SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Full Breakdown

Créé par: coreydox
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 sept. 2020
Publié: 6 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 750 000 $
11 250 000 $
32 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
14 500 000 $
22 250 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Jost, Tyson [Droits de RFA]
  2. Timmins, Conor
Détails additionnels:
Leafs make this deal because:
Timmins has a Soo connection, fills the leafs biggest hole on the right side and gives them a bit of youth on an ELC. Seems like a good fit.
Jost only played 12 min in the game 7 loss to Dallas so his role is diminishing there and he could fit in on Toronto’s bottom 6 and have a restart.
Moving out Andersen clears the cap space and gives Toronto a bit more wiggle room.
COL
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. Liljegren, Timothy
Détails additionnels:
Colorado makes this deal because it gives them a number 1 goalie on a good contract and gives them opportunity to avoid having to expose a goalie the covet.
Liljigren gives them some depth and replaces Timmins on the RD.
2.
TOR
  1. McCann, Jared [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Toronto makes this deal because
McCann also has a Soo connection and can slot in on the 3C role. They can sign him a bit cheaper then Kerfoots deal and use that cap space.
PIT
  1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
Détails additionnels:
Pittsburgh makes this deal because
They bring in Kerfoot who is on a reasonable contract and brings a bit more experience to the lineup. He can also play up on the wings if needed.
Dermott gives them added depth on D and could start season on their blue line.
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
4.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 204 783 $0 $0 $295 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 533 333 $1 533 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 53
#1
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,576
Mentions "j'aime": 4,615
Interesting deal for Colorado. I'm tempted. But depends on how Liljegren is looking. How NHL ready is he? And what's his upside?
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 8
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,590
Mentions "j'aime": 18,152
How about Jost for Andersen? That seems about equal value. A Jost/Timmons for Andersen/Liljegren would likely need a small add from TOR.
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 9
#3
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
avs accept
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,197
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: Richard88
Interesting deal for Colorado. I'm tempted. But depends on how Liljegren is looking. How NHL ready is he? And what's his upside?


ready to fill in for injuries this year, but NHL regular likely in 21-22. Drafted as an offensive D, he's really become a more defensively responsible guy, while still putting up good offensive numbers. The scouts say he'll be a defensively sound top 4 D that can move the puck and skate well. May not rack up points the same as he did in AHL and in Junior, but will be very effective all over the ice. I personally think he'll be a really good 2nd pair D, with upside to be a very effective top pair D.
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 20
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Richard88
Interesting deal for Colorado. I'm tempted. But depends on how Liljegren is looking. How NHL ready is he? And what's his upside?


He's going to be a good player. Not an offensive force but a two way guy who is responsible defensively and has all the tools to move the puck out of danger. This proposed trade is not good. It's Liljegren for Timmins which is a wash and then Jost for Andersen which is not remotely fair.
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 25
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Quoting: Richard88
Interesting deal for Colorado. I'm tempted. But depends on how Liljegren is looking. How NHL ready is he? And what's his upside?


I doubt that Liljegren will never amount to anything more than a lower pairing guy to be honest. The Leaf-Fan hype for him is always overblown on here.

As a Leafs fan, I would make that trade in a heartbeat. (The Colorado one).
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 25
#7
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,576
Mentions "j'aime": 4,615
Quoting: leafs101
ready to fill in for injuries this year, but NHL regular likely in 21-22. Drafted as an offensive D, he's really become a more defensively responsible guy, while still putting up good offensive numbers. The scouts say he'll be a defensively sound top 4 D that can move the puck and skate well. May not rack up points the same as he did in AHL and in Junior, but will be very effective all over the ice. I personally think he'll be a really good 2nd pair D, with upside to be a very effective top pair D.


If he's that much of a sure thing to be a 2RHD doesn't this trade seem kinda lopsided in favour of Colorado? I mean Timmins is good but is the difference between him and Liljegren really big enough to warrant trading Andersen for Jost? I don't watch much of Liljegren so I honestly don't know what his value is. Also worth considering that Timmins has had health issues.
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 28
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,197
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: Richard88
If he's that much of a sure thing to be a 2RHD doesn't this trade seem kinda lopsided in favour of Colorado? I mean Timmins is good but is the difference between him and Liljegren really big enough to warrant trading Andersen for Jost? I don't watch much of Liljegren so I honestly don't know what his value is. Also worth considering that Timmins has had health issues.


I mean he's not a "sure thing", but I'm pretty confident that that is what he'll be. I wouldn't do it if I was Toronto because I think the difference isn't very big between Timmins and Liljegren. Only considerable thing for TOR is that if you think Timmins is better, which could definitely be argued, or if you think he's NHL ready this year, that's another ELC contract. But I wouldn't do it personally.
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 52
#9
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,576
Mentions "j'aime": 4,615
Quoting: leafs101
I mean he's not a "sure thing", but I'm pretty confident that that is what he'll be. I wouldn't do it if I was Toronto because I think the difference isn't very big between Timmins and Liljegren. Only considerable thing for TOR is that if you think Timmins is better, which could definitely be argued, or if you think he's NHL ready this year, that's another ELC contract. But I wouldn't do it personally.

Timmins played in game 5 and 6 for us in the playoffs so I think it's pretty clear that he's NHL ready.
6 sept. 2020 à 11 h 50
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,248
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
I think the Avs would accept.
6 sept. 2020 à 11 h 51
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
McCann for Kerfoot, Dermott

Kerfoot is $3.5M, you have McCann signing for $2.75M. Why wouldn't the Penguins just keep the better and cheaper McCann? (The Penguins have a boat load of 3rd pair, 6/7D, so Dermott doesnt bridge).

Counter with... McCann for Kerfoot ($750K ret], Dermott
6 sept. 2020 à 11 h 52
#12
Hockey God Genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,260
Mentions "j'aime": 810
Id keep McCann over both

Pens pass
TySmith4Norris a aimé ceci.
6 sept. 2020 à 11 h 52
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
When you say get a number one goalie on a good contract that would imply there is term on the contract which is not the case. Not saying it’s a bad deal still think it’s good but your kinda misleading with that part.
6 sept. 2020 à 13 h 52
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Timmah007
When you say get a number one goalie on a good contract that would imply there is term on the contract which is not the case. Not saying it’s a bad deal still think it’s good but your kinda misleading with that part.


Hence why i added that the benefit for Colorado is them not having to sign a goalie to long contract this year, then having to expose Francouz to Seattle. This gives them 1 good year of Andersen..they can protect which ever goalie they feel is the best...and then can go out and sign whomever they want, potentially being Andersen.
6 sept. 2020 à 15 h 41
#15
All-Team Pylon
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,625
Mentions "j'aime": 515
echoing above, McCann only moves to solve a need (3C or RD), Kerfoot isn't any more capable as a 3C so it's a pass
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage