SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big Pittsburgh trade

Équipe: 2020-21 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 6 sept. 2020
Publié: 6 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
24 000 000 $
2800 000 $
1900 000 $
22 345 000 $
54 750 000 $
66 750 000 $
2750 000 $
22 650 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
Transactions
BUF
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. McCann, Jared [Droits de RFA]
  3. Murray, Matt [Droits de RFA]
PIT
  1. Montour, Brandon [Droits de RFA]
  2. Pilut, Lawrence [Droits de RFA]
  3. Thompson, Tage [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de DAL
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 874 167 $1 487 500 $4 337 500 $2 625 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 345 000 $2 345 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
864 166 $864 166 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 sept. 2020 à 8 h 13
#1
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,927
Mentions "j'aime": 1,170
Deal
6 sept. 2020 à 8 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
would've done it for just the second rounder
6 sept. 2020 à 8 h 37
#3
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,570
Mentions "j'aime": 6,714
Little steep there bud. Murray will be gone in expansion so.....
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 8
#4
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Lol. A player that left for Europe and two bad players.

Just give up the 2nd for Murray and Bjugstad.
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 17
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Murray, McCann, Bjugstad for Montour, Pilut, Thompson, 2nd

Murray for Montour is close
McCann for 2nd is close
Bjugstad for Pilut, Thompson is bad for Pittsburgh (Pilut is a never-will-be and Thompson is not the style of player that Sullivan uses)

If Buffalo changes the Pilut, Thompson portion of this deal a bit... this could happen.

Overall very close though.
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Little steep there bud. Murray will be gone in expansion so.....



Murray would not be the goalie exposed over Ullmark. That is misguided.
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 19
#7
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,570
Mentions "j'aime": 6,714
Quoting: Yojimbo
Murray would not be the goalie exposed over Ullmark. That is misguided.


Losing either in expansion is unacceptable.
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 19
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,643
Mentions "j'aime": 14,427
Quoting: Yojimbo
Murray, McCann, Bjugstad for Montour, Pilut, Thompson, 2nd

Murray for Montour is close
McCann for 2nd is close
Bjugstad for Pilut, Thompson is bad for Pittsburgh (Pilut is a never-will-be and Thompson is not the style of player that Sullivan uses)

If Buffalo changes the Pilut, Thompson portion of this deal a bit... this could happen.

Overall very close though.


Bjugstad is a cap dump. He has no value. Pilut is believed to have an NHL out clause
Lenny54 et dzmets a aimé ceci.
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 20
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,643
Mentions "j'aime": 14,427
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Losing either in expansion is unacceptable.


Let's settle down
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 21
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,643
Mentions "j'aime": 14,427
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Lol. A player that left for Europe and two bad players.

Just give up the 2nd for Murray and Bjugstad.


Lol, Pittsburgh clears like 8 million in cap they desperately need and replace schultz with montour
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 23
#11
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,570
Mentions "j'aime": 6,714
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Let's settle down


ok
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Bjugstad is a cap dump. He has no value. Pilut is believed to have an NHL out clause


Bjugstad is expensive, but he is not a cap dump. He is a solid player, he was just injured last year (Bjugstad re-injured right at the start of the year and they tried to have him rehab/play through it but that didn't work so he had surgery.)

Pilut having an out-clause isn't relevant because he is not making the NHL regardless.
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 34
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,224
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Yojimbo
Murray, McCann, Bjugstad for Montour, Pilut, Thompson, 2nd

Murray for Montour is close
McCann for 2nd is close
Bjugstad for Pilut, Thompson is bad for Pittsburgh (Pilut is a never-will-be and Thompson is not the style of player that Sullivan uses)

If Buffalo changes the Pilut, Thompson portion of this deal a bit... this could happen.

Overall very close though.


We drop Pilut & Thompson and Pitt drops Bjugstad.
Personally I wouldn't help Pitt out that much. If Bjugstad is added in they should give us a draft pick as we are taking the cap dump.
Having Pilut and Thompson doesn't hurt us
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 42
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Lenny54
We drop Pilut & Thompson and Pitt drops Bjugstad.
Personally I wouldn't help Pitt out that much. If Bjugstad is added in they should give us a draft pick as we are taking the cap dump.
Having Pilut and Thompson doesn't hurt us


Bjugstad is not a cap dump. Pilut and Thompson don't hurt you at all because they are FAs.

But dropping the three if fine.
6 sept. 2020 à 9 h 53
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,224
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Yojimbo
Bjugstad is not a cap dump. Pilut and Thompson don't hurt you at all because they are FAs.

But dropping the three if fine.


I agree dropping the three works better IMO. My point was does Buffalo need Bjugstad as much as Pitt needs to get rid of his cap.
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 24
#16
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Lol, Pittsburgh clears like 8 million in cap they desperately need and replace schultz with montour


Montour is bad though. This is why Buffalo fans are cool trading him. Ruhwedel on basically a minimum contract was better than both he and Schultz last year. This team also has Marino and Letang. Zero reason to add a bad RHD.

Also, don't desperately need the cap space as this trade trades away most of their RFAs....
6 sept. 2020 à 10 h 27
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Lenny54
I agree dropping the three works better IMO. My point was does Buffalo need Bjugstad as much as Pitt needs to get rid of his cap.


Pittsburgh needs a 3C and Bjugstad actually fits that. They would rather the 3C be about $3M so Bjugstad is only about $1M "too much." $1M isn't a big cap issue. Basically the Penguins are willing to move Bjugstad, or keep him. Positives for the Penguins on both sides. So he isn't a dump, but he wouldn't cost much (but more than Pilut and Thompson).
6 sept. 2020 à 11 h 20
#18
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,830
Mentions "j'aime": 3,015
Pilut would come back if given an NHL deal, and he’s exactly the kind of puck moving defenseman Pittsburgh would love to have. He just won’t come back to Buffalo, so he is a non-asset to them. Taking on Bjugstad makes this a bad trade for Buffalo. They don’t need an overpaid third line center, they already have one in Johansson.
6 sept. 2020 à 11 h 21
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 4,032
Mentions "j'aime": 1,923
Wow is this a bad trade for Buffalo.
6 sept. 2020 à 15 h 43
#20
All-Team Pylon
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,625
Mentions "j'aime": 515
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Losing either in expansion is unacceptable.


Losing a backup over a roster forward/defenseman would be a massive win
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage