. Acquiring Manning was seen as a stop gap measure without it breaking the bank (asset wise) Manning’s tenure as an Oiler and sudden banishment to their farm team magnified the trade. There are far more devastating deals Charelli managed which make the Caggiula/Manning trade an after thought.


Yes I agree it wasn’t his most damaging trade but it wasn’t a good sign of support towards his best player and to me that’s a very significant aspect. He reportedly spoke to mcdavid months before about that as an option and got thumbs up from mcdavid but I personally don’t think that’s something the organization should have even entertained. Fact he was approached and asked about it soo far in advance shows the option was already on the table before the injuries piled up.
10 sept. 2020 à 17 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,273
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Strome will get more money on a bridge deal and suter should make the starting line up but roster looks accurate. The stan bowman post dynasty specialty: underwhelming trades and "we like our team"
10 sept. 2020 à 17 h 22
#7
hawkman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 686
Mentions "j'aime": 112
I really do not want to see kookoo on the team . To soft and to many giveaways every game . Carlsson is a better option . So is Seabrook
10 sept. 2020 à 21 h 26
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: newman23
Strome will get more money on a bridge deal and suter should make the starting line up but roster looks accurate. The stan bowman post dynasty specialty: underwhelming trades and "we like our team"


I wouldn't be so sure of that and he's not arbitration eligible.

https://www.secondcityhockey.com/2020/9/9/21410249/chicago-blackhawks-dylan-strome-restricted-free-agent-comparable-contracts-nhl-free-agency-2020

Suter maybe, but depends on how camp and preseason goes for him.
11 sept. 2020 à 12 h 15
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,273
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: ChiHawk
I wouldn't be so sure of that and he's not arbitration eligible.

https://www.secondcityhockey.com/2020/9/9/21410249/chicago-blackhawks-dylan-strome-restricted-free-agent-comparable-contracts-nhl-free-agency-2020

Suter maybe, but depends on how camp and preseason goes for him.


Hes better than all those bridge deal comparables, if his less talented brother got 3.1 he should be getting around 3.5. Especially if we have cap space available. Bowman always like to spend up to the limit.
11 sept. 2020 à 20 h 27
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: newman23
Hes better than all those bridge deal comparables, if his less talented brother got 3.1 he should be getting around 3.5. Especially if we have cap space available. Bowman always like to spend up to the limit.


The difference is all those bridge deals were signed during a increase in cap and Dylan has no arbitration rights. He may not get $3M.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage