SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Buying low

Créé par: Vizix
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 9 sept. 2020
Publié: 9 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 000 000 $
21 850 000 $
43 795 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
2850 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Anderson, Josh [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (COL)
2.
SJS
  1. Hinostroza, Vinnie [Droits de RFA]
ARI
  1. Sörensen, Marcus
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
3.
CAR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
4.
SJS
  1. Honka, Julius [Liste de réserve]
DAL
  1. Suomela, Antti [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 256 666 $0 $297 500 $8 243 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 795 000 $3 795 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 sept. 2020 à 3 h 4
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Canes accept, the rest decline.
9 sept. 2020 à 3 h 17
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 111
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: justaBoss
Canes accept, the rest decline.


what needs to be changed?
9 sept. 2020 à 3 h 20
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Vizix
what needs to be changed?


Just purely my opinion, but I think CBJ requires SJ 2nd for Anderson, especially if they're attaching a low pick to the trade.

Hinostroza is all in all a better player than Sorensen. I'd make it a 3rd instead of a 5th going ARI.

As for the DAL trade, they'd be trading a semi potential asset for an asset with little to no potential they don't really even need. If something, DAL should move Honka for another prospect or a pick.
9 sept. 2020 à 3 h 39
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Columbus would be better off if you offersheeted, because then we don’t lose a 6th as well. Also, if you can get Anderson to sign for $2M for three years, we’d just keep him. Part of the reason he might be available is his camp feels he was hard done by in negotiations on his last contract. Man wants paid.
9 sept. 2020 à 4 h 28
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 111
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: MerzEXEMPTlikins
Columbus would be better off if you offersheeted, because then we don’t lose a 6th as well. Also, if you can get Anderson to sign for $2M for three years, we’d just keep him. Part of the reason he might be available is his camp feels he was hard done by in negotiations on his last contract. Man wants paid.


Didn't know that thanks for the info
9 sept. 2020 à 7 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,370
Mentions "j'aime": 861
Quoting: MerzEXEMPTlikins
Columbus would be better off if you offersheeted, because then we don’t lose a 6th as well. Also, if you can get Anderson to sign for $2M for three years, we’d just keep him. Part of the reason he might be available is his camp feels he was hard done by in negotiations on his last contract. Man wants paid.


You could offersheet but you would have to offer at least 5 mil per because that is what he is rumored to be wanting. Plus, you signed him at 2 mil which would never happen because his qualifying offer is 2.3 mil.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage