SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Roster Attempt 9

Créé par: NJ11
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 31 août 2020
Publié: 31 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
2750 000 $
23 250 000 $
1800 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 150 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Sörensen, Marcus
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
2.
CAR
  1. Labanc, Kevin
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (COL)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 273 333 $0 $490 000 $7 226 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 août 2020 à 23 h 26
#1
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Definite yes on the Kase deal from SJ's end but a definite no for me on the Labanc package for Trocheck.

I like the overall idea of pairing up Cooch with Hertl and getting another 2nd line center though.
NJ11 a aimé ceci.
31 août 2020 à 23 h 30
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,212
Mentions "j'aime": 2,956
Canes pass. Lebanc isn’t what we need while subtracting our 2C
NJ11 a aimé ceci.
31 août 2020 à 23 h 30
#3
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,684
Mentions "j'aime": 1,881
I really like this roster.
31 août 2020 à 23 h 40
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
I actually quite like this roster. If you could figure out how to get Danault from MTL instead of Trocheck, that would be even better. It's good as is, but Danault is a better player imo and costs less. One of the better Sharks A-GMs I've seen in awhile to be honest so big props.
NJ11 a aimé ceci.
31 août 2020 à 23 h 49
#5
Démarrer sujet
JonesIS(not)aStarter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: ecupirate07
Canes pass. Lebanc isn’t what we need while subtracting our 2C


I can see that but I don't think Trocheck is a good stylistic fit for Carolina. He didn't play too well in the reg season games he played and his playoffs weren't too good. I think he'd fit with San Jose a bit more in terms of the pace they play at and getting the most out of his skill set. Carolina sheds a bit of Cap, gets some picks, and gets a younger player back who they can fit in their top 9 or trade for more draft capital/goaltender. Additionally, they can attempt to have one of their young players on a cheaper deal elevate their role. Overall I feel like it's a fair deal for each team
31 août 2020 à 23 h 58
#6
Démarrer sujet
JonesIS(not)aStarter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
I actually quite like this roster. If you could figure out how to get Danault from MTL instead of Trocheck, that would be even better. It's good as is, but Danault is a better player imo and costs less. One of the better Sharks A-GMs I've seen in awhile to be honest so big props.


Thanks! I think this type of roster fits the direction they should aim for. Couture, Meier, and Hertl top line can compete with the best in the league IMO. A decent second line that can hold it's own. The bottom six full of guys that will most likely see reduced 5 on 5 ice time but more time on the PK and in Leivo's case some PP time maybe. The defense is just staggered so that Vlasic, Burns, and Karlsson don't get burned out. The Goaltending is hopefully a tandem that plays an equal split so each stays fresh and can hopefully perform at an above-average level. With all that said this team needs Karlsson to perform at an elite level and the goaltending to improve if they want any thoughts of making the playoff let alone a deep run.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2020 à 0 h 2
#7
CanesPens Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Not too high on that Canes deal.
NJ11 a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2020 à 0 h 17
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
Quoting: NJ11
Thanks! I think this type of roster fits the direction they should aim for. Couture, Meier, and Hertl top line can compete with the best in the league IMO. A decent second line that can hold it's own. The bottom six full of guys that will most likely see reduced 5 on 5 ice time but more time on the PK and in Leivo's case some PP time maybe. The defense is just staggered so that Vlasic, Burns, and Karlsson don't get burned out. The Goaltending is hopefully a tandem that plays an equal split so each stays fresh and can hopefully perform at an above-average level. With all that said this team needs Karlsson to perform at an elite level and the goaltending to improve if they want any thoughts of making the playoff let alone a deep run.


This is pretty much the perfect answer haha. I like the idea of moving Couture to Hertl's wing or vice versa as well. They can both play wing and I think consolidating our offensive fire one line wile bolstering our center depth is a good idea. The 2nd line is very solid, and the defense is (in my opinion) pretty much exactly what it needs to be pairing-wise. We definitely need a goalie who can at least split starts so I like Talbot as an option in that respect if he signs for that price. The 3rd line is good too if Leonard has a good training camp and if Leivo can stay healthy. I just wonder how much Eakin actually signs for. Cause he had a pretty bad year, but I think he knows that he probably deserves more than $1.5 million. I almost wonder if Jumbo at 3C for 500k less would be a better deal. I dunno. Just kind of thinking out loud. But anyway yeah let's hope Doug can pull something like this off.
NJ11 a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2020 à 10 h 43
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Bruins might accept, they probably need to have another deal lined up for a top 6 RW first, but then they would do this
NJ11 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage