Krug is a FA no one has to trade for him

You also realize you have to give to get in a trade, which is why that LW column is way to long. Because none of the people in the trade bait column is worth a damn.

As far as Rask, if management doesn't send him out they are crazy. He tanked their chances while the team has an aging core and won't be competitive much longer.

So where do you want me to put Krug and Chara? yeah I thought so, thats the only category they fit in lol
The reason LW is so long is because the bruins are in a good position, they dont NEED to trade people like AZ or Anahiem or etc... (also EVERYONE in the Bait column is worth something expect for Moore)
Not much to talk about with Rask until he does something

Ritchie, Zboril, Moore, JFK....this is not an inspiring list.

I think Bjork and Urho are expendable assets...that could generate healthy returns.

Its not a long list correct, unlike other teams the bruins are in winning mode so they arent gonna be selling anything exciting

[zzzzzzzzz]

I think Grizz is a low key untouchable rn, at least with the left side being a wait and see what happens with Krug and Chara. I think Debrusk is on the could be moved list for the right price (obviously you know this lol). Krejci is interesting, I think there would be a market out there for him and if we decided to retain could probably get a pretty good return but I don't think Sweeney would. I would not move Kuraly, he's a gamer. Bjork im unsure of, he shows those signs of what he can be, just a matter of putting it all together for him, he's on a good contract, I don't think I moved him yet unless the deal was a definite overpayment.

Thats fair, i think the idea here was that hes a good look for Seattle so they could likely move him if Krug and Chara come back, but if not idk

Zboril is staying with Krug and Chara gone. The top 2 in the center column to me are the only ones at risk.

Chara and Krug are strange because they ARENT trade biat, but they also ARENT a gauranteed roster player