SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Goalie next year

Créé par: JTrades
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 7 sept. 2020
Publié: 7 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If the leafs trade Andersen how comfortable are you with Campbell? Personally I'd like to see the leafs go with a tandem next year instead of a big name UFA. All the teams left in the playoffs except Tampa have used two goalies

The trades are just some thoughts. go ahead, let me know that my value is way off on both sides :)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
1800 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1750 000 $
32 000 000 $
31 650 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Hutton, Carter
  2. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 827 283 $0 $0 $672 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 sept. 2020 à 8 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Hutton 😂

Ristolainen 😭😭😭

Stop with these, I’m going to die 🤣
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
7 sept. 2020 à 9 h 3
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,465
I don't. mind the the concept of the trades. One trouble with Risto is his 5.4m cap hit into 21/22 leaving the Leafs with little cap room.
7 sept. 2020 à 9 h 25
#3
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Bud. Hutton is worse than Campbell. He has some sort of eye problem I think. And Risto is worse than Barrie. You will cry for Barrie to come back.
7 sept. 2020 à 10 h 49
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 353
Quoting: Saskleaf
Bud. Hutton is worse than Campbell. He has some sort of eye problem I think. And Risto is worse than Barrie. You will cry for Barrie to come back.


That's why he is 1B offensively yes but he can't be worse on D
7 sept. 2020 à 14 h 23
#5
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,179
Mentions "j'aime": 9,152
Quoting: JTrades
That's why he is 1B offensively yes but he can't be worse on D


I don't know. Apparently he is.
8 sept. 2020 à 10 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: MMXD
Hutton 😂

Ristolainen 😭😭😭

Stop with these, I’m going to die 🤣


Quoting: palhal
I don't. mind the the concept of the trades. One trouble with Risto is his 5.4m cap hit into 21/22 leaving the Leafs with little cap room.


Quoting: JTrades
That's why he is 1B offensively yes but he can't be worse on D


Quoting: Saskleaf
I don't know. Apparently he is.


No Sabre AGM commented, so I will be the first.
First:
While many doubt this Ristolainen is Buffalo top defenseman.
Many may laugh and say so what, the whole defense sucks.
Well this defense that is suppose to suck gave up fewer 5 on 5 goals than all but 8 NHL teams last year.
They did this with a blind GK and an offense that could not keep the puck out of the defensive zone.

Second:
Please stop sending Johnsson to Buffalo.
Buffalo has Skinner, Olofsson, Johansson and Girgensons all had more goals than Johansson, why would Buffalo need a fifth LW.

Third:
Hutton has no trade value now.
To start the season he set a Sabre record for the most saves to record a shut out.
Then he went blind and could not see the puck and lost 12 games in a row while recording a +4.00 GA %
So yes he has negative value.

Fourth:
Kerfoot has 113 points over the last 3 seasons while Ristolainen has 117.
Ristolainen is a top pairing defenseman (on a team that did well to stop 5 on 5 goals). Kerfoot is a #3 Center.
Kerfoot does not KP, and gets very limited PP time (even the not needed Johansson got nearly double the PP time he)
I would not trade Ristolainen one for one for Kerfoot, I would need more coming back and that is not Johansson.

So Leaf fans can bemoan that this not a fair trade for them, it does nothing for Buffalo.
Johansson would be our fifth LW, in case that does not sink in, that means press box.
Kerfoot would be the Sabres 3rd center when Buffalo needs a #2 Center.
Then I need to add draft picks for players (who have value) that do not fill needs for Buffalo.
This is a very easy pass for Buffalo.

There that is my rant of the day, Stay tuned tomorrow for my next one. laugh
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
8 sept. 2020 à 12 h 26
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 696
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
No Sabre AGM commented, so I will be the first.
First:
While many doubt this Ristolainen is Buffalo top defenseman.
Many may laugh and say so what, the whole defense sucks.
Well this defense that is suppose to suck gave up fewer 5 on 5 goals than all but 8 NHL teams last year.
They did this with a blind GK and an offense that could not keep the puck out of the defensive zone.

Second:
Please stop sending Johnsson to Buffalo.
Buffalo has Skinner, Olofsson, Johansson and Girgensons all had more goals than Johansson, why would Buffalo need a fifth LW.

Third:
Hutton has no trade value now.
To start the season he set a Sabre record for the most saves to record a shut out.
Then he went blind and could not see the puck and lost 12 games in a row while recording a +4.00 GA %
So yes he has negative value.

Fourth:
Kerfoot has 113 points over the last 3 seasons while Ristolainen has 117.
Ristolainen is a top pairing defenseman (on a team that did well to stop 5 on 5 goals). Kerfoot is a #3 Center.
Kerfoot does not KP, and gets very limited PP time (even the not needed Johansson got nearly double the PP time he)
I would not trade Ristolainen one for one for Kerfoot, I would need more coming back and that is not Johansson.

So Leaf fans can bemoan that this not a fair trade for them, it does nothing for Buffalo.
Johansson would be our fifth LW, in case that does not sink in, that means press box.
Kerfoot would be the Sabres 3rd center when Buffalo needs a #2 Center.
Then I need to add draft picks for players (who have value) that do not fill needs for Buffalo.
This is a very easy pass for Buffalo.

There that is my rant of the day, Stay tuned tomorrow for my next one. laugh


Ristolainen is an offensive defenseman, last thing they want
11 sept. 2020 à 21 h 31
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 353
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
No Sabre AGM commented, so I will be the first.
First:
While many doubt this Ristolainen is Buffalo top defenseman.
Many may laugh and say so what, the whole defense sucks.
Well this defense that is suppose to suck gave up fewer 5 on 5 goals than all but 8 NHL teams last year.
They did this with a blind GK and an offense that could not keep the puck out of the defensive zone.

Second:
Please stop sending Johnsson to Buffalo.
Buffalo has Skinner, Olofsson, Johansson and Girgensons all had more goals than Johansson, why would Buffalo need a fifth LW.

Third:
Hutton has no trade value now.
To start the season he set a Sabre record for the most saves to record a shut out.
Then he went blind and could not see the puck and lost 12 games in a row while recording a +4.00 GA %
So yes he has negative value.

Fourth:
Kerfoot has 113 points over the last 3 seasons while Ristolainen has 117.
Ristolainen is a top pairing defenseman (on a team that did well to stop 5 on 5 goals). Kerfoot is a #3 Center.
Kerfoot does not KP, and gets very limited PP time (even the not needed Johansson got nearly double the PP time he)
I would not trade Ristolainen one for one for Kerfoot, I would need more coming back and that is not Johansson.

So Leaf fans can bemoan that this not a fair trade for them, it does nothing for Buffalo.
Johansson would be our fifth LW, in case that does not sink in, that means press box.
Kerfoot would be the Sabres 3rd center when Buffalo needs a #2 Center.
Then I need to add draft picks for players (who have value) that do not fill needs for Buffalo.
This is a very easy pass for Buffalo.

There that is my rant of the day, Stay tuned tomorrow for my next one. laugh



Thanks for the well thought out response! In my mind resto needs a change of senior but can still be a very good defence man. He is a bit of a risk though. I think Kerfoot is worth less because he is a forward. I think Johnsson is not a need for Buffalo but they did trade for Frolik. As a non Sabers fan it seems like they need more forwards. I truly think Johnsson would be an upgrade for Buffalo but not their biggest need. I didn't know about the eye think for Hutton or his current health but to me he seems like is has negative value but could bounce back, health reasons aside. My thinking was because of this a 2 for 2 trade with similar money going each way might make sense
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage