SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Andersen for Francouz

Créé par: Richard88
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 2 sept. 2020
Publié: 2 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Rumours in the media has Andersen being shopped.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
44 850 000 $
32 750 000 $
22 150 000 $
2875 000 $
32 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Andersen, Frederik
Détails additionnels:
Leafs save $3m in this trade, and can allocated some of that to upgrade Campbell as well and run with a fairly cheap 1A/1B tandem.

Colorado have capspace and adding Andersen would safeguard against Grubauer's groin injury recurring again next year by having another proven starter, with Grubauer+Andersen costing a combined $8.33m against the cap ($4.33 in real dollars).

Maybe Colorado adds a bit, but it probably wouldn't be a huge amount given the cap difference and the fact that Andersen is a pending UFA.
2.
COL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $76 643 095 $0 $5 425 000 $4 856 905 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
C
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 sept. 2020 à 19 h 39
#1
May contain nuts
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 6,612
Mentions "j'aime": 2,016
(redacted; I got my stats very wrong)
2 sept. 2020 à 19 h 39
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 671
Mentions "j'aime": 82
leafs easily say no
2 sept. 2020 à 19 h 41
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Stop this
2 sept. 2020 à 19 h 42
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Yeah Andersen’s not close to a top 10 goalie but he’s better than a decent backup c’mon now
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 19 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Yeah leafs say no, lol just made a AGM Andersen for grubauer. It's poor asset management to trade him for a middle tier goalie and nothing else. Andersen definitely brings more of a return
2 sept. 2020 à 19 h 55
#6
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Unfortunately @Richard88 this is one of your worst takes buddy.

Andersen >>> Francouz in trade value
2 sept. 2020 à 20 h 0
#7
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: MakeMarnerACentre
leafs easily say no


Quoting: coga16
Stop this


Quoting: Alfie11
Yeah Andersen’s not close to a top 10 goalie but he’s better than a decent backup c’mon now


Quoting: TheOtherAuston
Yeah leafs say no, lol just made a AGM Andersen for grubauer. It's poor asset management to trade him for a middle tier goalie and nothing else. Andersen definitely brings more of a return


Quoting: McRanteskog
Unfortunately @Richard88 this is one of your worst takes buddy.

Andersen >>> Francouz in trade value


Guys, I said pretty clearly in the trade description that Colorado should add:

"Maybe Colorado adds a bit, but it probably wouldn't be a huge amount given the cap difference and the fact that Andersen is a pending UFA."

Discussions in other trades suggest that Francouz's value is a 2nd rounder (Montreal fans today like @SevenLeg were ok with STL 2020 2nd for Francouz for example). How much more than a 2nd round pick do you think a pending UFA goalie is worth?

Again, I do think Andersen is worth more than Francouz, but not by a huge amount. Do feel free to suggest what the add should be though instead of just scoffing. This is just a friendly discussion based on a hypothetical idea after all. smile
2 sept. 2020 à 20 h 2
#8
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Richard88
Guys, I said pretty clearly in the trade description that Colorado should add:

"Maybe Colorado adds a bit, but it probably wouldn't be a huge amount given the cap difference and the fact that Andersen is a pending UFA."

Discussions in other trades suggest that Francouz's value is a 2nd rounder (Montreal fans today like @SevenLeg were ok with STL 2020 2nd for Francouz for example). How much more than a 2nd round pick do you think a pending UFA goalie is worth?

Again, I do think Andersen is worth more than Francouz, but not by a huge amount. Do feel free to suggest what the add should be though instead of just scoffing. This is just a friendly discussion based on a hypothetical idea after all. smile


COL adds Zadorov to Francouz for Andersen
2 sept. 2020 à 20 h 6
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,721
Mentions "j'aime": 5,224
This is getting pretty dragged through the mud, but I'm gonna go ahead and say that this isn't as bad as some of the comments are reflecting.

Do I think the Leafs do it? No. There's not enough value coming to the Leafs (which you did mention), imo, but mainly the issue for me is the lack of NHL track record with Francouz. I wouldn't mind the Leafs going tandem with their goaltending, but Francouz and Campbell have played a combined 106 NHL games. There is just too much potential there for the Leafs to find themselves up **** creek without a paddle.

Having said that, it sure would be nice if the Leafs could have a solid tandem for $3.675m for the next two years, and I think you recognized that and tried to make something work.
TheOtherAuston a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 20 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Quoting: Richard88
Guys, I said pretty clearly in the trade description that Colorado should add:

"Maybe Colorado adds a bit, but it probably wouldn't be a huge amount given the cap difference and the fact that Andersen is a pending UFA."

Discussions in other trades suggest that Francouz's value is a 2nd rounder (Montreal fans today like @SevenLeg were ok with STL 2020 2nd for Francouz for example). How much more than a 2nd round pick do you think a pending UFA goalie is worth?

Again, I do think Andersen is worth more than Francouz, but not by a huge amount. Do feel free to suggest what the add should be though instead of just scoffing. This is just a friendly discussion based on a hypothetical idea after all. smile


If francouz is worth a 2nd Andersen is worth a first and a pretty good prospect.
2 sept. 2020 à 20 h 18
#11
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,165
Mentions "j'aime": 20,487
Quoting: TheOtherAuston
If francouz is worth a 2nd Andersen is worth a first and a pretty good prospect.


Thing is, Francouz has been statistically better than Andersen this year and is signed to a ridiculously good contract and the latter is a pending UFA.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 20 h 18
#12
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,165
Mentions "j'aime": 20,487
Quoting: TheOtherAuston
If francouz is worth a 2nd Andersen is worth a first and a pretty good prospect.


Thing is, Francouz has been statistically better than Andersen this year and is signed to a ridiculously good contract and the latter is a pending UFA.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 20 h 22
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,015
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Quoting: SevenLeg
Thing is, Francouz has been statistically better than Andersen this year and is signed to a ridiculously good contract and the latter is a pending UFA.


He's only played 36 games it's hard to use his stats against one of the top 3 busiest goalies in the league for the past 4 years and he has 1 more year than Freddie
2 sept. 2020 à 20 h 30
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
I'm assuming you're thinking the leafs managment has not seen the series bs the stars? Where Francouz literally lost his job to Hutchinson and couldn't stop a beach ball? Lol. Francouz has negative value now btw.
2 sept. 2020 à 20 h 33
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Commonsense27
I'm assuming you're thinking the leafs managment has not seen the series bs the stars? Where Francouz literally lost his job to Hutchinson and couldn't stop a beach ball? Lol. Francouz has negative value now btw.


He hurt his hand In game 2 which is why he can’t play right now, he has battling an Injury the whole series.
Youre not a smart one
SevenLeg et Richard88 a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 21 h 3
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: coga16
He hurt his hand In game 2 which is why he can’t play right now, he has battling an Injury the whole series.
Youre not a smart one


Ah, I see. His hand was the reason he had a sub .900 save percentage and 3 + goals against. He looked brutal all 6 games. Get real bud. He has no value. At best an average backup
2 sept. 2020 à 21 h 15
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Commonsense27
Ah, I see. His hand was the reason he had a sub .900 save percentage and 3 + goals against. He looked brutal all 6 games. Get real bud. He has no value. At best an average backup


He was having issues covering the puck bc you guessed it, an injury. He only started 3 games in this series

You really are not very bright and at this point you’re just a sad pathetic troll
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 22 h 36
#18
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
This is getting pretty dragged through the mud, but I'm gonna go ahead and say that this isn't as bad as some of the comments are reflecting.

Do I think the Leafs do it? No. There's not enough value coming to the Leafs (which you did mention), imo, but mainly the issue for me is the lack of NHL track record with Francouz. I wouldn't mind the Leafs going tandem with their goaltending, but Francouz and Campbell have played a combined 106 NHL games. There is just too much potential there for the Leafs to find themselves up **** creek without a paddle.

Having said that, it sure would be nice if the Leafs could have a solid tandem for $3.675m for the next two years, and I think you recognized that and tried to make something work.


Thanks for your thoughts, appreciated.

In the trade description I mentioned this: "Leafs save $3m in this trade, and can allocated some of that to upgrade Campbell as well and run with a fairly cheap 1A/1B tandem."

As you can see my point is that the cap savings from Andersen to Francouz can be used to upgrade Campbell as well to a better goalie. For example, you could acquire Kuemper in a separate trade and go with Kuemper/Francouz which is a cheaper and better tandem than Andersen/Campbell, and also signed for a year longer.
2 sept. 2020 à 22 h 39
#19
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Commonsense27
Ah, I see. His hand was the reason he had a sub .900 save percentage and 3 + goals against. He looked brutal all 6 games. Get real bud. He has no value. At best an average backup


He had 3 bad games, that's it. In the round robin he had a 30 save shutout. Sometimes goalies have bad games, it just so happened that he had bad games while playing partially injured against a team that has been gooning it up big time in his crease with the refs swallowing their whistles.
2 sept. 2020 à 22 h 40
#20
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: McRanteskog
COL adds Zadorov to Francouz for Andersen


Zadorov was the 1st star of the night tonight against Dallas. He had his best game of the playoffs, and has actually bee one of our best and most steady Dmen in the playoffs overall. Loved his game today, and it's making me rethink whether we should move on from him.
2 sept. 2020 à 22 h 42
#21
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Richard88
Zadorov was the 1st star of the night tonight against Dallas. He had his best game of the playoffs, and has actually bee one of our best and most steady Dmen in the playoffs overall. Loved his game today, and it's making me rethink whether we should move on from him.


Timmins hits head on glass, unfit to play.
Not looking good at all
2 sept. 2020 à 23 h 6
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,721
Mentions "j'aime": 5,224
Quoting: Richard88
Thanks for your thoughts, appreciated.

In the trade description I mentioned this: "Leafs save $3m in this trade, and can allocated some of that to upgrade Campbell as well and run with a fairly cheap 1A/1B tandem."

As you can see my point is that the cap savings from Andersen to Francouz can be used to upgrade Campbell as well to a better goalie. For example, you could acquire Kuemper in a separate trade and go with Kuemper/Francouz which is a cheaper and better tandem than Andersen/Campbell, and also signed for a year longer.


That plan seems to be adding extra steps and probably spending extra assets to get to a pretty similar destination.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage