SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

KRUG

Créé par: Copenhagen
Équipe: 2020-21 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 4 sept. 2020
Publié: 4 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 000 000 $
55 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
77 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [Droits de RFA]
2.
3.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
4.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 489 032 $341 534 $730 000 $10 968 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
915 000 $915 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
I think the Bruins do this is they are able to sign Hall, Hoffman or Dadynov.

Krug Passing to McDavid and Draisaitl would be scary. I think he would be worn down by Western Conference teams and I don't thin he signs in Edmonton. I think it's Detroit or Boston. I could maybe see Chicago too.
Copenhagen et Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,181
Mentions "j'aime": 238
Carolina doesn't do that
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 10
#3
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Edmonton definitely needs more coming back than just Debrusk for Klefbom.
Copenhagen et Timmah007 a aimé ceci.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 10
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,228
Mentions "j'aime": 2,961
Canes pass. AA isnt a Canes type player, no defense, all oops. Kassian is being dragged by their centers to get to 34 points scoring. We arent footing that bill for 4 more years.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 13
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,649
Mentions "j'aime": 2,517
Quoting: ecupirate07
Canes pass. AA isnt a Canes type player, no defense, all oops. Kassian is being dragged by their centers to get to 34 points scoring. We arent footing that bill for 4 more years.


Dzingal isnt exactly lighting it up there either
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 14
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,228
Mentions "j'aime": 2,961
Quoting: Copenhagen
Dzingal isnt exactly lighting it up there either


1 year at 3.135 mil >>>>>>> 4 years of 3.2 million
BeterChiarelli a aimé ceci.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,228
Mentions "j'aime": 2,961
now if you wanted to do Gardiner and Mrazek for Kassian and Puljujarvi. I would consider it but I think Gardiner nixes it.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 18
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,649
Mentions "j'aime": 2,517
Quoting: ecupirate07
1 year at 3.135 mil >>>>>>> 4 years of 3.2 million


I forgot about his contract actually, i thought Kassian had only 2 years left. Like another crap contract signed by the oilers
ecupirate07 a aimé ceci.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 24
#9
Bringer_Of_Snow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,422
Mentions "j'aime": 670
While Krug is for sure a better player, I think I'd rather go the shorter term route with Barrie. Krug voiced his desire to cash in this contract, and while he deserves it, I think its the definition of a contract hats gonna be ugly in years 4-7. Oilers don't need anymore self-inflicted contract debacles. Once the buyout penalties are done with and Neal and Russell are eventually off the books, it'll be like a fresh start.

Oilers don't even touch that Bruins deal. Not even close. I've said this 1000 times on here, but while Klefbom is NOT a legitimate #1 dman and I'm not gonna argue that, for what he provides, a good puck mover who can eat 25 mins without showing signs of fatigue and only making slightly over $4M a year, he is way too valuable to move. For his price point for several more years, it makes ZERO sense to move him. Now more than ever the Oilers need value contracts. He is one of the few on the team who punches above his cap hit. Debrusk needs a new contract and has shown to be a very good 3rd line winger and easily skilled enough to be a 2nd line 40 pt guy. With his 40 pts, correct me if im wrong, but that with a good amount of time playing PP with that top unit, which is ridiculously stacked. At least thats what I remember seeing from all the Boston games I have watched.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 29
#10
Oilers GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,584
Mentions "j'aime": 566
Holy **** that Krug contract would be a HUGE mistake
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 29
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,500
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Krug had every Canadian team as part of his NTC, doubt he signs with EDM.
Copenhagen a aimé ceci.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 31
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,500
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Bringer_Of_Snow
While Krug is for sure a better player, I think I'd rather go the shorter term route with Barrie. Krug voiced his desire to cash in this contract, and while he deserves it, I think its the definition of a contract hats gonna be ugly in years 4-7. Oilers don't need anymore self-inflicted contract debacles. Once the buyout penalties are done with and Neal and Russell are eventually off the books, it'll be like a fresh start.

Oilers don't even touch that Bruins deal. Not even close. I've said this 1000 times on here, but while Klefbom is NOT a legitimate #1 dman and I'm not gonna argue that, for what he provides, a good puck mover who can eat 25 mins without showing signs of fatigue and only making slightly over $4M a year, he is way too valuable to move. For his price point for several more years, it makes ZERO sense to move him. Now more than ever the Oilers need value contracts. He is one of the few on the team who punches above his cap hit. Debrusk needs a new contract and has shown to be a very good 3rd line winger and easily skilled enough to be a 2nd line 40 pt guy. With his 40 pts, correct me if im wrong, but that with a good amount of time playing PP with that top unit, which is ridiculously stacked. At least thats what I remember seeing from all the Boston games I have watched.


DeBrusk since entering the league ranks top 20 in goals among all LW's, he's a 2nd liner. As for the PP, he rotated on the PP1 w/ Coyle & Heinen. They were basically option #5 on the PP which is why none of them really racked up a lot of PP points.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 32
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Edmonton definitely needs more coming back than just Debrusk for Klefbom.


I think it would work out. Debrusk can skate with McDavid. Part of Debrusk's inconsistency in Boston (IMO) was due to him and Krejci having very different styles of play. Krejci loves to slow things down and Debrusk can be unstoppable when he just skates.

Klefbom has also been hot or cold. Before this year, you would have done it in heartbeat.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 33
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,649
Mentions "j'aime": 2,517
Quoting: ken_holland
Holy **** that Krug contract would be a HUGE mistake


Well from what I hear, oilers are looking for a very good puck moving D. Barrie and Ceci are way worse mistakes to me. Krug can move the puck well. Otherwise I dont know what else is really out there that can do what Krug does.
ken_holland a aimé ceci.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 34
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,649
Mentions "j'aime": 2,517
Quoting: Bringer_Of_Snow
While Krug is for sure a better player, I think I'd rather go the shorter term route with Barrie. Krug voiced his desire to cash in this contract, and while he deserves it, I think its the definition of a contract hats gonna be ugly in years 4-7. Oilers don't need anymore self-inflicted contract debacles. Once the buyout penalties are done with and Neal and Russell are eventually off the books, it'll be like a fresh start.

Oilers don't even touch that Bruins deal. Not even close. I've said this 1000 times on here, but while Klefbom is NOT a legitimate #1 dman and I'm not gonna argue that, for what he provides, a good puck mover who can eat 25 mins without showing signs of fatigue and only making slightly over $4M a year, he is way too valuable to move. For his price point for several more years, it makes ZERO sense to move him. Now more than ever the Oilers need value contracts. He is one of the few on the team who punches above his cap hit. Debrusk needs a new contract and has shown to be a very good 3rd line winger and easily skilled enough to be a 2nd line 40 pt guy. With his 40 pts, correct me if im wrong, but that with a good amount of time playing PP with that top unit, which is ridiculously stacked. At least thats what I remember seeing from all the Boston games I have watched.


You mean the always injured Klefbomb. Ughhhhhhh
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 45
#16
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: Propeller09
I think it would work out. Debrusk can skate with McDavid. Part of Debrusk's inconsistency in Boston (IMO) was due to him and Krejci having very different styles of play. Krejci loves to slow things down and Debrusk can be unstoppable when he just skates.

Klefbom has also been hot or cold. Before this year, you would have done it in heartbeat.


Quite the opposite. Before this year I'd have never contemplated a Klefbom trade.

I am not - nor any NHL executive for that mater - interested in paying for what DeBrusk could be. Right now he's hovering around the lower half of second-line forwards:

- By PPG, DeBrusk is 156th among NHL forwards. If there are 93 first line forwards, 93 second-line, etc, then DeBrusk - by metric of scoring among forwards - is in the lower half of second-line forwards
- By PPG, DeBrusk is 49th among LW's: by definition there should be 62 top-six calibre NHL left wings, this puts him again in the bottom half of second-line LW's

If DeBrusk has performed in his career thus far to the tune of a below-average second-line LW, then Edmonton should pay the acquisition cost as such. If Kapanen (given that he ranks 44th out of RW's) can be used as an extreme example in the Bruins' favour for what Boston is in the market for, Klefbom is immediately worth more than what DeBrusk is, and it's not a narrow margin.

I've proposed Trent Frederic and the 2021 2nd Round Pick in an alternative discussion. I think this would be a minimum add for the Oilers to consider trading Klefbom for DeBrusk.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 49
#17
Bringer_Of_Snow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,422
Mentions "j'aime": 670
Quoting: Copenhagen
You mean the always injured Klefbomb. Ughhhhhhh


Hes played about 271 of a possible 316 games over the last 4 season. I mean he misses some games, including a decent amount due to a freak staph infection which ended his season one time. But I would argue thats not enough to label him as "often injured". Keep that narrative though.

Even with with missing some time, you can't argue his contract isn't great. Although you might figure out a way too.
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 55
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,649
Mentions "j'aime": 2,517
Quoting: Bringer_Of_Snow
Hes played about 271 of a possible 316 games over the last 4 season. I mean he misses some games, including a decent amount due to a freak staph infection which ended his season one time. But I would argue thats not enough to label him as "often injured". Keep that narrative though.

Even with with missing some time, you can't argue his contract isn't great. Although you might figure out a way too.


Contract is awesome. He lost 50 games n 1 year plus 20 plus 20 plus 20 in other years. Not sure how your math adds up
4 sept. 2020 à 13 h 58
#19
Bringer_Of_Snow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,422
Mentions "j'aime": 670
Quoting: Copenhagen
Contract is awesome. He lost 50 games n 1 year plus 20 plus 20 plus 20 in other years. Not sure how your math adds up


I was looking at his last 4 season where he played 82, 66, 61 and 62.
Copenhagen a aimé ceci.
4 sept. 2020 à 14 h 23
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Get real, For 7 x 7 Krug stays in Boston. He wants either 6 x 8 or 7 x 8. Detroit will easily outbid that he wants to get paid.
4 sept. 2020 à 14 h 32
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
Is Tyler Benson the prize for taking James Neal contract? I know he had great year last season in Bakersfield...what was verdict on this season? and going forward?
4 sept. 2020 à 14 h 35
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,649
Mentions "j'aime": 2,517
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Get real, For 7 x 7 Krug stays in Boston. He wants either 6 x 8 or 7 x 8. Detroit will easily outbid that he wants to get paid.


Well enjoy Krug than.I will look for option B..... Get Real, not every team gets their man they are going after, so if we dont, than we dont.
4 sept. 2020 à 14 h 36
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,649
Mentions "j'aime": 2,517
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Is Tyler Benson the prize for taking James Neal contract? I know he had great year last season in Bakersfield...what was verdict on this season? and going forward?


Yes he was the price, I think he needs a half season still, same as Bouchard for me, probably be best if both had half a season in ahl
4 sept. 2020 à 15 h 8
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
Quoting: Copenhagen
Yes he was the price, I think he needs a half season still, same as Bouchard for me, probably be best if both had half a season in ahl


Bouchard would be preferred if its a choice...but dunno about Benson. He seemed too 'untouchable' this time last year....and too 'available' this year. I have seen him in Studnicka, Foote, Wahlstrom tier of prospect wingers...and seen him completely off prospect lists. Haven't seen him myself, save a game or two. He is hard guy to get read on.
4 sept. 2020 à 15 h 12
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,649
Mentions "j'aime": 2,517
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Bouchard would be preferred if its a choice...but dunno about Benson. He seemed too 'untouchable' this time last year....and too 'available' this year. I have seen him in Studnicka, Foote, Wahlstrom tier of prospect wingers...and seen him completely off prospect lists. Haven't seen him myself, save a game or two. He is hard guy to get read on.


Bouchard is not for sale no matter what. I just put Benson in because i had to give to get. most have him starting the year in edmonton.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage