SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Burns half retained to TOR for Johnsson and a 1st and Haula Braun Fast to SJ

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 30 août 2020
Publié: 30 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
1750 000 $
2925 000 $
23 250 000 $
23 250 000 $
21 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
2.
SJS
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
TOR
  1. Burns, Brent (4 000 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de BOS
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $76 906 666 $0 $297 500 $4 593 334 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
 
 
 
 

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 août 2020 à 23 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
We have enough forwards disguised as defenceman, can't see them going after an aging Brent Burns
30 août 2020 à 23 h 58
#2
tomato
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 305
Stop trying to make Burns to the leafs happen. It's not happening under any circumstance.
chungus a aimé ceci.
30 août 2020 à 23 h 59
#3
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
We have enough forwards disguised as defenceman, can't see them going after an aging Brent Burns


I can see the argument for not wanting offensive forwards but the 'aging' Brent Burns is a nonissue to anyone who knows anything about freakish athletic beast of a person that is Brent Burns. I guarantee he'll be better than ever after this long layoff for the next few seasons. We just need depth at other positions but this deal is a win-win for both teams.
Vizix et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
31 août 2020 à 0 h 3
#4
tomato
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 305
Quoting: CheechYou
I can see the argument for not wanting offensive forwards but the 'aging' Brent Burns is a nonissue to anyone who knows anything about freakish athletic beast of a person that is Brent Burns. I guarantee he'll be better than ever after this long layoff for the next few seasons. We just need depth at other positions but this deal is a win-win for both teams.


Half of your posts have to do with getting rid of burns and most of them have you retaining a significant chunk of salary. If hes such a freak just keep him. Not even you believe hell be worth the rest of his contract.
chungus a aimé ceci.
31 août 2020 à 0 h 7
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: CheechYou
I can see the argument for not wanting offensive forwards but the 'aging' Brent Burns is a nonissue to anyone who knows anything about freakish athletic beast of a person that is Brent Burns. I guarantee he'll be better than ever after this long layoff for the next few seasons. We just need depth at other positions but this deal is a win-win for both teams.


Realistically we could draft a Dman at 15OA and develop him, groom him on the Marlies, and slot him into the Top 4 while a 39 year old brent burns is still making $8M AAV. Please, we don't want him, esp not for that pick lmao. I hope for your sake he continues to produce and San Jose finds success
tomato43 et EddieBower a aimé ceci.
31 août 2020 à 0 h 9
#6
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Modifié 31 août 2020 à 0 h 40
Quoting: tomato43
Stop trying to make Burns to the leafs happen. It's not happening under any circumstance.

Half of your posts have to do with getting rid of burns and most of them have you retaining a significant chunk of salary. If hes such a freak just keep him. Not even you believe hell be worth the rest of his contract.


Dude. I'm not even talking to you. If you hate this idea so much, please, don't hesitate to ignore it...

SJ is a team that, unlike TOR, isn't particularly cap-crunched and can retain on a salary like Burns. Burns is superfluous with the Sharks having EK65 on the right side and at that contract. If they didn't have EK65, trading Burns would not be in the best short-term interest of the Sharks, barring an overpay.
31 août 2020 à 0 h 12
#7
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
Realistically we could draft a Dman at 15OA and develop him, groom him on the Marlies, and slot him into the Top 4 while a 39 year old brent burns is still making $8M AAV. Please, we don't want him, esp not for that pick lmao. I hope for your sake he continues to produce and San Jose finds success


Please do the courtesy of actually taking a look at my proposed roster before critiquing it. He won't be $8mil at 39yrs old -- he'll be making 4mil in this instance.

And thanks. I'm hoping both SJ and TOR find success too.
31 août 2020 à 0 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: CheechYou
Please do the courtesy of actually taking a look at my proposed roster before critiquing it. He won't be $8mil at 39yrs old -- he'll be making 4mil in this instance


In my drafting scenario, he was never traded and thus was still making the full $8M on san jose.
tomato43 a aimé ceci.
31 août 2020 à 0 h 22
#9
tomato
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 305
I wouldn't take on burns contact at 50% retained if all we gave up was a 7th and it came with Tampas 1st this year. thats how bad the last half of the rest of his deal is going to be.
31 août 2020 à 0 h 25
#10
Démarrer sujet
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: tomato43
I wouldn't take on burns contact at 50% retained if all we gave up was a 7th and it came with Tampas 1st this year. thats how bad the last half of the rest of his deal is going to be.


Why are you still here?
Vizix et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
31 août 2020 à 8 h 9
#11
tomato
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 305
Quoting: CheechYou
Why are you still here?


Someone has to comment on all your attempts to ditch Burns.
chungus a aimé ceci.
31 août 2020 à 10 h 17
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: CheechYou
[...]the 'aging' Brent Burns is a nonissue to anyone who knows anything about freakish athletic beast of a person that is Brent Burns. I guarantee he'll be better than ever after this long layoff for the next few seasons.


Quoting: tomato43
Someone has to comment on all your attempts to ditch Burns.


I wonder if he's secretly the real Brent Burns trying to speak a trade into existence where he gets to go to a cup contender
tomato43 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage