SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Danault 2021-22

Créé par: Richard88
Équipe: 2021-22 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 8 sept. 2020
Publié: 8 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3750 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
79 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
2900 000 $
21 800 000 $
43 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
87 500 000 $
55 000 000 $
65 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
    Danault extended at $5.5m x 6 - trade in 2020 offseason.
    MTL
    1. Beaucage, Alex [Liste de réserve]
    2. Graves, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (COL)
    2.
    COL
      Seattle

      Expansion Draft Protection (7+3+1):

      - Mackinnon, Rantanen, Landeskog, Kadri, Danault, Burakovsky, Nichuskin
      - Makar, Girard, Johnson (NMC)
      - Grubauer

      Exposed:
      - Compher, Donskoi, O'Connor, Zadorov, Francouz
      3.
      COL
      1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
      Détails additionnels:
      To whoever for futures.
      4.
      COL
      1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
      Détails additionnels:
      For pick(s) from whoever.
      BUF
      1. Jost, Tyson [Droits de RFA]
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de COL
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      Logo de FLA
      Logo de COL
      2021
      Logo de COL
      Logo de FLA
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      2022
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      Logo de COL
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2281 500 000 $82 098 963 $1 741 463 $3 125 000 $-598 963 $

      Formation

      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      925 000 $925 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 8
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      C
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
      AD
      RFA - 2
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      C, AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      900 000 $900 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      750 000 $750 000 $
      AD
      RFA
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
      DG/DD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
      DD
      RFA - 2
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      8 sept. 2020 à 20 h 52
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2019
      Messages: 6,270
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
      If Danault isnt happy playing a reduced role in Montreal, why is happy and re-signing doing it in Colorado?
      8 sept. 2020 à 20 h 54
      #2
      Am Yisrael Chai
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2018
      Messages: 18,521
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,702
      Donskoi and Zadorov to Buffalo for 2021 2nd and 3rd
      8 sept. 2020 à 20 h 57
      #3
      Démarrer sujet
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,580
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
      Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
      Donskoi and Zadorov to Buffalo for 2021 2nd and 3rd


      Zadorov could get that on his own sans Donskoi. We need to keep one of Zadorov/Graves though.
      8 sept. 2020 à 20 h 58
      #4
      Démarrer sujet
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,580
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
      Modifié 8 sept. 2020 à 21 h 13
      Quoting: Byrr
      If Danault isnt happy playing a reduced role in Montreal, why is happy and re-signing doing it in Colorado?


      Because in Colorado he'd be playing on a top contender that plays offensive hockey. By extending him immediately he wouldn't have to worry about putting up points in a contract year either.

      He'd also get competent linemates to play with instead of the likes of Byron/Weal/etc.
      Blazingbat11 a aimé ceci.
      8 sept. 2020 à 22 h 24
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 11,256
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
      That effectively blocks Newhook. Sure it’d be nice to run Dannault as the 3C but the Avs I believe are very eager to get Newhook and Byram into the NHL, and Newhook is a C they shouldn’t mess around playing him on the wing, BC tried it and the results were meh, they moved him back to C and they were wow.
      8 sept. 2020 à 23 h 10
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2018
      Messages: 15,213
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
      So let me get this straight! Danault who is arguably one of the top 10 2 way centers in the league is only worth a Grave + Beaucage + 1st after playing in the NHL for 7 years and is able to shut down the top players in the league on a nightly basis. Where as a guy who has never even played an NHL game is somehow worth more! Rediculous that Avs fans seem to think Byram is worth more than Drouin + Struble + Poehling + 2020 1st round pick (MTL) + 2021 2nd round pick (MTL) + 2021 3rd round pick (MTL). That is like saying Norlinder is worth Burakovski + Timmins + Beaucage + 1st + 2nd + 3rd.

      So if a guy like Byram who has yet to play in the NHL is worth that much I guess Suzuki is worth McKinnon + Rantanen + Girard + Timmins + 2020 1st + 2021 1st + 2022 1st!
      8 sept. 2020 à 23 h 15
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 2,012
      Mentions "j'aime": 556
      Quoting: Richard88
      Because in Colorado he'd be playing on a top contender that plays offensive hockey. By extending him immediately he wouldn't have to worry about putting up points in a contract year either.

      He'd also get competent linemates to play with instead of the likes of Byron/Weal/etc.


      Danault has played with Tatar and Gallagher for the past few years. If Montreal is looking to upgrade their wingers, he may continue playing with Tatar and/or Gallagher. Although I agree, if he wants a Cup right now, I could see him signing a 2-3 year extension.
      9 sept. 2020 à 5 h 50
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,580
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      That effectively blocks Newhook. Sure it’d be nice to run Dannault as the 3C but the Avs I believe are very eager to get Newhook and Byram into the NHL, and Newhook is a C they shouldn’t mess around playing him on the wing, BC tried it and the results were meh, they moved him back to C and they were wow.

      I disagree, I don't think it blocks Newhook. He can start on the wing for 1 season and then take over Kadri's spot at C in 2022.

      Newhook is obviously going to be a C long-term, but I think we can afford to have him on the wing for a year. We need to be going for a cup.
      9 sept. 2020 à 5 h 53
      #9
      Démarrer sujet
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,580
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
      Quoting: RobbStark03
      Danault has played with Tatar and Gallagher for the past few years. If Montreal is looking to upgrade their wingers, he may continue playing with Tatar and/or Gallagher. Although I agree, if he wants a Cup right now, I could see him signing a 2-3 year extension.

      I doubt he signs for only 2-3 years. Players always tend to look for long-term security if they can get it.

      Montreal split up Tatar-Gallaher and Danault in the playoffs and that might be a sign of things to come.

      If we acquired Danault I think we could recrete that Tatar-Danault-Gallagher line somewhat with a line of Landeskog-Danault-Kaut... Landeskog is the physical guy (Gallagher), and Kaut would be the more cerebral finisher, like Tatar.
      9 sept. 2020 à 9 h 12
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 11,256
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
      Quoting: Richard88
      I disagree, I don't think it blocks Newhook. He can start on the wing for 1 season and then take over Kadri's spot at C in 2022.

      Newhook is obviously going to be a C long-term, but I think we can afford to have him on the wing for a year. We need to be going for a cup.


      Did you see him play wing at BC? So the plan is to not play him at C then drop him in at 2C? I know you’re being creative and I like it, but if you do that you might as well trade Newhook and roll What you have above. But answer me this, if the Avs has Dannault against Dallas do you think the results would have been different?
      9 sept. 2020 à 9 h 40
      #11
      Démarrer sujet
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,580
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      Did you see him play wing at BC? So the plan is to not play him at C then drop him in at 2C? I know you’re being creative and I like it, but if you do that you might as well trade Newhook and roll What you have above. But answer me this, if the Avs has Dannault against Dallas do you think the results would have been different?


      It's not ideal to have Newhook on the wing. Maybe the solution is to roll with Mackinnon-Kadri-Danault down the middle in 20-21, and then trade Kadri in 2021 with 1 year to UFA and roll with Mackinnon-Danault-Newhook.

      If we had Danault against Dallas our 3rd line would have showed up a lot more and been a force. We would have been better on key faceoffs, and also on the PK. I'd be inclined to think that we would have been better off against Dallas with him. But obviously you can't legislate for goalie meltdowns so perhaps it would have made no difference.
      9 sept. 2020 à 9 h 53
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 11,256
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
      Quoting: Richard88
      It's not ideal to have Newhook on the wing. Maybe the solution is to roll with Mackinnon-Kadri-Danault down the middle in 20-21, and then trade Kadri in 2021 with 1 year to UFA and roll with Mackinnon-Danault-Newhook.

      If we had Danault against Dallas our 3rd line would have showed up a lot more and been a force. We would have been better on key faceoffs, and also on the PK. I'd be inclined to think that we would have been better off against Dallas with him. But obviously you can't legislate for goalie meltdowns so perhaps it would have made no difference.


      I disagree wholeheartedly. He wouldn’t have improved the PK because it is fundamentally flawed at the plan phase, how would he have prevented all the cross and diagonal passes that lead to back door goals? The 3rd line accounted for 2 of the 4 goals scored in game 7. The bottom 6 wasn’t the problem in the series you know that
      9 sept. 2020 à 9 h 59
      #13
      Démarrer sujet
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,580
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      I disagree wholeheartedly. He wouldn’t have improved the PK because it is fundamentally flawed at the plan phase, how would he have prevented all the cross and diagonal passes that lead to back door goals? The 3rd line accounted for 2 of the 4 goals scored in game 7. The bottom 6 wasn’t the problem in the series you know that


      The 3rd line was relegated to being our 4th line for most of this series. With a better 3rd line we would have dominated them even more.

      But yeah maybe it wouldn't have made a huge difference to the PK or goaltending obviously.

      That said, Danault on this team going forwards elevates us to Tampa's level imo.
      9 sept. 2020 à 10 h 17
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 11,256
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
      Quoting: Richard88
      The 3rd line was relegated to being our 4th line for most of this series. With a better 3rd line we would have dominated them even more.

      But yeah maybe it wouldn't have made a huge difference to the PK or goaltending obviously.

      That said, Danault on this team going forwards elevates us to Tampa's level imo.


      We are at Tampa’s level minus goal tending and PK. The Avs are a dominant 5v5 team. If they had even below average PK and goal tending they destroy Dallas. I mean c’mon in the 4 loses the highest save percentage was .854 and they had a chance to win 3 of those games. I think at on pt the PK was not exaggerating like 60% for the series, that is 100% on coaching.
      9 sept. 2020 à 11 h 23
      #15
      Démarrer sujet
      John 3 16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 9,580
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,616
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      We are at Tampa’s level minus goal tending and PK. The Avs are a dominant 5v5 team. If they had even below average PK and goal tending they destroy Dallas. I mean c’mon in the 4 loses the highest save percentage was .854 and they had a chance to win 3 of those games. I think at on pt the PK was not exaggerating like 60% for the series, that is 100% on coaching.


      With a healthy lineup Tampa have Stamkos - Point - Cirelli - Gourde down the middle.

      We'd need a competent 3C to get to that level.
      9 sept. 2020 à 12 h 36
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 11,256
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
      Quoting: Richard88
      With a healthy lineup Tampa have Stamkos - Point - Cirelli - Gourde down the middle.

      We'd need a competent 3C to get to that level.


      Yeah Stamkos doesn’t play center anymore, or should I say very rarely. Love him hate him, Compher is every bit the Gourde is minus his ridiculous contract. And I’ve said it and I’ll stand by it, if you are investing heavy capital in your bottom 6 you are doing it wrong.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage