SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retool H BYFIELD HELLO

Créé par: Tkachinla
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 28 août 2020
Publié: 28 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
2825 000 $
1725 000 $
1725 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
2800 000 $
1725 000 $
1725 000 $
1725 000 $
1725 000 $
33 500 000 $
1775 000 $
32 750 000 $
22 250 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Byfield, Quinton
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
2.
CGY
  1. Quick, Jonathan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
#2
LAK
  1. Pelletier, Jakob
  2. Phillips, Matthew
  3. Rittich, David
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
#7
#19
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $71 176 666 $0 $457 500 $10 323 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Byfield, Quinton
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 août 2020 à 16 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
Swap out Kylington for Pelletier and I could see the Kings going for something like this.

However, Quick isn't a cap dump, and you're not dong the Kings any favors by taking his contract. They're happy with their current tandem and aren't looking to move him.
28 août 2020 à 16 h 42
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 364
Mentions "j'aime": 163
JG is not worth the 7OA to NJ.
JRoss a aimé ceci.
28 août 2020 à 16 h 44
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Swap out Kylington for Pelletier and I could see the Kings going for something like this.

However, Quick isn't a cap dump, and you're not dong the Kings any favors by taking his contract. They're happy with their current tandem and aren't looking to move him.


I'd put Pelletier in the deal in place of Kylington.

+ The other part of the Quick for Rittich swap (apart from a nice cap savings to LA) is that Rittich is 28 years old and Quick will turn 35 years old in January 2021...so I think LA would do a 1-for-1 swap of those two players all day. TL;DR: The Rittich for Quick piece of the trade is net positive value to LA.
28 août 2020 à 16 h 44
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: DevilsFanInTX
JG is not worth the 7OA to NJ.


He is if he extends with NJ, and there's a very, very high probability that he would do exactly that.
28 août 2020 à 16 h 47
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Swap out Kylington for Pelletier and I could see the Kings going for something like this.

However, Quick isn't a cap dump, and you're not dong the Kings any favors by taking his contract. They're happy with their current tandem and aren't looking to move him.


*Updated it with Pelletier included instead of Kylington.

Gaudreau + Rittich + Pelletier + Phillips + 2020 CGY 1st (#19)

for

Quick + 2020 LA 1st (#2: Byfield)
28 août 2020 à 16 h 50
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 494
Mentions "j'aime": 131
Quoting: Tkachinla
He is if he extends with NJ, and there's a very, very high probability that he would do exactly that.

They don’t need him next year or probably even the year after. Sign up for free when he is a free agent
DevilsFanInTX et SPdevotee a aimé ceci.
28 août 2020 à 17 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
Quoting: Tkachinla
*Updated it with Pelletier included instead of Kylington.

Gaudreau + Rittich + Pelletier + Phillips + 2020 CGY 1st (#19)

for

Quick + 2020 LA 1st (#2: Byfield)


I think the Kings would consider this trade. I don't think you mean to include Gaudreau in the trade to LA though since you have him going to NJ above.
28 août 2020 à 17 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
Quoting: Tkachinla
I'd put Pelletier in the deal in place of Kylington.

+ The other part of the Quick for Rittich swap (apart from a nice cap savings to LA) is that Rittich is 28 years old and Quick will turn 35 years old in January 2021...so I think LA would do a 1-for-1 swap of those two players all day. TL;DR: The Rittich for Quick piece of the trade is net positive value to LA.


The Kings don't think so. You have to remember what Quick is worth to the franchise. He's the best goaltender in franchise history and a leader on this team. They already have their goaltender of the future in Petersen, and have a strong stable of younger guys in the pipeline (Ingham, Parik, Hrenak) ready to back up Petersen when Quick's contract ends. You can't overlook the value coming back to LA in the trade you proposed, so I think the Kings would trade him in that case, but I don't think they'd do a 1-for-1 swap of Quick for Rittich.
28 août 2020 à 17 h 33
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,601
Mentions "j'aime": 18,155
That is a whole lot to give for one 17-year old. Sheesh.
Tkachinla a aimé ceci.
28 août 2020 à 18 h 57
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,602
Mentions "j'aime": 1,592
I would rather have valimaki instead of Pelletier. Kings need that more than another center/forward

Edit: thought he was right D 🙄. I think I’d still want him though
29 août 2020 à 13 h 9
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: tkecanuck341
I think the Kings would consider this trade. I don't think you mean to include Gaudreau in the trade to LA though since you have him going to NJ above.


Correct. Just added Gaudreau to show the value from the Flames side. That's the cost of the deal for CGY.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage